• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争对保费的影响:以联合健康保险公司 2015 年进入平价医疗法案市场为例,采用工具变量法。

The effects of competition on premiums: using United Healthcare's 2015 entry into Affordable Care Act's marketplaces as an instrumental variable.

机构信息

Department of Economics,University of Tampa,Tampa,FL,USA.

College of Business,University of Tampa,Tampa,FL,USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Jul;14(3):374-399. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000263. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133117000263
PMID:29306342
Abstract

One goal of the Affordable Care Act is to increase insurance coverage by improving competition and lowering premiums. To facilitate this goal, the federal government enacted online marketplaces in the 395 rating areas spanning 34 states that chose not to establish their own state-run marketplaces. Few multivariate regression studies analyzing the effects of competition on premiums suffer from endogeneity, due to simultaneity and omitted variable biases. However, United Healthcare's decision to enter these marketplaces in 2015 provides the researcher with an opportunity to address this endogeneity problem. Exploiting the variation caused by United Healthcare's entry decision as an instrument for competition, we study the impact of competition on premiums during the first 2 years of these marketplaces. Combining panel data from five different sources and controlling for 12 variables, we find that one more insurer in a rating area leads to a 6.97% reduction in the second-lowest-priced silver plan premium, which is larger than the estimated effects in existing literature. Furthermore, we run a threshold analysis and find that competition's effects on premiums become statistically insignificant if there are four or more insurers in a rating area. These findings are robust to alternative measures of premiums, inclusion of a non-linear term in the regression models and a county-level analysis.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》的目标之一是通过提高竞争力和降低保费来增加保险覆盖范围。为了实现这一目标,联邦政府在 34 个选择不建立自己的州立市场的州的 395 个评级区域内建立了在线市场。由于同时性和遗漏变量偏差,很少有分析竞争对保费影响的多元回归研究受到内生性的影响。然而,联合健康保险公司在 2015 年决定进入这些市场,为研究人员提供了一个解决这个内生性问题的机会。我们利用联合健康保险公司进入市场的决定所引起的变化作为竞争的工具,研究了这些市场头两年竞争对保费的影响。我们结合了来自五个不同来源的面板数据,并控制了 12 个变量,发现一个评级区域内有一个以上的保险公司,会导致第二低价位的银计划保费降低 6.97%,这比现有文献中的估计效果还要大。此外,我们进行了一个门槛分析,发现如果一个评级区域内有四个或更多的保险公司,竞争对保费的影响在统计上就变得不显著了。这些发现对于保费的替代衡量标准、回归模型中非线性项的包含以及县级分析都是稳健的。

相似文献

1
The effects of competition on premiums: using United Healthcare's 2015 entry into Affordable Care Act's marketplaces as an instrumental variable.竞争对保费的影响:以联合健康保险公司 2015 年进入平价医疗法案市场为例,采用工具变量法。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Jul;14(3):374-399. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000263. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Insurer Competition In Federally Run Marketplaces Is Associated With Lower Premiums.联邦运营的医保市场中的保险公司竞争与更低的保费相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2027-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0548.
3
Are Integrated Plan Providers Associated With Lower Premiums on the Health Insurance Marketplaces?综合计划提供商与医疗保险市场上较低的保费有关联吗?
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Apr;75(2):232-259. doi: 10.1177/1077558717692408. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
As Insurers Exit Affordable Care Act Marketplaces, So Do Consumers.随着保险公司退出平价医疗法案市场,消费者也随之离开。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1893-1901. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05475.
5
What drives insurer participation and premiums in the Federally-Facilitated Marketplace?是什么推动保险公司参与联邦政府推动的医保市场并确定保费?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Dec;17(4):395-412. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9215-y. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
6
ACA Marketplace premiums and competition among hospitals and physician practices.ACA 市场保费和医院及医师执业间的竞争。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Feb;24(2):85-90.
7
Implementing the Affordable Care Act: Promoting Competition in the Individual Marketplaces.实施《平价医疗法案》:促进个人保险市场的竞争。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Feb;4:1-11.
8
Provider networks and health plan premium variation.医疗机构网络与健康计划保费差异。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13447. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
How does expansion of public health insurance affect risk pools and premiums in the market for private health insurance? Evidence from Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces.公共医疗保险的扩张如何影响私人医疗保险市场的风险池和保费?来自医疗补助和平价医疗法案市场的证据。
Health Econ. 2018 Dec;27(12):1877-1903. doi: 10.1002/hec.3809. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
10
Effect Of Population Size On Rural Health Insurance Premiums In The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.人口规模对联邦雇员健康福利计划中农村健康保险保费的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):2041-2047. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00912.

引用本文的文献

1
Price setting in the Brazilian private health insurance sector.巴西私营医疗保险领域的价格制定。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024 Mar;24(1):57-80. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09361-0. Epub 2023 Sep 10.