Mohanty Vaibhav, McKinnon Emilie T, Helpern Joseph A, Jensen Jens H
Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May;48:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
To compare estimates for the diffusional kurtosis in brain as obtained from a cumulant expansion (CE) of the diffusion MRI (dMRI) signal and from q-space (QS) imaging.
For the CE estimates of the kurtosis, the CE was truncated to quadratic order in the b-value and fit to the dMRI signal for b-values from 0 up to 2000s/mm. For the QS estimates, b-values ranging from 0 up to 10,000s/mm were used to determine the diffusion displacement probability density function (dPDF) via Stejskal's formula. The kurtosis was then calculated directly from the second and fourth order moments of the dPDF. These two approximations were studied for in vivo human data obtained on a 3T MRI scanner using three orthogonal diffusion encoding directions.
The whole brain mean values for the CE and QS kurtosis estimates differed by 16% or less in each of the considered diffusion encoding directions, and the Pearson correlation coefficients all exceeded 0.85. Nonetheless, there were large discrepancies in many voxels, particularly those with either very high or very low kurtoses relative to the mean values.
Estimates of the diffusional kurtosis in brain obtained using CE and QS approximations are strongly correlated, suggesting that they encode similar information. However, for the choice of b-values employed here, there may be substantial differences, depending on the properties of the diffusion microenvironment in each voxel.
比较通过扩散磁共振成像(dMRI)信号的累积量展开(CE)和q空间(QS)成像获得的脑内扩散峰度估计值。
对于峰度的CE估计,在b值中把CE截断到二次项,并对b值从0到2000 s/mm的dMRI信号进行拟合。对于QS估计,使用范围从0到10,000 s/mm的b值,通过斯泰卡尔公式确定扩散位移概率密度函数(dPDF)。然后直接从dPDF的二阶和四阶矩计算峰度。使用三个正交扩散编码方向,对在3T磁共振成像扫描仪上获得的体内人体数据研究了这两种近似方法。
在每个考虑的扩散编码方向上,CE和QS峰度估计的全脑平均值相差16%或更少,并且皮尔逊相关系数均超过0.85。尽管如此,在许多体素中存在很大差异,特别是那些相对于平均值具有非常高或非常低峰度的体素。
使用CE和QS近似获得的脑内扩散峰度估计值高度相关,表明它们编码相似的信息。然而,对于此处采用的b值选择,可能存在实质性差异,这取决于每个体素中扩散微环境的特性。