a Centre for Research in Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities , University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.
Glob Public Health. 2018 Mar;13(3):276-287. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1414282. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
Transnational Global Health programmes planned and financed in the North and executed in the Global South usually involve some transfer of capacity between sites or capacity building in place. Capacity investment in the form of skills, knowledge, experience and equipment is often assumed to 'flow' between countries, laboratories and institutions, following the trajectories of mobile subjects in the knowledge economy. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Danish and East African scientists, this paper considers the mobilities that underpin scientific capacity building, drawing attention to the paradoxical in ways in which these programmes produce stasis and fixity, as well as mobility and exchange.
跨国全球卫生计划通常由北方策划和资助,在南方全球实施,其中涉及到一些站点之间的能力转移或就地能力建设。以技能、知识、经验和设备形式进行的能力投资通常被认为是在知识经济中,随着流动主体的轨迹,在国家、实验室和机构之间“流动”。本文通过对丹麦和东非科学家的深入访谈,考虑了支撑科学能力建设的流动,提请注意这些计划在产生停滞和固定性以及流动性和交流方面的矛盾方式。