Hadrup Niels, Bengtson Stefan, Jacobsen Nicklas R, Jackson Petra, Nocun Marek, Saber Anne T, Jensen Keld A, Wallin Håkan, Vogel Ulla
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé, DK Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.
Mutagenesis. 2017 Dec 31;32(6):581-597. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gex042.
Intratracheal instillation serves as a model for inhalation exposure. However, for this, materials are dispersed in appropriate media that may influence toxicity. We tested whether different intratracheal instillation dispersion media influence the pulmonary toxicity of different nanomaterials. Rodents were intratracheally instilled with 162 µg/mouse/1620 µg/rat carbon black (CB), 67 µg/mouse titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2) or 54 µg/mouse carbon nanotubes (CNT). The dispersion media were as follows: water (CB, TiO2); 2% serum in water (CB, CNT, TiO2); 0.05% serum albumin in water (CB, CNT, TiO2); 10% bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in 0.9% NaCl (CB), 10% bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in water (CB) or 0.1% Tween-80 in water (CB). Inflammation was measured as pulmonary influx of neutrophils into bronchoalveolar fluid, and DNA damage as DNA strand breaks in BAL cells by comet assay. Inflammation was observed for all nanomaterials (except 38-nm TiO2) in all dispersion media. For CB, inflammation was dispersion medium dependent. Increased levels of DNA strand breaks for CB were observed only in water, 2% serum and 10% BAL fluid in 0.9% NaCl. No dispersion medium-dependent effects on genotoxicity were observed for TiO2, whereas CNT in 2% serum induced higher DNA strand break levels than in 0.05% serum albumin. In conclusion, the dispersion medium was a determinant of CB-induced inflammation and genotoxicity. Water seemed to be the best dispersion medium to mimic CB inhalation, exhibiting DNA strand breaks with only limited inflammation. The influence of dispersion media on nanomaterial toxicity should be considered in the planning of intratracheal investigations.
气管内滴注可作为吸入暴露的一种模型。然而,在此过程中,材料会分散于可能影响毒性的适当介质中。我们测试了不同的气管内滴注分散介质是否会影响不同纳米材料的肺部毒性。给啮齿动物气管内滴注162 µg/小鼠/1620 µg/大鼠炭黑(CB)、67 µg/小鼠二氧化钛纳米颗粒(TiO₂)或54 µg/小鼠碳纳米管(CNT)。分散介质如下:水(CB、TiO₂);水中2%血清(CB、CNT、TiO₂);水中0.05%血清白蛋白(CB、CNT、TiO₂);0.9%氯化钠中10%支气管肺泡灌洗液(CB)、水中10%支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液(CB)或水中0.1%吐温-80(CB)。炎症通过中性粒细胞向支气管肺泡液中的肺内流入来衡量,DNA损伤通过彗星试验检测BAL细胞中的DNA链断裂来衡量。在所有分散介质中,所有纳米材料(除38纳米TiO₂外)均观察到炎症。对于CB,炎症取决于分散介质。仅在水、2%血清和0.9%氯化钠中的10%BAL液中观察到CB的DNA链断裂水平升高。未观察到TiO₂对遗传毒性有分散介质依赖性影响,而2%血清中的CNT比0.05%血清白蛋白中的CNT诱导更高的DNA链断裂水平。总之,分散介质是CB诱导炎症和遗传毒性的一个决定因素。水似乎是模拟CB吸入的最佳分散介质,仅表现出有限炎症的DNA链断裂。在气管内研究的规划中应考虑分散介质对纳米材料毒性的影响。