• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[初级医疗保健服务与在难以服务地区引入新型护理模式:一项人口调查]

[Primary Healthcare Provision and Introduction of New Models of Care in Hard to Serve Regions: A Population Survey].

作者信息

Tangermann Ulla, Kleij Kim-Sarah, Krauth Christian, Amelung Volker Eric

机构信息

Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Jun;81(6):498-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119084. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-119084
PMID:29304517
Abstract

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

One of the central challenges in health policy is to ensure nationwide provision of primary healthcare services. However, it is not clear how the general public rates the current primary healthcare provision in their region. Furthermore, there is very little information on whether people are willing to make use of new models of care that could contribute to ensuring a nationwide provision of healthcare services. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyse the general public's ratings of the local primary healthcare provision as well as their acceptance of selected new models of care. Furthermore, potential differences in the ratings of the population between hard to serve regions and normal regions will be analysed.

METHODOLOGY

Focus group discussions and a literature review were conducted in order to develop a questionnaire to elicit the expectations of the population concerning the local provision of primary healthcare as well as their acceptance of new models of care. A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2,000 persons in 8 regions in Lower Saxony.

RESULTS

The adjusted response rate of the postal survey was 51% (n=996). 97% of respondents saw a general practitioner regularly, with 5.4 visits per year on average. Patients could reach the practice in 13 min on average. Respondents predominantly rated the current healthcare provision as being good. However, the majority of respondents expected the local primary healthcare provision to deteriorate in the future. New models of care most preferred by the respondents were the delegation of medical tasks to non-medical professionals and mobility-oriented models. On the other hand, the provision of healthcare via telemedicine was rejected.

DISCUSSION

According to the results of this study, respondents believe that new models of care can play an important role in ensuring the nationwide provision of healthcare services. Introducing, at an early stage, those new models of care that people accept could contribute to ensuring a sustainable provision of primary healthcare services. Furthermore, the introduction of these new models of care could reduce the public's concerns regarding a worsening provision of primary healthcare services in their regions. Additionally, pilot projects with those new models of care that are rather rejected might increase acceptance with these models of care if they prove to be successful.

摘要

研究目的

卫生政策的核心挑战之一是确保在全国范围内提供初级医疗服务。然而,目前尚不清楚公众如何评价其所在地区当前的初级医疗服务。此外,关于人们是否愿意采用有助于确保全国范围内提供医疗服务的新型护理模式的信息非常少。因此,本研究的目的是分析公众对当地初级医疗服务的评价以及他们对选定新型护理模式的接受程度。此外,还将分析难以服务地区和正常地区人群评价的潜在差异。

方法

进行焦点小组讨论和文献综述,以制定一份问卷,了解公众对当地初级医疗服务的期望以及他们对新型护理模式的接受程度。向德国下萨克森州8个地区的2000人随机样本发送了邮政问卷。

结果

邮政调查的调整后回复率为51%(n = 996)。97%的受访者定期看全科医生,平均每年就诊5.4次。患者平均13分钟就能到达诊所。受访者大多认为当前的医疗服务良好。然而,大多数受访者预计当地的初级医疗服务未来会恶化。受访者最喜欢的新型护理模式是将医疗任务委托给非医疗专业人员以及以移动性为导向的模式。另一方面,通过远程医疗提供医疗服务遭到了拒绝。

讨论

根据本研究的结果,受访者认为新型护理模式在确保全国范围内提供医疗服务方面可以发挥重要作用。尽早引入人们接受的新型护理模式有助于确保初级医疗服务的可持续提供。此外,引入这些新型护理模式可以减少公众对其所在地区初级医疗服务恶化的担忧。此外,如果那些遭到相当程度拒绝的新型护理模式的试点项目证明是成功的,可能会增加人们对这些模式的接受度。

相似文献

1
[Primary Healthcare Provision and Introduction of New Models of Care in Hard to Serve Regions: A Population Survey].[初级医疗保健服务与在难以服务地区引入新型护理模式:一项人口调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Jun;81(6):498-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119084. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
2
Which strategies might improve local primary healthcare in Germany? An explorative study from a local government point of view.哪些策略可能改善德国当地的初级医疗保健?一项从地方政府视角进行的探索性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 20;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0696-z.
3
Reasons for choosing or refusing care from a nurse practitioner: Results from a national population-based survey.选择或拒绝护士从业者护理的原因:一项基于全国人口的调查结果。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3668-3676. doi: 10.1111/jan.14176. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
4
Primary palliative Care in General Practice - study protocol of a three-stage mixed-methods organizational health services research study.初级缓和医疗在全科医学中的应用——一项三阶段混合方法组织卫生服务研究的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 30;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0276-6.
5
Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment.德国初级保健服务提供的公众偏好 - 离散选择实验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 11;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0967-y.
6
A baseline survey of the Primary Healthcare system in south eastern Nigeria.尼日利亚东南部初级医疗保健系统的基线调查。
Health Policy. 2006 Jul;77(2):182-201. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
7
Dual provision or duplication? A survey of family planning provision.双重提供还是重复?计划生育服务调查。
Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):41-4.
8
Task-Sharing Between Pediatricians and Non-Physician Healthcare Professionals in Outpatient Child Health Care in Germany: Assessment of Need and Acceptance for Concept Development.儿科医生与非医师医疗保健专业人员在德国门诊儿童保健中的任务分担:对概念开发的需求和接受度评估。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020969299. doi: 10.1177/0046958020969299.
9
Mobility concepts and access to health care in a rural district in Germany: a mixed methods approach.德国一个农村地区的就医出行概念与医疗服务可及性:一种混合方法研究路径
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 2;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0733-6.
10
[Sociodemographic and health-related determinants of health care utilisation and access to primary and specialist care: Results of a nationwide population survey in Germany (2006-2016)].[社会人口统计学及与健康相关的医疗保健利用和获得初级及专科护理的决定因素:德国全国人口调查结果(2006 - 2016年)]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Oct;126:52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Reaching the unreachable: a mixed-method evaluation of multidimensional healthcare model addressing the healthcare service gaps in hard-to-reach Northern riverine Bangladesh.触及难以触及之处:对解决孟加拉国北部偏远河域医疗服务差距的多维医疗模式的混合方法评估
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 14;83(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01592-6.
2
[Support for General Practitioners in the Care of Patients with Complex Needs: A Questionnaire Survey of General Practitioners in Berlin].[为全科医生提供照顾复杂需求患者的支持:对柏林全科医生的问卷调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Oct;83(10):844-853. doi: 10.1055/a-1173-9225. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Patient Input in Regional Healthcare Planning-A Meaningful Contribution.
患者参与区域医疗保健规划——有意义的贡献。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 5;16(19):3754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193754.
4
Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment.德国初级保健服务提供的公众偏好 - 离散选择实验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 11;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0967-y.