Suppr超能文献

从单一生物库到国际网络:发展电子政务。

From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

Abstract

The future holds the possibility to link and network biobanks, existing biorepositories and reference databases for research purposes in ways that have not been possible before. There is the potential to develop 'research portals' that will enable researchers to access these research resources that are located around the globe with the click of a mouse. In this paper, I will argue that our current governance system for research is unable to provide all of the oversight and accountability mechanisms that are required for this new way of doing research that is based upon flows of data across international borders. For example, our current governance framework for research is nationally based, with a complex system of laws, policies and practice that can be unique to a jurisdiction. It is also evident that many of the nationally based governance bodies in this field do not have the legal powers or expertise to adjudicate on the complex issues, such as privacy and disclosure risks that are raised by cross-border data sharing. In addition, the conceptual underpinning of this research governance structure is based on the "one researcher, one project, one jurisdiction" model. In the conclusion of this paper, I lay out some preliminary ideas as to how this system has to change to accommodate research that is based on networks. I suggest that a move to digital governance mechanisms might be a start to making research governance systems more appropriate for the 21st century.

摘要

未来有可能以前所未有的方式将生物库、现有的生物库和参考数据库链接和联网,用于研究目的。有可能开发“研究门户”,使研究人员只需点击鼠标,就可以访问分布在全球各地的这些研究资源。在本文中,我将论证我们目前的研究治理系统无法提供所有必要的监督和问责机制,以支持这种基于跨越国界的数据流动的新研究方式。例如,我们目前的研究治理框架是基于国家的,具有一套复杂的法律、政策和实践体系,可能在特定司法管辖区内是独一无二的。同样明显的是,该领域许多基于国家的治理机构没有法律权力或专门知识来裁决跨境数据共享所引发的复杂问题,如隐私和披露风险。此外,这种研究治理结构的概念基础是基于“一个研究人员、一个项目、一个司法管辖区”的模式。在本文的结论中,我提出了一些初步的想法,说明为了适应基于网络的研究,这个系统必须做出哪些改变。我建议采用数字治理机制可能是使研究治理系统更适应 21 世纪的一个起点。

相似文献

1
From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance.
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
3
Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa.
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Sep 11;14:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-35.
4
Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):232-42. doi: 10.1159/000336544. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
5
Future-proofing biobanks' governance.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):989-996. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0646-4. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
International Data Sharing in Practice: New Technologies Meet Old Governance.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):231-40. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.0002. Epub 2016 May 20.
7
Commercial biobanks and genetic research: ethical and legal issues.
Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2003;3(3):203-15. doi: 10.2165/00129785-200303030-00006.
8
Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issues.
Pharmacogenomics. 2008 Jun;9(6):773-81. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.6.773.
10
Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research.
Adv Genet. 2008;60:505-44. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(07)00418-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy.
Front Genet. 2024 Jun 14;15:1397156. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156. eCollection 2024.
2
Developing Policy for the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative: Going from National to International.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2023 Jun;21(3):267-274. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0198. Epub 2023 May 16.
3
Towards trust-based governance of health data research.
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Jun;26(2):185-200. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10134-8. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
Looking back: three key lessons from 20 years of shaping Japanese genome research regulations.
J Hum Genet. 2021 Nov;66(11):1039-1041. doi: 10.1038/s10038-021-00923-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
The reconfiguration of biobanks in Europe under the BBMRI-ERIC framework: towards global sharing nodes?
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Oct 1;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00105-3.
6
Genomic data and the dividual self.
Genet Res (Camb). 2019 Dec 11;101:e12. doi: 10.1017/S0016672319000107.
7
Oversight of EU medical data transfers - an administrative law perspective on cross-border biomedical research administration.
Health Technol (Berl). 2017;7(4):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0182-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
The European General Data Protection Regulation: challenges and considerations for iPSC researchers and biobanks.
Regen Med. 2017 Sep;12(6):693-703. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0068. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper.
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):103-116. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0331-7. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
10
Legal & ethical compliance when sharing biospecimen.
Brief Funct Genomics. 2018 Jan 1;17(1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elx008.

本文引用的文献

2
Dealing with data. Challenges and opportunities. Introduction.
Science. 2011 Feb 11;331(6018):692-3. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6018.692.
4
Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issues.
Pharmacogenomics. 2008 Jun;9(6):773-81. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.6.773.
6
Do we need a uniform regulatory system for biobanks across Europe?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;14(2):245-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201530.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验