• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[丹麦2型糖尿病管理中的跨部门合作]

[Cross-sectoral collaboration in type 2 diabetes management in Denmark].

作者信息

Munch Lene, Røder Michael E, Rasmussen Ida H, Middelfart Helle, Kaarsberg Niels, Bennich Birgitte, Knop Fhilip K, Vilsbøll Tina

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Jan 1;180(1).

PMID:29298738
Abstract

To optimize medical care, Danish guidelines for type 2 diabetes emphasize cross-sectoral collaboration. Risk stratification is recommended as a model of organizing care in terms of distributing tasks and responsibilities between primary and secondary healthcare sectors. Collaboration between the sectors is expected to be beneficial for patients and ensure rational utilization of resources. Challenges such as inter-sectoral communication, sharing of data and unambiguous responsibility underline the need for continuous optimization of the organization of cross-sectorial diabetes management.

摘要

为优化医疗服务,丹麦2型糖尿病指南强调跨部门协作。建议进行风险分层,作为一种在初级和二级医疗保健部门之间分配任务和责任的护理组织模式。各部门之间的协作预计将对患者有益,并确保资源的合理利用。跨部门沟通、数据共享和责任明确等挑战凸显了持续优化跨部门糖尿病管理组织的必要性。

相似文献

1
[Cross-sectoral collaboration in type 2 diabetes management in Denmark].[丹麦2型糖尿病管理中的跨部门合作]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Jan 1;180(1).
2
The role of 'mediators' of communication in health professionals' intersectoral collaboration: An ethnographically inspired study.沟通“中介者”在卫生专业人员跨部门合作中的作用:一项受民族志启发的研究。
Nurs Inq. 2019 Oct;26(4):e12310. doi: 10.1111/nin.12310. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
3
Computer support for shared care of diabetes: findings from a Danish case.糖尿病共享护理的计算机支持:来自丹麦一个案例的研究结果
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:389-94.
4
[Organization of treatment and control of type 2 diabetic patients].[2型糖尿病患者的治疗与管理组织]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2012 Sep 10;174(37):2159-62.
5
[Takeover of Cross-Sectoral Care by Private Providers? - Pro].私人供应商接管跨部门护理?- 赞成方
Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Apr;44(3):125-126. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102407. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Intersectoral collaboration for the prevention and control of vector borne diseases to support the implementation of a global strategy: A systematic review.部门间协作预防和控制病媒传播疾病以支持全球战略实施:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204659. eCollection 2018.
7
[Takeover of Cross-Sectoral Care by Private Providers? - Contra].[私人供应商接管跨部门护理?——反对意见]
Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Apr;44(3):126-127. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101605. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
8
Experiences and challenges to cross-sectoral care reported by patients with low back pain. A qualitative interview study.腰痛患者报告的跨部门护理的经验和挑战。一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4952-x.
9
Measuring integrated care.衡量整合式照护。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245.
10
Perceptions of public health and cross-sectoral collaboration in low SES neighbourhoods in Denmark.丹麦社会经济地位较低 neighbourhoods 中公众对公共卫生和跨部门合作的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):e21-e31. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day098.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectoral health interventions to improve the well-being of people living with type 2 diabetes: a scoping review protocol.跨部门卫生干预措施改善 2 型糖尿病患者的健康状况:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 21;14(5):e080659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080659.
2
Does socioeconomic status make a difference? A register-based study on the extent to which cardiovascular screening in patients with inflammatory arthritis leads to recommended follow-up in general practice.社会经济地位有影响吗?一项基于登记的研究,探讨炎症性关节炎患者的心血管筛查在多大程度上导致了在普通实践中的推荐随访。
RMD Open. 2020 Aug;6(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000940.