• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[复合材料与汞合金:体内耐磨性的比较测量:1年结果]

[Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].

作者信息

Meier C, Lutz F

出版信息

SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1979 Mar;89(3):203-12.

PMID:293032
Abstract

A method for the in-vivo measurement of wear resistance of restorative materials is described. A profilometer is used to record the reduction in vertical dimension of the test material's occlusal surface. This loss of substance is calculated as the wear resistance index. The technique was used in a 13 month clinical evaluation of 3 different restorative materials, Adaptic, Amalgam (Dispersalloy) and Estic microfill. The procedure is simple in execution and very accurate. Statistical analysis has shown significant differences in wear resistance of the examined materials independent of patient variation. Attrition and abrasion were definitely greater with a standard composite material (Adaptic) than with amalgam and a test composite (Estic microfill). The newly developed composite material utilizing extremely fine filler particles of pyrogenic SiO2 (Estic microfill) was shown to be comparable to amalgam in wear resistance during the 13-month test period.

摘要

描述了一种用于体内测量修复材料耐磨性的方法。使用轮廓仪记录测试材料咬合面垂直尺寸的减小。这种物质损失被计算为耐磨指数。该技术用于对3种不同修复材料(Adaptic、银汞合金(Dispersalloy)和Estic微填料)进行的为期13个月的临床评估。该程序执行简单且非常准确。统计分析表明,所检查材料的耐磨性存在显著差异,与患者差异无关。标准复合材料(Adaptic)的磨耗和磨损肯定比银汞合金和测试复合材料(Estic微填料)更大。在13个月的测试期内,新开发的利用热解二氧化硅极细填料颗粒的复合材料(Estic微填料)在耐磨性方面与银汞合金相当。

相似文献

1
[Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].[复合材料与汞合金:体内耐磨性的比较测量:1年结果]
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1979 Mar;89(3):203-12.
2
[Abrasion measurements in vivo in occlusal composite and amalgam fillings].[咬合复合树脂和汞合金充填物的体内磨损测量]
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1978 Sep;33(9):617-22.
3
[Comparative in vivo wear-resistance measurements between amalgam and composite materials. Results after 2 years].[汞合金与复合材料的体内耐磨性比较测量。2年后的结果]
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1980 Apr;35(4):489-92.
4
Wear of dental amalgam.牙科汞合金的磨损
J Biomed Mater Res. 1977 Jul;11(4):513-23. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820110407.
5
Should I be using amalgam or composite restorative materials?我应该使用汞合金还是复合修复材料?
Int Dent J. 1975 Dec;25(4):236-41.
6
Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator.使用新型多模式口腔磨损模拟器评估复合磨损。
Dent Mater. 1996 Jul;12(4):218-26. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80026-1.
7
Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes.近中-咬合-远中汞合金修复体:长达4年的体内定量数据。汞合金替代品研发的数据库。
Quintessence Int. 1994 Mar;25(3):185-90.
8
Simulated oral wear of packable composites.可填充复合材料的模拟口腔磨损。
Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):830-7.
9
Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods.体内磨损与六种实验室磨损方法的相关性。
Dent Mater. 2012 Sep;28(9):961-73. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
10
[Influence of finishing method on abrasion resistance of composite resins and amalgam].[修整方法对复合树脂和汞合金耐磨性的影响]
Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba. 1978;7(1):103-11.