Brancheau Daniel, Jain Sachin Kumar Amruthlal, Alexander Patrick B
Division of Cardiology, Providence Heart Institute, Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Southfield, MI, USA Division of Internal Medicine, Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Southfield, MI, USA.
Providence Heart Institute, Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 16001 West Nine Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48075, USA.
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;12(3):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1753944717749738. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
We sought to investigate the rate of radial artery occlusion (RAO) after same-day dual radial artery puncture. The trans-radial arterial approach (TRA) for diagnostic and interventional procedures has risen significantly in the United States. Although becoming more commonly performed, TRA is not without risk, and a potential complication is RAO. The rate of RAO after same-day dual artery puncture is unknown.
A retrospective analysis of 27 patients who underwent same-day dual radial artery puncture for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at our institution (Providence Heart Institute in Southfield, MI, USA) from November 2011 to December 2013 were included after initially presenting for cardiac catheterization at a non-PCI-capable facility. The study patients were asked to follow up for evaluation of the radial artery, including obtaining a duplex ultrasound evaluation.
The mean age of the patients was 65 years old with 66% of the patients being male. Of the 27 study participants, there were no symptoms reported that were related to RAO. Overall, one (3.7%) patient had an absent radial pulse. The modified Allen's test was normal in all of the patients with a mean return of palmar flush time of 4 seconds. Duplex ultrasound revealed subtotal RAO in four (14.8%) patients and no patients experienced total occlusion following the intervention.
Dual radial artery puncture appears to be a well-tolerated and viable strategy in patients that are transferred to a PCI-capable hospital for coronary interventions.
我们试图研究同日双侧桡动脉穿刺后桡动脉闭塞(RAO)的发生率。在美国,用于诊断和介入手术的经桡动脉途径(TRA)显著增加。尽管TRA越来越普遍,但并非没有风险,潜在并发症之一是RAO。同日双侧动脉穿刺后RAO的发生率尚不清楚。
对2011年11月至2013年12月在我们机构(美国密歇根州南菲尔德的普罗维登斯心脏研究所)因经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)而进行同日双侧桡动脉穿刺的27例患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者最初在无PCI能力的机构进行心脏导管插入术。研究患者被要求进行随访以评估桡动脉,包括进行双功超声评估。
患者的平均年龄为65岁,66%为男性。在27名研究参与者中,没有报告与RAO相关的症状。总体而言,1例(3.7%)患者桡动脉搏动消失。所有患者改良艾伦试验均正常,平均手掌充血时间恢复为4秒。双功超声显示4例(14.8%)患者存在部分RAO,干预后无患者发生完全闭塞。
对于转至有PCI能力医院进行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,双侧桡动脉穿刺似乎是一种耐受性良好且可行的策略。