Suppr超能文献

复杂性与非复杂性急性阑尾炎的微生物学分析

Microbiologic Analysis of Complicated and Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.

作者信息

García-Marín Andrés, Pérez-López Mercedes, Martínez-Guerrero Elena, Rodríguez-Cazalla Lorena, Compañ-Rosique Antonio

机构信息

1 Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain; Department of Surgery, University Hospital San Juan de Alicante , Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain .

2 Surgical Nursery, University Hospital San Juan de Alicante , Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain .

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):83-86. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.210.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microbiologic studies suggest that complicated (CAA) and uncomplicated (UAA) acute appendicitis are different entities. Routine peritoneal fluid cultures continue to be controversially related to a low positive rate, found mainly in UAA; to isolation of typical micro-organisms with expected susceptibilities; and to a community-acquired intra-abdominal infection. The aim of this study was to describe microbiologic isolates in CAA and UAA and the usefulness of peritoneal fluid cultures to determine the susceptibilities to our antibiotic therapy guidelines.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of a prospective database collected at University San Juan Hospital (Spain) between June 2014 and June 2017. Complicated acute appendicitis was defined as gangrenous or perforated, whereas UAA was defined as phegmonous or suppurative. Our antibiotic recommendations are amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and in patients with β-lactam allergies, metronidazole plus aztreonam, and an aminoglycoside (gentamicin or tobramycin). Microbiologic cultures were performed in 264 patients, 157 with a CAA and 107 with a UAA.

RESULTS

The positive culture rate was significantly higher in CAA (59%) than in UAA (24.3%). Gram-positive cocci (51.6% CAA; 23.1% UAA), including Streptococcus constellatus (29% CAA; 3.8% UAA), and anaerobes (67.7% CAA; 42.3% UAA) were significantly more common in CAA. The rates of antibiotic resistance were amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 14% (17.2% CAA; 3.8% UAA), gentamicin or tobramycin 8.4% (9.7% CAA; 3.8% UAA), ciprofloxacin 5.9% (6.5% CAA; 3.8% UAA), and ertapenem 10.9% (14% CAA; 0 UAA).

CONCLUSIONS

The culture-positive rate was higher in CAA, with different isolates and susceptibilities than in UAA, identifying a higher frequency of gram-positive cocci (including S. constellatus) and anaerobes. We recommend obtaining peritoneal fluid cultures in CAA, which frequently will lead to a change in the antimicrobial drug therapy guidelines, creating specific recommendations in AA.

摘要

背景

微生物学研究表明,复杂性(CAA)和非复杂性(UAA)急性阑尾炎是不同的疾病实体。常规的腹腔积液培养阳性率较低,这一点仍存在争议,其阳性结果主要见于UAA;培养出具有预期药敏性的典型微生物;以及社区获得性腹腔内感染。本研究的目的是描述CAA和UAA中的微生物分离株,以及腹腔积液培养对于确定我们抗生素治疗指南药敏性的作用。

方法

本研究是对2014年6月至2017年6月在西班牙圣胡安大学医院收集的前瞻性数据库进行的回顾性分析。复杂性急性阑尾炎定义为坏疽性或穿孔性,而UAA定义为蜂窝织炎性或化脓性。我们的抗生素推荐方案是阿莫西林-克拉维酸,对于有β-内酰胺类过敏的患者,使用甲硝唑加氨曲南,以及一种氨基糖苷类药物(庆大霉素或妥布霉素)。对264例患者进行了微生物培养,其中157例为CAA,107例为UAA。

结果

CAA的培养阳性率(59%)显著高于UAA(24.3%)。革兰氏阳性球菌(CAA中占51.6%;UAA中占23.1%),包括星座链球菌(CAA中占29%;UAA中占3.8%),以及厌氧菌(CAA中占67.7%;UAA中占42.3%)在CAA中明显更为常见。抗生素耐药率分别为:阿莫西林-克拉维酸14%(CAA中为17.2%;UAA中为3.8%),庆大霉素或妥布霉素8.4%(CAA中为9.7%;UAA中为3.8%),环丙沙星5.9%(CAA中为6.5%;UAA中为3.8%),厄他培南10.9%(CAA中为14%;UAA中为0)。

结论

CAA的培养阳性率更高,其分离株和药敏性与UAA不同,革兰氏阳性球菌(包括星座链球菌)和厌氧菌的检出频率更高。我们建议对CAA患者进行腹腔积液培养,这通常会导致抗菌药物治疗指南的改变,从而制定针对阑尾炎的具体建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验