McArdle Jill, Sorensen Asta, Fowler Christina I, Sommerness Samantha, Burson Katrina, Kahwati Leila
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Mar;47(2):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.11.014. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
To assess implementation of safety strategies to improve management of births complicated by shoulder dystocia in labor and delivery units.
Mixed-methods implementation evaluation.
SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: Labor and delivery units (N = 18) in 10 states participating in the Safety Program for Perinatal Care (SPPC). Shoulder dystocia is unpredictable, requiring rapid and coordinated action.
Key informants were labor and delivery unit staff who implemented SPPC safety strategies.
INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: The SPPC was implemented by using the TeamSTEPPS teamwork and communication framework and tools, applying safety science principles (standardization, independent checks, and learn from defects) to shoulder dystocia management, and establishing an in situ simulation program focused on shoulder dystocia to practice teamwork and communication skills. Unit staff received training, a toolkit, technical assistance, and unit-specific feedback reports. Quantitative data on unit-reported process improvement measures and qualitative data from staff interviews were used to understand changes in use of safety principles, teamwork/communication, and in situ simulation.
Use of shoulder dystocia safety strategies improved on the units. Differences between baseline and follow-up (10 months) were as follows: in situ simulation (50% vs. 89%), teamwork and communication (67% vs. 94%), standardization (67% to 94%), learning from defects (67% vs. 89%), and independent checks (56% vs. 78%). Interview data showed reasons to address management of shoulder dystocia, various approaches to implement safety practices, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.
Successful management of shoulder dystocia requires a rapid, standardized, and coordinated response. The SPPC strategies to increase safety of shoulder dystocia management are scalable, replicable, and adaptable to unit needs and circumstances.
评估安全策略的实施情况,以改善分娩和接生单位中因肩难产而导致的复杂分娩管理。
混合方法实施评估。
背景/当地问题:参与围产期护理安全计划(SPPC)的10个州的分娩和接生单位(N = 18)。肩难产不可预测,需要迅速且协调一致的行动。
关键信息提供者为实施SPPC安全策略的分娩和接生单位工作人员。
干预措施/测量方法:通过使用团队STEPPS团队合作与沟通框架及工具来实施SPPC,将安全科学原则(标准化、独立检查和从缺陷中学习)应用于肩难产管理,并建立一个专注于肩难产的现场模拟计划以练习团队合作和沟通技巧。单位工作人员接受了培训、工具包、技术援助以及针对单位的反馈报告。关于单位报告的过程改进措施的定量数据和工作人员访谈的定性数据用于了解安全原则、团队合作/沟通以及现场模拟使用情况的变化。
各单位对肩难产安全策略的使用有所改善。基线与随访(10个月)之间的差异如下:现场模拟(50%对89%)、团队合作与沟通(67%对94%)、标准化(67%至94%)、从缺陷中学习(67%对89%)以及独立检查(56%对78%)。访谈数据显示了应对肩难产管理的原因、实施安全措施的各种方法以及实施的促进因素和障碍。
成功管理肩难产需要快速、标准化且协调一致的应对措施。提高肩难产管理安全性的SPPC策略具有可扩展性、可复制性,并且能够适应单位需求和情况。