• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全腹腔镜子宫切除术客观评估工具的开发:专家德尔菲法及虚拟现实模拟器评估

Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator.

作者信息

Knight Sophie, Aggarwal Rajesh, Agostini Aubert, Loundou Anderson, Berdah Stéphane, Crochet Patrice

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, La Conception Hospital, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, France.

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190580. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190580
PMID:29293635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5749811/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) requires an advanced level of operative skills and training. The aim of this study was to develop an objective scale specific for the assessment of technical skills for LH (H-OSATS) and to demonstrate feasibility of use and validity in a virtual reality setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The scale was developed using a hierarchical task analysis and a panel of international experts. A Delphi method obtained consensus among experts on relevant steps that should be included into the H-OSATS scale for assessment of operative performances. Feasibility of use and validity of the scale were evaluated by reviewing video recordings of LH performed on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Three groups of operators of different levels of experience were assessed in a Marseille teaching hospital (10 novices, 8 intermediates and 8 experienced surgeons). Correlations with scores obtained using a recognised generic global rating tool (OSATS) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 76 discrete steps were identified by the hierarchical task analysis. 14 experts completed the two rounds of the Delphi questionnaire. 64 steps reached consensus and were integrated in the scale. During the validation process, median time to rate each video recording was 25 minutes. There was a significant difference between the novice, intermediate and experienced group for total H-OSATS scores (133, 155.9 and 178.25 respectively; p = 0.002). H-OSATS scale demonstrated high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.930; p<0.001) and test retest reliability (ICC = 0.877; p<0.001). High correlations were found between total H-OSATS scores and OSATS scores (rho = 0.928; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The H-OSATS scale displayed evidence of validity for assessment of technical performances for LH performed on a virtual reality simulator. The implementation of this scale is expected to facilitate deliberate practice. Next steps should focus on evaluating the validity of the scale in the operating room.

摘要

引言

全腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)需要高水平的手术技能和培训。本研究的目的是开发一种专门用于评估LH技术技能的客观量表(H-OSATS),并证明其在虚拟现实环境中的使用可行性和有效性。

材料与方法

该量表采用层次任务分析法和国际专家小组开发。通过德尔菲法,专家们就应纳入H-OSATS量表以评估手术操作表现的相关步骤达成了共识。通过回顾在虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器上进行的LH视频记录,评估该量表的使用可行性和有效性。在马赛一家教学医院对三组不同经验水平的操作人员进行了评估(10名新手、8名中级人员和8名经验丰富的外科医生)。计算了与使用公认的通用整体评分工具(OSATS)获得的分数之间的相关性。

结果

层次任务分析共确定了76个离散步骤。14名专家完成了两轮德尔菲问卷。64个步骤达成共识并纳入量表。在验证过程中,对每个视频记录评分的中位时间为25分钟。新手组、中级组和经验丰富组的H-OSATS总分存在显著差异(分别为133分、155.9分和178.25分;p = 0.002)。H-OSATS量表显示出较高的评分者间信度(组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.930;p<0.001)和重测信度(ICC = 0.877;p<0.001)。H-OSATS总分与OSATS分数之间存在高度相关性(rho = 0.928;p<0.001)。

结论

H-OSATS量表显示出在虚拟现实模拟器上对LH技术操作进行评估的有效性证据。该量表的实施有望促进刻意练习。下一步应侧重于评估该量表在手术室中的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a394/5749811/259d5b66a8f6/pone.0190580.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a394/5749811/259d5b66a8f6/pone.0190580.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a394/5749811/259d5b66a8f6/pone.0190580.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator.全腹腔镜子宫切除术客观评估工具的开发:专家德尔菲法及虚拟现实模拟器评估
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190580. eCollection 2018.
2
Development, feasibility, validity, and reliability of a scale for objective assessment of operative performance in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.腹腔镜胃旁路手术操作绩效客观评估量表的制定、可行性、有效性和可靠性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):955-965.e8; quiz 1029-31, 1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hysterectomy on a virtual reality simulator.基于虚拟现实模拟器的腹腔镜子宫切除术循证培训计划的制定
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2474-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5249-3. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
4
Performance Assessment for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the Operating Room: Validity Evidence of a Procedure-specific Rating Scale.手术室全腹腔镜子宫切除术的绩效评估:一种特定手术评分量表的效度证据。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Oct;28(10):1743-1750.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Video-based self-assessment enhances laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator: a randomized controlled trial.基于视频的自我评估可提高虚拟现实模拟器上的腹腔镜技能:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6679-6686. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08170-7. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Simulator training and residents' first laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.模拟器训练与住院医师的首次腹腔镜子宫切除术:一项随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4874-4882. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07270-3. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Development and validity evidence of an objective structured assessment of technical skills score for minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses: the A-OSATS score.微创线性吻合、手工缝合肠吻合术的客观结构化技能评估评分的制定与有效性证据:A-OSATS 评分。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4529-4541. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08806-2. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
8
Objective assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Development and validation of a feasible rating scale for formative and summative feedback.腹腔镜全子宫切除术的客观评估:形成性和总结性反馈的可行评分量表的制定和验证。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
The Generic Error Rating Tool: A Novel Approach to Assessment of Performance and Surgical Education in Gynecologic Laparoscopy.通用错误评分工具:一种评估妇科腹腔镜手术操作表现及外科教育的新方法。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.029. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
A Reliable and Valid Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill for the Application of a Pavlik Harness Based on International Expert Consensus.基于国际专家共识的帕夫利克吊带应用技术技能的可靠且有效的客观结构化评估
J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Oct-Nov;36(7):768-72. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000557.

引用本文的文献

1
ESGE/ESGO/SERGS consensus statement on surgical steps in minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: transperitoneal and extraperitioneal approach for paraaortic lymphadenectomy.ESGE/ESGO/SERGS 关于妇科肿瘤学微创外科手术步骤的共识声明:腹盆腔和腹膜外途径用于腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Nov 4;34(11):1673-1676. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005796.
2
Outcomes of home design to support healthy cognitive ageing: modified e-Delphi exercise with older people and housing-related professionals.支持健康认知老化的居家设计成果:老年人和住房相关专业人员参与的改良版电子德尔菲研究
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05085-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS).机器人辅助子宫切除术的手术能力:机器人子宫切除术评估评分(RHAS)的开发与验证
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
2
Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hysterectomy on a virtual reality simulator.基于虚拟现实模拟器的腹腔镜子宫切除术循证培训计划的制定
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2474-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5249-3. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions.
Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review.
腹腔镜或机器人辅助妇科手术中的客观评估工具:系统评价。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1480-1497. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14840. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
4
Indigenizing and co-producing the ACGME anesthesiology milestone in Taiwan: a Delphi study and subgroup analysis.台湾地区麻醉学教育认证委员会(ACGME)里程碑的本土化与共同制定:德尔菲研究与亚组分析
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05081-2.
5
Development of a procedure-specific tool for skill assessment in left- and right-sided laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision.开发一种特定于程序的工具,用于评估左、右侧腹腔镜完全结肠系膜切除术的技能。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan;25(1):31-43. doi: 10.1111/codi.16317. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
6
The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.改善培训与教育的妇科腹腔镜手术护理标准的未来。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082192.
7
Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy-A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11-year period.子宫切除术期间的输尿管损伤-挪威一项回顾性研究,涉及 11 年间的发病情况和赔偿索赔。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14293. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
8
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review.妇科手术中技术技能测量工具:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w.
9
Pituitary society expert Delphi consensus: operative workflow in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection.垂体学会专家德尔菲共识:经鼻蝶窦垂体腺瘤切除术的手术流程。
Pituitary. 2021 Dec;24(6):839-853. doi: 10.1007/s11102-021-01162-3. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
Mapping the robotic hysterectomy learning curve and re-establishing surgical training metrics.绘制机器人子宫切除术学习曲线并重新建立手术培训指标。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;32(4):e58. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e58. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
全腹腔镜子宫切除术:良性疾病的手术学习曲线分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
4
Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?全州市妇科肿瘤患者子宫切除术的途径与手术结果:阴道子宫切除术有作用吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):348.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 12;387(10023):1094-1108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
6
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
7
An update on inpatient hysterectomy routes in the United States.美国住院子宫切除术途径的最新情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):742-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
Assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Delphi consensus survey among international experts.全腹腔镜子宫切除术评估工具:一项国际专家德尔菲共识调查
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Nov;36(11):1014-1023. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30416-3.
9
Design and validation of a novel assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing of the vaginal cuff during hysterectomy.子宫切除术中阴道残端腹腔镜缝合新型评估工具的设计与验证
J Surg Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;72(2):212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
10
Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes.住院医师参与腹腔镜子宫切除术:培训医师参与对手术时间和手术结果的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):484.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 17.