Reas Deborah Lynn, Rø Øyvind
Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Eat Behav. 2018 Jan;28:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
This study investigated subtype differences in eating disorder-specific impairment in a treatment-seeking sample of individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN).
The Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) were administered to 142 patients. Of these, 54.9% were classified as restricting type (AN-R) and 45.1% were classified as binge-eating/purging type (AN-B/P) based on an average weekly occurrence of binge eating and/or purging episodes (≥4 episodes/28days).
Individuals with AN-B/P exhibited higher levels of core ED psychopathology (dietary restraint, eating concern, shape/weight concerns) in addition to the expected higher frequency of binge/purge episodes. No significant differences existed between AN subtypes in the severity of ED-related impairment. Weight/shape concerns and binge eating frequency significantly predicted level of impairment. Differential associations were observed between the type of ED pathology that significantly contributed to impairment according to AN subtype.
Although those with AN-B/P displayed higher levels of core attitudinal and behavioral ED pathology than AN-R, no significant differences in ED-specific impairment were found between AN subtypes. Eating disorder-related impairment in AN was not related to the severity of underweight or purging behaviors, but was uniquely and positively associated with weight/shape concerns and binge eating frequency.
本研究调查了神经性厌食症(AN)寻求治疗样本中饮食失调特异性损害的亚型差异。
对142名患者进行了临床损害评估(CIA)和饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)。其中,根据平均每周暴饮暴食和/或清除发作的次数(≥4次发作/28天),54.9%被归类为限制型(AN-R),45.1%被归类为暴饮暴食/清除型(AN-B/P)。
除了预期的更高频率的暴饮暴食/清除发作外,AN-B/P个体还表现出更高水平的核心饮食失调精神病理学(饮食限制、饮食关注、体型/体重关注)。饮食失调相关损害的严重程度在AN亚型之间没有显著差异。体重/体型关注和暴饮暴食频率显著预测了损害水平。根据AN亚型,观察到对损害有显著贡献的饮食失调病理学类型之间存在差异关联。
尽管AN-B/P个体比AN-R个体表现出更高水平的核心态度和行为饮食失调病理学,但在AN亚型之间未发现饮食失调特异性损害的显著差异。AN中与饮食失调相关的损害与体重过轻或清除行为的严重程度无关,而是与体重/体型关注和暴饮暴食频率独特且正相关。