• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子诊断检测与匹配药物疗法在转移性癌症治疗中的真实世界应用。

Real-world utilization of molecular diagnostic testing and matched drug therapies in the treatment of metastatic cancers.

作者信息

Chawla Anita, Peeples Miranda, Li Nanxin, Anhorn Rachel, Ryan Jason, Signorovitch James

机构信息

a Analysis Group, Inc. , Menlo Park , CA , USA.

b Analysis Group, Inc. , Boston , MA , USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):543-552. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1423488. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2017.1423488
PMID:29295635
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the frequency of biopsies and molecular diagnostic testing (human DNA/RNA analysis), anti-cancer drug use (genomically-matched targeted therapy [GMTT], unmatched targeted therapy [UTT], endocrine therapy [ET], and chemotherapy [CT]), and medical service costs among adults with metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Adults diagnosed with metastatic breast, non-small cell lung (NSCLC), colorectal, head and neck, ovarian, and uterine cancer (2010Q1-2015Q1) were identified in the OptumHealth Care Solutions claims database and followed from first metastatic diagnosis for ≥1 month and until the end of data availability. Utilization was assessed for each cancer cohort (all and patients aged ≥65 years); per-patient-per-month (PPPM) medical service costs were assessed for all patients. Testing frequency estimates were applied to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data to estimate the number of untested patients (2010-2014).

RESULTS

Patients with metastatic cancer (n = 8,193; breast [n = 3,414], NSCLC [n = 2,231], colorectal [n = 1,611], head and neck [n = 511], ovarian [n = 275], and uterine [n = 151]) were 63 years old (mean), with 11.1-22.2 months of observation. Biopsy and molecular diagnostic testing frequencies ranged from 7% (uterine) to 73% (ovarian), and from 34% (head and neck) to 52% (breast), respectively. Few were treated with GMTT (breast, 11%; NSCLC, 9%; colorectal, 6%). Treatment with UTT ranged from 0.7% (uterine) to 21% (colorectal). Biopsy, diagnostic testing, and anti-cancer drug therapy were less frequent for those ≥65 years. Medical service costs (PPPM, mean) ranged from $6,618 (head and neck) to $9,940 (ovarian). The estimated number of untested new patients with metastatic cancer was 636,369 (all) and 341,397 (≥65).

LIMITATIONS

In addition to the limitations of claims analyses, diagnostic testing frequency may be under-estimated if patients underwent testing prior to study inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The low frequency of molecular diagnostic testing suggests there are opportunities to better inform management of patients with advanced cancer, particularly decisions to treat with GMTT.

摘要

目的

评估转移性癌症成年患者的活检和分子诊断检测(人类DNA/RNA分析)频率、抗癌药物使用情况(基因组匹配靶向治疗[GMTT]、非匹配靶向治疗[UTT]、内分泌治疗[ET]和化疗[CT])以及医疗服务成本。

方法

在OptumHealth Care Solutions理赔数据库中识别出2010年第一季度至2015年第一季度被诊断为转移性乳腺癌、非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)、结直肠癌、头颈癌、卵巢癌和子宫癌的成年患者,并从首次转移性诊断起随访≥1个月,直至数据可用期末。评估每个癌症队列(所有患者以及年龄≥65岁的患者)的利用率;评估所有患者的每月人均医疗服务成本(PPPM)。将检测频率估计值应用于监测、流行病学和最终结果计划数据,以估计未检测患者的数量(2010 - 2014年)。

结果

转移性癌症患者(n = 8193;乳腺癌[n = 3414]、NSCLC[n = 2231]、结直肠癌[n = 1611]、头颈癌[n = 511]、卵巢癌[n = 275]和子宫癌[n = 151])的平均年龄为63岁,观察时间为11.1 - 22.2个月。活检和分子诊断检测频率分别为7%(子宫癌)至73%(卵巢癌),以及34%(头颈癌)至52%(乳腺癌)。接受GMTT治疗的患者很少(乳腺癌,11%;NSCLC,9%;结直肠癌,6%)。接受UTT治疗的比例从0.7%(子宫癌)至21%(结直肠癌)不等。65岁及以上患者的活检、诊断检测和抗癌药物治疗频率较低。医疗服务成本(PPPM,平均值)从6618美元(头颈癌)至9940美元(卵巢癌)不等。估计未检测到的转移性癌症新患者数量为636369例(所有患者)和341397例(年龄≥65岁)。

局限性

除了理赔分析的局限性外,如果患者在纳入研究之前接受了检测,诊断检测频率可能被低估。

结论

分子诊断检测频率较低表明有机会更好地为晚期癌症患者的管理提供信息,特别是关于GMTT治疗的决策。

相似文献

1
Real-world utilization of molecular diagnostic testing and matched drug therapies in the treatment of metastatic cancers.分子诊断检测与匹配药物疗法在转移性癌症治疗中的真实世界应用。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):543-552. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1423488. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
Comparison of medical costs and healthcare resource utilization of post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving everolimus-based therapy or chemotherapy: a retrospective claims database analysis.接受依维莫司治疗或化疗的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌绝经后妇女的医疗费用和医疗资源利用情况比较:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
J Med Econ. 2016;19(4):414-23. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1131704.
3
Cost drivers for breast, lung, and colorectal cancer care in a commercially insured population over a 6-month episode: an economic analysis from a health plan perspective.从健康保险计划角度对商业保险人群6个月内乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌护理的成本驱动因素进行的经济分析。
J Med Econ. 2017 Oct;20(10):1018-1023. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1339353. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
4
Budget impact analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者综合基因组分析的预算影响分析
J Med Econ. 2019 Feb;22(2):140-150. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1549056. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.基于肿瘤分子谱的分子靶向治疗与晚期癌症的常规治疗(SHIVA):一项多中心、开放标签、概念验证、随机、对照的 2 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1324-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00188-6. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
6
Economic burden of selected adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.≥65 岁转移性肾细胞癌患者中特定不良事件的经济负担。
J Med Econ. 2013 Nov;16(11):1300-6. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.838570. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
7
An evaluation of the healthcare costs of metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective matched cohort study.转移性乳腺癌的医疗成本评估:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 29;100(43):e27567. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027567.
8
Patterns of treatment, healthcare utilization and costs by lines of therapy in metastatic breast cancer in a large insured US population.在一个大型美国参保人群中,转移性乳腺癌的治疗模式、医疗保健利用和各治疗线的费用。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Mar;2(2):195-206. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.1.
9
Molecular testing patterns in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.转移性非小细胞肺癌的分子检测模式
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e60-7.
10
The economic burden of metastatic breast cancer: a U.S. managed care perspective.转移性乳腺癌的经济负担:美国管理式医疗视角。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jul;134(2):815-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2097-2. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Review on the Clinical Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for the Management of Advanced Cancer.下一代测序检测在晚期癌症管理中的临床影响的全面综述
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Jun;7:e2200715. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00715.
2
The global research of bladder cancer immunotherapy from 2012 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis.2012年至2021年膀胱癌免疫治疗的全球研究:一项文献计量分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 14;12:999203. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.999203. eCollection 2022.
3
Exploration of PCORnet Data Resources for Assessing Use of Molecular-Guided Cancer Treatment.
探索 PCORnet 数据资源以评估分子指导的癌症治疗的应用。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Aug;4:724-735. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00142.
4
Real-world treatment and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung Cancer: a German retrospective data analysis.真实世界中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗及生存状况:一项德国回顾性数据分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06738-z.
5
Low clinical adoption of tumor genomic profiling: cause for concern?肿瘤基因组分析在临床中的低采用率:值得担忧吗?
J Med Econ. 2018 Jul;21(7):721-723. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1470978. Epub 2018 May 15.