• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者使用氯吡格雷的矛盾之处:来自糖尿病与急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究的见解

The paradox of clopidogrel use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: insight from the Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry.

作者信息

Ferlini Marco, Musumeci Giuseppe, Grieco Niccolò, Rossini Roberta, De Servi Stefano, Mafrici Antonio, Sponzilli Carlo, Demarchi Andrea, Assanelli Emilio M, Camisasca Paola, Chizzola Giuliano, Corrada Elena, Farina Andrea, Pedrinazzi Claudio, Lettieri Corrado, Oltrona Visconti Luigi

机构信息

SC Cardiologia Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia.

SC Cardiologia, Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Jun;29(4):309-315. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000601.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000000601
PMID:29309286
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute coronary syndromes have a greater level of platelet aggregation and a poor response to oral antiplatelet drugs. Clopidogrel is still widely used in clinical practice, despite the current evidence favoring ticagrelor and prasugrel.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of clopidogrel use in the population of the multicenter prospective 'Acute Coronary Syndrome and Diabetes Registry' carried out during a 9-week period between March and May 2015 at 29 Hospitals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 559 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients [mean age: 68.7±11.3 years, 50% ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)], with 'known DM' (56%) or 'hyperglycemia' at admission, were included in the registry; 460 (85%) patients received a myocardial revascularization.

RESULTS

At hospital discharge, dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed to 88% of the patients (clopidogrel ticagrelor and prasugrel to 39, 38, and 23%, respectively). Differences in P2Y12 inhibitor administration were recorded on the basis of history of diabetes, age, and clinical presentation (unstable angina/non-STEMI vs. non-STEMI). On univariate analysis, age older than 75 years or more, known DM, peripheral artery disease, previous myocardial infarction, previous revascularization, complete revascularization, previous cerebrovascular event, creatinine clearance, unstable angina/non-STEMI at presentation, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score, EuroSCORE, CRUSADE Bleeding Score, and oral anticoagulant therapy were significantly associated with clopidogrel choice at discharge. On multivariate analysis, only oral anticoagulant therapy and the CRUSADE Bleeding Score remained independent predictors of clopidogrel prescription.

CONCLUSION

In the present registry of a high-risk population, clopidogrel was the most used P2Y12 inhibitor at hospital discharge, confirming the 'paradox' to treat sicker patients with the less effective drug. Diabetic status, a marker of higher thrombotic risk, did not influence this choice; however, bleeding risk was taken into account.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)合并急性冠脉综合征的患者血小板聚集水平更高,对口服抗血小板药物反应较差。尽管目前有证据支持替格瑞洛和普拉格雷,但氯吡格雷仍在临床实践中广泛使用。

目的

本研究旨在调查在2015年3月至5月期间的9周内,于29家医院开展的多中心前瞻性“急性冠脉综合征与糖尿病登记研究”人群中使用氯吡格雷的决定因素。

患者与方法

共有559例连续性急性冠脉综合征患者[平均年龄:68.7±11.3岁,50%为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)]纳入登记研究,这些患者入院时患有“已知糖尿病”(56%)或“高血糖”;460例(85%)患者接受了心肌血运重建术。

结果

出院时,88%的患者接受了双联抗血小板治疗(分别有39%、38%和23%的患者接受氯吡格雷、替格瑞洛和普拉格雷治疗)。根据糖尿病病史、年龄和临床表现(不稳定型心绞痛/非STEMI与STEMI)记录了P2Y12抑制剂使用的差异。单因素分析显示,年龄大于75岁或更高、已知糖尿病、外周动脉疾病、既往心肌梗死、既往血运重建术、完全血运重建术、既往脑血管事件、肌酐清除率、入院时不稳定型心绞痛/非STEMI、急性冠脉事件全球登记评分、欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统评分、CRUSADE出血评分和口服抗凝治疗与出院时选择氯吡格雷显著相关。多因素分析显示,只有口服抗凝治疗和CRUSADE出血评分仍然是氯吡格雷处方的独立预测因素。

结论

在本次高危人群登记研究中,氯吡格雷是出院时最常用的P2Y12抑制剂,证实了用疗效较差的药物治疗病情较重患者这一“矛盾”现象。糖尿病状态作为血栓形成风险较高的一个指标,并未影响这一选择;然而,出血风险是被考虑在内的。

相似文献

1
The paradox of clopidogrel use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: insight from the Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者使用氯吡格雷的矛盾之处:来自糖尿病与急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究的见解
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Jun;29(4):309-315. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000601.
2
Management of diabetic patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes: a prospective multicenter registry.急性冠状动脉综合征住院糖尿病患者的管理:一项前瞻性多中心登记研究。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017 Aug;18(8):572-579. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000523.
3
Physician and Hospital Utilization of P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Research to Practice Initiative.美国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中P2Y12抑制剂的医生及医院使用情况:一项来自国家心血管数据注册中心“研究到实践”倡议的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006275. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
4
Temporal Trends in the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的时间趋势
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;23(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1074248417724869. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
5
Did Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Offer the Same Benefit in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Compared to Clopidogrel? Insights from Randomized Clinical Trials, Registries and Meta-analysis.普拉格雷和替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中提供相同获益吗?来自随机临床试验、登记和荟萃分析的见解。
Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(4):465-477. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180108121834.
6
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.
7
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
8
Ticagrelor and prasugrel are independent predictors of improved long-term survival in ACS patients.替格瑞洛和普拉格雷可独立预测 ACS 患者长期生存改善。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Nov;50(11):e13304. doi: 10.1111/eci.13304. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes in contemporary European registries: characteristics and outcomes.当代欧洲注册研究中急性冠脉综合征合并糖尿病患者的特征与结局。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2017 Oct 1;3(4):198-213. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw049.
10
Use of prasugrel vs clopidogrel and outcomes in patients with and without diabetes mellitus presenting with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征伴或不伴糖尿病患者中,使用普拉格雷与氯吡格雷的效果和结局比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 15;275:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.071. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Antithrombotic Therapy Strategies and Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Patients Aged 65 and Older with High Ischemic Risk Coronary Artery Disease.65岁及以上高缺血风险冠心病中国患者的抗栓治疗策略及临床结局
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Apr 2;20:415-424. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S491580. eCollection 2025.
2
A Comparison Between Culprit Versus Complete Revascularization in Diabetic Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者罪犯血管与完全血运重建的比较。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Nov;47(11):e70046. doi: 10.1002/clc.70046.
3
Ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in carrier of nonfunctional allele who has diabetes and acute coronary syndrome - case report and literature review.
替格瑞洛在患有糖尿病和急性冠状动脉综合征的无功能等位基因携带者中比氯吡格雷更有效——病例报告及文献综述
AIMS Mol Sci. 2022;9(2):66-78. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2022004. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
The Role of Clopidogrel in 2020: A Reappraisal.氯吡格雷在 2020 年的作用:再评价。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Mar 16;2020:8703627. doi: 10.1155/2020/8703627. eCollection 2020.
5
Factors associated with platelet reactivity during dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with diabetes after acute coronary syndrome.与急性冠脉综合征后糖尿病患者双联抗血小板治疗期间血小板反应性相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3175. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59663-3.
6
Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.年龄对接受双联抗血小板治疗的糖尿病患者血小板反应性的影响。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Oct;48(3):413-421. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01873-2.