Hertzum Morten
Royal School of Library and Information Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1033-1037.
During the daily treatment of patients large quantities of data are recorded in electronic health records (EHRs). Compared to data in paper records, these EHR data are easily available for reuse in research and quality improvement. However, the opportunities for reuse depend on the quality of the data. In this study we analyze the completeness with which main treatment activities are recorded on emergency department (ED) whiteboards and whether completeness varies with the severity of the patients' condition. Data from 381,231 ED visits show that after the whiteboard had been in successful use for several years the clinicians recorded four of the five main treatment activities with a completeness of less than 50%. Completeness tended to increase with three indicators of the severity of the patient's condition: triage level, length of stay, and patient age. We conclude that the low completeness of the activity data probably prevents most types of reuse.
在日常治疗患者的过程中,大量数据被记录在电子健康记录(EHR)中。与纸质记录中的数据相比,这些EHR数据便于在研究和质量改进中重复使用。然而,重复使用的机会取决于数据的质量。在本研究中,我们分析了急诊室(ED)白板上记录主要治疗活动的完整性,以及完整性是否随患者病情严重程度而变化。来自381,231次急诊就诊的数据显示,在白板成功使用数年之后,临床医生记录的五项主要治疗活动中有四项的完整性低于50%。完整性往往随着患者病情严重程度的三个指标而增加:分诊级别、住院时间和患者年龄。我们得出结论,活动数据的低完整性可能会阻碍大多数类型的重复使用。