FluxSense AB, SE-41296 Göteborg, Sweden.
Department of Environmental Engineering, Building 115, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Water Res. 2018 Mar 15;131:299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Plant-integrated and on-site gas emissions were quantified from a Swedish wastewater treatment plant by applying several optical analytical techniques and measurement methods. Plant-integrated CH emission rates, measured using mobile ground-based remote sensing methods, varied between 28.5 and 33.5 kg CH h, corresponding to an average emission factor of 5.9% as kg CH (kg CH) , whereas NO emissions varied between 4.0 and 6.4 kg h, corresponding to an average emission factor of 1.5% as kg NO-N (kg TN ) . Plant-integrated NH emissions were around 0.4 kg h, corresponding to an average emission factor of 0.11% as kg NH-N (kg TN ) . On-site emission measurements showed that the largest proportions of CH (70%) and NH (66%) were emitted from the sludge treatment line (mainly biosolid stockpiles and the thickening and dewatering units), while most of the NO (82%) was emitted from nitrifying trickling filters. In addition to being the most important CH source, stockpiles of biosolids exhibited different emissions when the sludge digesters were operated in series compared to in parallel, thus slightly increasing substrate retention time in the digesters. Lower CH emissions and generally higher NO and NH emissions were observed when the digesters were operated in series. Loading biosolids onto trucks for off-site treatment generally resulted in higher CH, NO, and NH emissions from the biosolid stockpiles. On-site CH and NO emission quantifications were approximately two-thirds of the plant-integrated emission quantifications, which may be explained by the different timeframes of the approaches and that not all emission sources were identified during on-site investigation. Off-site gas emission quantifications, using ground-based remote sensing methods, thus seem to provide more comprehensive total plant emissions rates, whereas on-site measurements provide insights into emissions from individual sources.
应用几种光学分析技术和测量方法,从瑞典一家污水处理厂量化了植物集成和现场气体排放。使用移动地面遥感方法测量的植物集成 CH 排放率在 28.5 至 33.5kgCHh 之间,平均排放因子为 5.9%(kgCH(kgCH)),而 NO 排放率在 4.0 至 6.4kg h 之间,平均排放因子为 1.5%(kgNO-N(kgTN))。植物集成 NH 排放约为 0.4kg h,平均排放因子为 0.11%(kgNH-N(kgTN))。现场排放测量表明,CH(70%)和 NH(66%)的最大比例来自污泥处理线(主要是生物固体堆存和浓缩脱水单元),而大部分 NO(82%)来自硝化滴滤器。生物固体堆存不仅是最重要的 CH 源,当污泥消化池串联运行时,与并联运行相比,其排放也有所不同,从而略微增加了消化池中的基质保留时间。当消化池串联运行时,CH 排放量较低,而 NO 和 NH 排放量通常较高。将生物固体装载到卡车上进行场外处理通常会导致生物固体堆存的 CH、NO 和 NH 排放量增加。现场 CH 和 NO 排放量化约为植物集成排放量化的三分之二,这可能是由于方法的不同时间框架以及在现场调查期间未识别出所有排放源。使用地面遥感方法进行场外气体排放量化,因此似乎提供了更全面的全厂排放率,而现场测量则提供了对单个来源排放的深入了解。