Suppr超能文献

抗生素检查表:一项观察性研究报告和实际执行检查表项目之间的差异。

The antibiotic checklist: an observational study of the discrepancy between reported and actually performed checklist items.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-132, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2878-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Checklists are increasingly used to measure quality of care. Recently we implemented an antibiotic checklist in nine Dutch hospitals and showed that use of the checklist resulted in more appropriate antibiotic use. While more appropriate antibiotic use was associated with a reduction in length of stay, use of the checklist in itself was not. In the current study we explored discrepancies between reported and actually performed checklist items at the patient level to test the validity of checklist answers, to evaluate whether discrepancies between reported and actually performed checklist items could explain the lack of effect of checklist use on length of stay, and to identify missed opportunities for performance per checklist item.

METHODS

Checklist answers represented reported performance. Actual performance was assessed by data from the patients' medical files. Reported and actually performed checklist items could be 'both YES'; 'both NO'; 'YES reported, NOT actually performed'; or 'NO reported, YES actually performed'. We determined an overall 'both YES' score per checklist, and used mixed models to evaluate whether an association existed between this overall score and patient's length of hospital stay. Finally, we analysed whether the items that were not actually performed, could have been performed.

RESULTS

Between January and October 2015 physicians filled in 1207 checklists. In total 7881 items were checked. Most items were 'both YES' (3392/7881, 43.0%) or 'both NO' (2601/7881, 33.0%). The number of 'YES reported, NOT actually performed' items was 1628/7881 (20.7%) compared to 260/7881 (3.3%) 'NO reported, YES actually performed' items. The level of discrepancy between reported and actually performed items differed per checklist item. The item 'prescribe antibiotic treatment according to the local guideline' had the highest percentage of 'YES reported, NOT actually performed' items, namely 45.1%. A higher overall 'both YES' score of the checklist was significantly associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. Of all checklist items 21.8% were not performed while they could have been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Checklist answers do not accurately assess actual provided care. As actual performance of the antibiotic checklist items is associated with length of stay, efforts to increase actual performance appear to be justified.

摘要

背景

清单越来越多地用于衡量医疗质量。最近,我们在荷兰的九家医院实施了抗生素清单,结果表明使用清单可以使抗生素的使用更加合理。尽管更合理的抗生素使用与住院时间的缩短有关,但清单的使用本身并没有。在当前的研究中,我们在患者层面上探索了报告和实际执行的清单项目之间的差异,以测试清单答案的有效性,评估报告和实际执行的清单项目之间的差异是否可以解释清单使用对住院时间的影响,以及确定每个清单项目遗漏的执行机会。

方法

清单答案代表报告的表现。实际表现通过患者病历中的数据进行评估。报告和实际执行的清单项目可以是“均为是”;“均为否”;“报告为是,实际未执行”;或“报告为否,实际执行了”。我们确定了每个清单的整体“均为是”得分,并使用混合模型来评估该总分与患者住院时间之间是否存在关联。最后,我们分析了实际未执行的项目是否可以执行。

结果

2015 年 1 月至 10 月期间,医生填写了 1207 份清单。共检查了 7881 项。大多数项目为“均为是”(3392/7881,43.0%)或“均为否”(2601/7881,33.0%)。“报告为是,实际未执行”的项目数量为 1628/7881(20.7%),而“报告为否,实际执行”的项目数量为 260/7881(3.3%)。报告和实际执行的项目之间的差异程度因清单项目而异。“根据当地指南开具抗生素治疗处方”这一项目的“报告为是,实际未执行”的项目比例最高,为 45.1%。清单的整体“均为是”得分越高,住院时间越短。在所有的清单项目中,有 21.8%的项目没有执行,但实际上是可以执行的。

结论

清单答案不能准确评估实际提供的护理。由于抗生素清单项目的实际执行与住院时间有关,因此努力提高实际执行率是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140e/5759243/891a65200e41/12879_2017_2878_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验