Orwat Kelly P, Beckham Thomas H, Cooper Samuel Lewis, Ashenafi Michael S, Anderson Michael Bret, Guimaraes Marcelo, Yamada Ricardo, Marshall David T
Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Dec;8(6):1072-1078. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.06.18.
Hepatic malignancies are common including primary malignancies and metastases. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an important treatment option. We reviewed safety and efficacy of (TARE) in our patients to identify factors that may impact treatment outcomes in a heterogeneous population.
All patients that received TARE at the Medical University of South Carolina from March 2006 through May of 2014 were included. Kaplan-Meier estimates on overall survival (OS) from date of first procedure are reported. Potential prognostic factors for OS were evaluated using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.
In the 114 patients that received TARE at our institution, median follow-up was 6.4 months (range, 0-86 months) with the following histologies: colorectal (CR) n=55, hepatocellular (HC) n=20, cholangiocarcinoma (CC) n=16, neuroendocrine (NE) n=12, breast (BR) n=6, other n=5. At least 1 line of prior systemic therapy was noted in 79% of patients. Median OS was significantly better with NE and BR histology, and in those with normal albumin levels. With an albumin >3.4 median OS was 10.3 months, but was only 3.1 months with an albumin <3 g/dL. Grade ≥2 toxicity was observed in 22 patients (19.3%) including 9 (7.9%) with Grade 3 and 1 (0.9%) with Grade 4 toxicity.
TARE is a relatively safe and effective treatment for intrahepatic malignancies. Patients with NE and BR histology as well as those with better hepatic synthetic function were associated with significantly better survival. Our data suggest that patients with albumin below 3 g/dL may not derive significant benefit from TARE.
肝脏恶性肿瘤很常见,包括原发性恶性肿瘤和转移瘤。经动脉放射性栓塞(TARE)是一种重要的治疗选择。我们回顾了TARE在我们患者中的安全性和有效性,以确定可能影响异质性人群治疗结果的因素。
纳入2006年3月至2014年5月在南卡罗来纳医科大学接受TARE治疗的所有患者。报告自首次治疗日期起的总生存(OS)的Kaplan-Meier估计值。使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型评估OS的潜在预后因素。
在我们机构接受TARE治疗的114例患者中,中位随访时间为6.4个月(范围0 - 86个月),组织学类型如下:结直肠癌(CR)n = 55、肝细胞癌(HC)n = 20、胆管癌(CC)n = 16、神经内分泌癌(NE)n = 12、乳腺癌(BR)n = 6、其他n = 5。79%的患者至少接受过一线先前的全身治疗。NE和BR组织学类型以及白蛋白水平正常的患者,中位OS明显更好。白蛋白>3.4时,中位OS为10.3个月,但白蛋白<3 g/dL时仅为3.1个月。22例患者(19.3%)观察到≥2级毒性,包括9例(7.9%)3级毒性和1例(0.9%)4级毒性。
TARE是一种治疗肝内恶性肿瘤相对安全有效的方法。具有NE和BR组织学类型以及肝脏合成功能较好的患者,生存明显更好。我们的数据表明,白蛋白低于3 g/dL的患者可能无法从TARE中获得显著益处。