• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双重劣势:台湾的收入不平等、空间极化和死亡率。

Double disadvantage: income inequality, spatial polarization and mortality rates in Taiwan.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):e228-e234. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx179.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdx179
PMID:29294015
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that social and economic spatial polarization is associated with various health outcomes. However, few studies have examined the joint effect of income inequality and spatial polarization on health.

METHODS

Data on mortality in 2008-12 were from the Ministry of Health and Welfare. We constructed economic spatial polarization using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) by tax data from the Ministry of Finance. The Gini coefficient was from the Family Income and Expenditure Survey. Using multilevel datasets of 352 townships nested within 20 cities in Taiwan, we examined the association between township-level ICE and mortality, and further examined whether city-level income inequality moderate this association.

RESULTS

In 2008-12, the average age-standardized mortality in Taiwan was 470.5 per 100 000 populations. As compared to the highest income-based ICE quintile, the lowest ICE quintile was associated with an excess 171.7 deaths per 100 000 people (95% CI = 116.1, 227.3) after controlling for income inequality and population size. One unit rise in the Gini coefficient further increased 29.9 deaths (95% CI = 12.4, 47.5) for the lowest ICE quintile, as compared to the highest.

CONCLUSION

The joint effect of income inequality and small-scale economic polarization may shed light on how inequalities increase mortality.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,社会和经济空间极化与各种健康结果有关。然而,很少有研究调查收入不平等和空间极化对健康的联合影响。

方法

2008-12 年的死亡率数据来自卫生部。我们利用财政部税收数据构建经济空间极化的极值集中指数(ICE)。基尼系数来自家庭收入和支出调查。利用台湾 20 个城市中嵌套的 352 个乡镇的多层次数据集,我们检验了乡镇级 ICE 与死亡率之间的关联,并进一步检验了城市级收入不平等是否调节了这种关联。

结果

在 2008-12 年,台湾的平均年龄标准化死亡率为每 10 万人 470.5 人。与收入最高的 ICE 五分位数相比,收入最低的 ICE 五分位数与每 10 万人中多余的 171.7 例死亡有关(95%CI=116.1,227.3),在控制了收入不平等和人口规模后。与收入最高的 ICE 五分位数相比,基尼系数每增加一个单位,收入最低的 ICE 五分位数的死亡人数将进一步增加 29.9 人(95%CI=12.4,47.5)。

结论

收入不平等和小规模经济极化的联合效应可能揭示了不平等如何增加死亡率。

相似文献

1
Double disadvantage: income inequality, spatial polarization and mortality rates in Taiwan.双重劣势:台湾的收入不平等、空间极化和死亡率。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):e228-e234. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx179.
2
Spatial social polarization and birth outcomes: preterm birth and infant mortality - New York City, 2010-14.空间社会极化与出生结局:早产和婴儿死亡率——纽约市,2010 - 2014年
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb;46(1):157-166. doi: 10.1177/1403494817701566. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Spatial patterning, correlates, and inequality in suicide across 432 neighborhoods in Taipei City, Taiwan.台湾台北市 432 个邻里自杀的空间模式、相关性及其不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:20-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
The politics of preventable deaths: local spending, income inequality, and premature mortality in US cities.可预防死亡的政治学:美国城市的地方支出、收入不平等与过早死亡率
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Mar;58(3):175-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.008672.
5
Income inequality among American states and the incidence of major depression.美国各州的收入不平等与重度抑郁症的发病率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Feb;68(2):110-5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203093. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Inequality, residential segregation by income, and mortality in US cities.美国城市中的不平等、按收入划分的居住隔离与死亡率
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Mar;56(3):183-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.3.183.
7
Poverty and inequality - but of what - as social determinants of health in Africa?贫困与不平等——但具体是何种贫困与不平等——作为非洲健康的社会决定因素?
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Dec;15(4):1330-8. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i4.36.
8
For whom is income inequality most harmful? A multi-level analysis of income inequality and mortality in Norway.收入不平等对谁危害最大?挪威收入不平等与死亡率的多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Nov;63(10):2562-74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
9
A Swiss paradox? Higher income inequality of municipalities is associated with lower mortality in Switzerland.瑞士悖论?瑞士各地方政府收入不平等程度越高,死亡率越低。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;30(8):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-9987-7. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Income inequality and health in Ontario: a multilevel analysis.安大略省的收入不平等与健康:一项多层次分析。
Can J Public Health. 2005 May-Jun;96(3):206-11. doi: 10.1007/BF03403692.

引用本文的文献

1
Current approaches to measuring local racial and ethnic residential segregation in population health studies.人口健康研究中测量当地种族和族裔居住隔离的当前方法。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2024 Mar;11(1):32-43. doi: 10.1007/s40471-023-00335-x. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
2
Relative socio-economic position and meaning and purpose in life in adolescents: An intangible cost of social inequalities.青少年的相对社会经济地位以及生活的意义和目的:社会不平等的一种无形代价。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 12;30:101776. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101776. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Income rank and life satisfaction: Examining the relationship with wealth inequality among middle-aged and older indian adults.
收入排名与生活满意度:探究印度中老年成年人财富不平等之间的关系。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Dec 18;29:101740. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101740. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Associations of objective and subjective relative deprivation with health, happiness, and life satisfaction.客观和主观相对剥夺与健康、幸福及生活满意度的关联。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Nov 9;28:101727. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101727. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the income inequality research in health field: A bibliometric analysis.对健康领域收入不平等研究的全面计量学和内容分析:文献计量分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;10:901112. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.901112. eCollection 2022.