• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5-羟色胺与去甲肾上腺素再摄取阻滞剂治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲比较。临床情况。

Double-blind comparison between a serotonin and a noradrenaline reuptake blocker in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Clinical aspects.

作者信息

Nyström C, Hällström T

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Jul;72(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02563.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02563.x
PMID:2930998
Abstract

Seventy-five outpatients with major depressive disorder (RDC) were randomly referred to treatment with a dominant serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibiting drug (zimeldine, 100 mg b.i.d.) or a dominant noradrenaline (NA) uptake inhibiting drug, (maprotiline, 75 mg b.i.d.). The total antidepressive effect was similar in the two groups for up to 4 weeks of treatment. Both drugs gave an effect on the depressive syndrome as a whole, with no preference for mood, anxiety, retardation or vital symptoms. Good response to the NA drug correlated to few prior episodes and few years since first episode, whereas the 5-HT drug had its best effect when there were several previous episodes.

摘要

75例符合研究诊断标准(RDC)的门诊重度抑郁症患者被随机分配接受主要抑制血清素(5-HT)摄取的药物(齐美利定,每日2次,每次100毫克)或主要抑制去甲肾上腺素(NA)摄取的药物(马普替林,每日2次,每次75毫克)治疗。在长达4周的治疗中,两组的总体抗抑郁效果相似。两种药物对整个抑郁综合征均有疗效,对情绪、焦虑、迟缓或生命体征无明显偏好。对NA药物反应良好与既往发作次数少及首次发作后年限短相关,而5-HT药物在既往发作次数较多时效果最佳。

相似文献

1
Double-blind comparison between a serotonin and a noradrenaline reuptake blocker in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Clinical aspects.5-羟色胺与去甲肾上腺素再摄取阻滞剂治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲比较。临床情况。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Jul;72(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02563.x.
2
Comparison between a serotonin and a noradrenaline reuptake blocker in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Biochemical aspects.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986 Feb;73(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb10578.x.
3
Comparison between a serotonin and a noradrenaline reuptake blocker in the treatment of depressed outpatients. A cross-over study.5-羟色胺与去甲肾上腺素再摄取阻滞剂治疗门诊抑郁症患者的比较:一项交叉研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987 Apr;75(4):377-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02805.x.
4
Zimelidine vs maprotiline in depressed outpatients. A preliminary report.门诊抑郁症患者中齐美利定与马普替林的对比:初步报告
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1981;290:225-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00724.x.
5
A double-blind comparative clinical trial of citalopram vs maprotiline in hospitalized depressed patients.西酞普兰与马普替林治疗住院抑郁症患者的双盲对照临床试验。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1987 Jul;2(3):239-53. doi: 10.1097/00004850-198707000-00006.
6
Clinical trials with new bicyclic and tetracyclic compounds: zimelidine and maprotiline [proceedings].新型双环和四环化合物的临床试验:齐美利定和马普替林[会议记录]
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1981 Jan;17(1):23-6.
7
Zimeldine versus nomifensine. A double-blind study of depressed inpatients.齐美利定与诺米芬辛对比:一项针对住院抑郁症患者的双盲研究。
Neuropsychobiology. 1984;11(4):236-42. doi: 10.1159/000118086.
8
A double-blind randomized study of clomipramine versus maprotiline in patients with idiopathic pain syndromes.氯米帕明与马普替林治疗特发性疼痛综合征患者的双盲随机研究。
Neuropsychobiology. 1988;19(1):25-34. doi: 10.1159/000118429.
9
Double-blind study of oxaprotiline versus clomipramine in the treatment of depressive inpatients.
Neuropsychobiology. 1987;17(1-2):41-8. doi: 10.1159/000118339.
10
Fluoxetine 40 mg vs maprotiline 75 mg in the treatment of out-patients with depressive disorders.氟西汀40毫克与马普替林75毫克治疗门诊抑郁症患者的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989 Jan;4 Suppl 1:47-50.