• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家三级医院急诊科开发基于快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）的脓毒症临床决策支持系统

Development of a Quick SOFA-Based Sepsis Clinical Decision Support System in a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department.

作者信息

Kim Youn-Jung, Lee Jae-Ho, Lee Sang-Wook, Jung Ming-Young, Kim Won Young

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Medical Information Office, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1367.

PMID:29295446
Abstract

New definition of sepsis introduced quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score. A qSOFA-based sepsis decision support system was designed and developed in an emergency departement. The system has functions of autmatically retrieving qSOFA score, 3 and 6 hours of sepsis and septic shock treatment bundle, semi-automatic calculation of SOFA score, etc. Early usage and user requests are needed to find aspects of improvement.

摘要

脓毒症的新定义引入了快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）评分。在急诊科设计并开发了基于qSOFA的脓毒症决策支持系统。该系统具有自动获取qSOFA评分、脓毒症及脓毒性休克治疗集束方案3小时和6小时内容、半自动计算SOFA评分等功能。需要早期使用情况和用户需求来发现改进方面。

相似文献

1
Development of a Quick SOFA-Based Sepsis Clinical Decision Support System in a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department.在一家三级医院急诊科开发基于快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）的脓毒症临床决策支持系统
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1367.
2
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
3
Comparison of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Dysfunction score and severity levels assigned with the Andorran Triage Model in an urban tertiary care hospital emergency department.比较快速脓毒症相关器官功能障碍评分和安道尔分诊模型在城市三级护理医院急诊科中分配的严重程度级别。
Emergencias. 2018;30(6):400-404.
4
qSOFA Has Poor Sensitivity for Prehospital Identification of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.qSOFA对院前严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的识别敏感性较差。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):489-497. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1274348. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
6
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
7
New Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions: Clinical Implications and Controversies.新的脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义：临床意义与争议
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Sep;31(3):397-413. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
[Assessment of the severity scores in patients included in a sepsis code in an Emergency Departament].[急诊科脓毒症代码纳入患者的严重程度评分评估]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018 Aug;31(4):316-322. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Low Accuracy of Positive qSOFA Criteria for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients During the Early Period After Emergency Department Presentation.急诊就诊后早期危重症脓毒症患者 qSOFA 标准阳性预测 28 天死亡率的准确性较低。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):1-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 29.