Schmitt Carol L, Curry Laurel E, Homsi Ghada, Williams Pamela A, Glasgow LaShawn M, Van Hersh Deanna, Willett Jeffrey, Rogers Todd
1 Center for Health Policy Science and Tobacco Research, 6856 RTI International , Washington, DC, USA.
2 Center for Health Policy Science and Tobacco Research, 6856 RTI International , Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2017 Aug;18(3):125-134. doi: 10.1177/1527154417749492. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
Obesity increases the risk for leading causes of death, including cardiovascular disease and some cancers. Midwestern and southern states have the highest obesity rates-in Kansas, one in every three adults is obese. We compared the willingness of Kansas adults and opinion leaders to pay more in taxes to fund obesity prevention policies. In 2014, we asked a representative sample of 2,203 Kansas adults (response rate 15.7%) and 912 opinion leaders (response rate 55%) drawn from elected office and other sectors, including business and health, whether they would pay an additional $50 in annual taxes to support five policies that improve access to healthy foods and opportunities for physical activity. We used adjusted Wald tests to compare public and opinion leaders' responses, and regression analysis to assess whether differences in respondents' gender, age, location (urban/rural), race/ethnicity, and political stance affected results. Adjusting for demographic differences, Kansas adults were more willing than opinion leaders to pay $50 in taxes for each of the five policy interventions. This study demonstrates a willingness among residents of a fiscally conservative state to pay increased taxes for policies that could reduce population obesity rates. Health professionals, including nurses, can use these findings to educate policy makers in Kansas and geopolitically similar states about widespread public support for obesity prevention policies. Public health and other nurses could also apply our methods to assess support for obesity prevention policies in their jurisdictions.
肥胖会增加包括心血管疾病和某些癌症在内的主要死因的风险。中西部和南部各州的肥胖率最高——在堪萨斯州,每三个成年人中就有一个肥胖。我们比较了堪萨斯州成年人和意见领袖为资助肥胖预防政策支付更多税款的意愿。2014年,我们询问了从民选公职以及包括商业和健康在内的其他部门抽取的2203名堪萨斯州成年人(回复率15.7%)和912名意见领袖(回复率55%),他们是否愿意每年额外支付50美元税款以支持五项改善健康食品获取和体育活动机会的政策。我们使用调整后的 Wald 检验来比较公众和意见领袖的回复,并使用回归分析来评估受访者的性别、年龄、地点(城市/农村)、种族/族裔和政治立场的差异是否会影响结果。在调整人口统计学差异后,堪萨斯州成年人比意见领袖更愿意为五项政策干预措施中的每一项支付50美元税款。这项研究表明,在一个财政保守的州,居民愿意为可能降低人口肥胖率的政策支付更多税款。包括护士在内的卫生专业人员可以利用这些发现,向堪萨斯州以及地缘政治上类似的州的政策制定者宣传公众对肥胖预防政策的广泛支持。公共卫生护士和其他护士也可以应用我们的方法来评估其辖区内对肥胖预防政策的支持情况。