• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recurrent events analysis for examination of hospitalizations in heart failure: insights from the Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment (EFFECT) trial.心力衰竭住院的再发事件分析:来自强化有效心脏治疗反馈(EFFECT)试验的见解。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx015.
2
Prognostic value of psychosocial factors for first and recurrent hospitalizations and mortality in heart failure patients: insights from the OPERA-HF study.心理社会因素对心力衰竭患者首次和再次住院及死亡的预后价值:来自 OPERA-HF 研究的见解。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):689-696. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1112. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
3
The Hospitalization Burden and Post-Hospitalization Mortality Risk in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From the I-PRESERVE Trial (Irbesartan in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction).射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的住院负担和住院后死亡率风险:I-PRESERVE 试验(伊贝沙坦治疗心力衰竭和保留射血分数)的结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Jun;3(6):429-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.12.017. Epub 2015 May 14.
4
Employment status at time of first hospitalization for heart failure is associated with a higher risk of death and rehospitalization for heart failure.首次因心力衰竭住院时的就业状况与心力衰竭死亡和再住院的风险增加相关。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;20(2):240-247. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1046. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide-Guided Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure Reduces Repeated Hospitalizations-Results From TIME-CHF.N 端脑利钠肽前体指导的慢性心力衰竭治疗可降低再住院率——TIME-CHF 研究结果。
J Card Fail. 2017 May;23(5):382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Usefulness of administrative databases in identifying the predictive factors of repeated hospitalizations for heart failure.利用行政数据库识别心力衰竭患者再次住院的预测因素的作用。
Epidemiol Prev. 2021 Jan-Apr;45(1-2):54-61. doi: 10.19191/EP21.1-2.P054.039.
7
The impact of prior heart failure hospitalizations on long-term mortality differs by baseline risk of death.既往心力衰竭住院对长期死亡率的影响因基线死亡风险而异。
Am J Med. 2012 Feb;125(2):209.e9-209.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.014.
8
Changes in mid-life fitness predicts heart failure risk at a later age independent of interval development of cardiac and noncardiac risk factors: the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study.中年时期体能的变化可独立于心脏和非心脏危险因素的间隔发展来预测晚年发生心力衰竭的风险:库珀中心纵向研究。
Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):290-297.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
Prevalence and prognostic importance of precipitating factors leading to heart failure hospitalization: recurrent hospitalizations and mortality.导致心力衰竭住院的诱发因素的流行率和预后重要性:再住院和死亡率。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;20(2):295-303. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.901. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Repeat Hospitalizations Predict Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure.再入院可预测心力衰竭患者的死亡率。
Mil Med. 2017 Sep;182(9):e1932-e1937. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-17-00017.

引用本文的文献

1
A new method for dealing with collider bias in the PWP model for recurrent events in randomized controlled trials.一种在随机对照试验中处理复发事件的PWP模型中碰撞器偏差的新方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 26;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02596-0.
2
Arrhythmias in Patients With Heart Failure Prescribed Dofetilide or Sotalol.接受多非利特或索他洛尔治疗的心力衰竭患者的心律失常
JACC Adv. 2024 Nov 7;3(11):101354. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101354. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Comparison of statistical models for estimating intervention effects based on time-to-recurrent-event in stepped wedge cluster randomized trial using open cohort design.基于开放式队列设计的阶梯型楔形群随机试验中,估计再发事件时间的干预效果的统计模型比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01552-6.
4
Financial Incentives for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Ontario, Canada: A Cost-Utility Analysis.加拿大安大略省经导管主动脉瓣植入术的经济激励措施:成本-效用分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 19;11(8):e025085. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025085. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Left-censored recurrent event analysis in epidemiological studies: a proposal for when the number of previous episodes is unknown.左删失复发事件分析在流行病学研究中的应用:一种在先前发作次数未知时的建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 16;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01503-1.
6
The impact of a community-based heart failure multidisciplinary team clinic on healthcare utilization and costs.社区心力衰竭多学科团队诊所对医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):676-684. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13689. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
7
Sleep apnea and recurrent heart failure hospitalizations after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后睡眠呼吸暂停和心力衰竭再住院。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Dec 1;17(12):2399-2407. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9442.
8
The Role of Ambulatory Heart Failure Clinics to Avoid Heart Failure Admissions.门诊心力衰竭诊所对避免心力衰竭住院的作用。
CJC Open. 2019 Dec 6;2(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.11.007. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
Analysis Of Re-Hospitalizations For Patients With Heart Failure Caused By Coronary Heart Disease: Data Of First Event And Recurrent Event.冠心病所致心力衰竭患者再住院情况分析:首次事件与复发事件数据
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Nov 14;15:1333-1341. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S218694. eCollection 2019.
10
Serum ST2 and hospitalization rates in Caucasian and African American outpatients with heart failure.心力衰竭的白种人和非裔美国门诊患者的血清 ST2 和住院率。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;304:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.存在竞争风险时生存数据的分析导论
Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):601-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719.
2
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Hospitalization for Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Events, and Death: Outcomes at 4 Years From the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry.糖尿病对心力衰竭、心血管事件和死亡住院的影响:来自持续健康降低动脉粥样硬化血栓形成(REACH)登记研究的 4 年结果。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 8;132(10):923-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014796. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
3
The Affordable Care Act at 5 Years.《平价医疗法案》实施五周年
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2451-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1503614. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
Modelling recurrent events: a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology.复发性事件建模:流行病学分析教程
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;44(1):324-33. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu222. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
5
Heart failure re-admission: measuring the ever shortening gap between repeat heart failure hospitalizations.心力衰竭再入院:测量反复心力衰竭住院之间不断缩短的间隔时间。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e106494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106494. eCollection 2014.
6
Paradigm shifts in heart-failure therapy--a timeline.心力衰竭治疗的范式转变——时间线
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):989-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1410241. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
7
Modelling recurrent events: comparison of statistical models with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals on recurrent malaria episodes data.复发性事件建模:基于复发性疟疾发作数据对具有连续和不连续风险区间的统计模型进行比较。
Malar J. 2014 Jul 29;13:293. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-293.
8
A path forward on Medicare readmissions.医疗保险再入院问题的解决之道。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1175-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1300122. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Outcomes and care of patients with acute heart failure syndromes and cardiac troponin elevation.急性心力衰竭综合征和心肌肌钙蛋白升高患者的结局和护理。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Mar;6(2):193-202. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000075. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
10
Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms: analysis of repeat hospitalizations.依普利酮治疗收缩性心力衰竭伴轻度症状患者:再住院分析。
Circulation. 2012 Nov 6;126(19):2317-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.110536. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

心力衰竭住院的再发事件分析:来自强化有效心脏治疗反馈(EFFECT)试验的见解。

Recurrent events analysis for examination of hospitalizations in heart failure: insights from the Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment (EFFECT) trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada.

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave G1 06,Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx015.

DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx015
PMID:29293979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5805119/
Abstract

AIMS

Hospitalizations often occur multiple times during the disease course of a heart failure (HF) patient. However, repeated hospitalizations have not been explored in a fulsome way in this setting. We investigated the association between patient factors and the risk of hospitalization among patients with HF using an extension of the Cox model for the analysis of recurrent events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined hospitalizations and predictors of readmission among newly discharged patients with HF in the Enhanced Feedback For Effective Cardiac Treatment phase 1 (April 1999-March 2001) study with the Prentice-Williams-Peterson model with total time. Of 8948 individuals discharged alive from hospital, 7562 (84.5%) were hospitalized at least once during 15-year follow-up. More than 31 000 hospitalizations were observed. There was a progressive shortening of the interval length between hospitalization episodes. An increasing number of comorbidities (average 2.3 per patient) was associated to an increasing hazard of being readmitted to hospital. Most patient factors associated with the risk of hospitalization have been previously described in the literature. However, the estimates were smaller in comparison to a traditional analysis based on the Cox model.

CONCLUSION

The importance of patient factors for the risk of being admitted to hospital was variable over the course of the disease. Conditions such as diabetes and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease had a sustained association with the rate of hospitalization across all episodes examined. The analysis of recurrent events can explore the longitudinal aspect of HF and the critical issue of hospitalizations in this population.

摘要

目的

心力衰竭(HF)患者在疾病过程中经常多次住院。然而,在这种情况下,尚未全面探讨反复住院的情况。我们使用 Cox 模型的扩展来分析复发性事件,研究了患者因素与 HF 患者住院风险之间的关系。

方法和结果

我们在增强反馈有效心脏治疗阶段 1(1999 年 4 月至 2001 年 3 月)研究中,使用 Prentice-Williams-Peterson 模型(总时间)检查了新出院的 HF 患者的住院情况和再入院预测因素。在 15 年的随访中,从医院出院的 8948 人中,有 7562 人(84.5%)至少住院一次。观察到超过 31000 次住院。住院间隔逐渐缩短。合并症的数量增加(平均每位患者 2.3 种)与再次住院的风险增加相关。与住院风险相关的大多数患者因素以前在文献中已有描述。然而,与基于 Cox 模型的传统分析相比,这些估计值较小。

结论

在疾病过程中,患者因素对住院风险的重要性是可变的。在所有检查的发作中,糖尿病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病等疾病与住院率之间存在持续的关联。复发性事件的分析可以探索 HF 的纵向方面和该人群中住院的关键问题。