• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟医疗数据传输的监管——跨境生物医学研究管理的行政法视角

Oversight of EU medical data transfers - an administrative law perspective on cross-border biomedical research administration.

作者信息

Reichel Jane

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Technol (Berl). 2017;7(4):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0182-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1007/s12553-017-0182-6
PMID:29308345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5741787/
Abstract

The notion of privacy has long had a central role in human rights law, not least in connection to health and medicine. International, regional and national bodies have enacted a number of binding and non-binding document for physicians and researchers to adhere to, in order to protect the autonomy, dignity and privacy of patients and research subjects. With the development of new technologies, the right to privacy has gained a new perspective; the right to protection of personal data within information and communication technologies. The right to data protection has been attributed an increasing importance within EU law. Accordingly, the use of health data in medical research in general and in biobank-related medical research in particular, has made data protection law highly relevant. In medical research involving biobanks, transferring human biological samples and/or individual health data is taking place on a daily basis. These transfers involve several oversight bodies, institutional review boards (IRBs), research ethics committees, or even data protection authorities. This article investigates the role of these national oversight bodies in the transfer of health data in cross-border research, from an EU law point of view. A special focus is laid on transfer of health data for research purposes from the EU to the US, in the light of the recently enacted EU-US Privacy Shield. The main question posed is how American oversight bodies for medical research can be expected to handle the increasingly strict EU requirements for the processing of health data in medical research review.

摘要

长期以来,隐私概念在人权法中一直占据核心地位,尤其是在与健康和医学相关的领域。国际、区域和国家机构已经制定了一些具有约束力和不具有约束力的文件,供医生和研究人员遵守,以保护患者和研究对象的自主权、尊严和隐私。随着新技术的发展,隐私权有了新的视角;信息和通信技术领域内个人数据保护权。在欧盟法律中,数据保护权的重要性日益凸显。因此,一般医学研究中,尤其是与生物样本库相关的医学研究中健康数据的使用,使得数据保护法具有高度相关性。在涉及生物样本库的医学研究中,人类生物样本和/或个人健康数据的转移每天都在发生。这些转移涉及多个监督机构、机构审查委员会(IRB)、研究伦理委员会,甚至数据保护当局。本文从欧盟法律的角度研究这些国家监督机构在跨境研究中健康数据转移方面的作用。鉴于最近颁布的《欧美隐私护盾》,特别关注从欧盟向美国转移用于研究目的的健康数据。提出的主要问题是,美国医学研究监督机构如何有望在医学研究审查中处理欧盟对健康数据处理日益严格的要求。

相似文献

1
Oversight of EU medical data transfers - an administrative law perspective on cross-border biomedical research administration.欧盟医疗数据传输的监管——跨境生物医学研究管理的行政法视角
Health Technol (Berl). 2017;7(4):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0182-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
2
International transfers of health data between the EU and USA: a sector-specific approach for the USA to ensure an 'adequate' level of protection.欧盟与美国之间的健康数据国际传输:美国确保“充分”保护水平的特定行业方法。
J Law Biosci. 2020 Oct 15;7(1):lsaa055. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa055. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
3
Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after .之后健康数据跨境传输的标准合同条款 。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,翻译可能不太准确,建议补充完整原文以便更精准翻译)
J Law Biosci. 2021 Jun 21;8(1):lsab007. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab007. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
4
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
7
Biobanks as a Central Part of the Finnish Growth and Genomic Strategies: How to Balance Privacy in an Innovation Ecosystem?生物样本库作为芬兰增长与基因组战略的核心部分:如何在创新生态系统中平衡隐私?
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;44(1):24-34. doi: 10.1177/1073110516644187.
8
The new EU-US data protection framework's implications for healthcare.新的欧美数据保护框架对医疗保健的影响。
J Law Biosci. 2024 Sep 27;11(2):lsae022. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsae022. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec.
9
The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research.欧盟通用数据保护条例对科学研究的影响。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Jan 3;11:709. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.709. eCollection 2017.
10
Bridging the European Data Sharing Divide in Genomic Science.弥合基因组科学中的欧洲数据共享鸿沟。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 19;24(10):e37236. doi: 10.2196/37236.

引用本文的文献

1
Paradigm Transformation of Global Health Data Regulation: Challenges in Governance and Human Rights Protection of Cross-Border Data Flows.全球卫生数据监管的范式转变:跨境数据流动治理与人权保护面临的挑战
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Dec 21;17:3291-3304. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S450082. eCollection 2024.
2
Medical Sports Data Privacy Protection Method Based on Legal Risk Control.基于法律风险控制的医疗体育数据隐私保护方法。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 May 8;2021:6630429. doi: 10.1155/2021/6630429. eCollection 2021.
3
Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration.台湾生物银行 3.0 的转型:垂直与水平整合。
J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 6;18(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02451-4.
4
The European General Data Protection Regulation: challenges and considerations for iPSC researchers and biobanks.《欧洲通用数据保护条例》:诱导多能干细胞研究人员和生物样本库面临的挑战与考量
Regen Med. 2017 Sep;12(6):693-703. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0068. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research.迈向全球生物医学研究的伦理安全港。
J Law Biosci. 2014 Feb 14;1(1):3-51. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lst002. eCollection 2014 Mar.
2
International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking (or the Unexpected Virtue of Pluralism).《基因组生物样本库隐私国际准则》(或多元主义的意外益处)
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):690-702. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12312.
3
Biobanks, Data Sharing, and the Drive for a Global Privacy Governance Framework.生物样本库、数据共享与全球隐私治理框架的推动
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):675-89. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12311.
4
Trust me, I'm a medical researcher.相信我,我是一名医学研究人员。
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):501-3. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6221.501.
5
International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data.生物样本和数据共享国际原则宪章
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;23(6):721-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.197. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
6
International ethics harmonization and the global alliance for genomics and health.国际伦理协调与全球基因组学与健康联盟。
Genome Med. 2014 Feb 27;6(2):13. doi: 10.1186/gm530. eCollection 2014.
7
Accountability, governance and biobanks: the ethics and governance committee as guardian or as toothless tiger?责任、治理与生物库:伦理与治理委员会是守护者还是纸老虎?
Health Care Anal. 2011 Sep;19(3):231-46. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0195-7.
8
From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance.从单一生物库到国际网络:发展电子政务。
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0. Epub 2011 Jul 23.