Shannon Clinic/Shannon Medical Center, San Angelo, Texas.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.10.027.
The implementation of policies to reduce environmental allergic triggers can be an important adjunct to optimal patient care for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. Policies at the local level in schools and other public as well as private buildings can make an impact on disease morbidity. Occupational exposures for allergens have not yet been met with the same rigorous policy standards applied for exposures to toxicants by Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Further benefit may be obtained through policies by local, county, state, and national governments, and possibly through international cooperative agreements. The reduction of allergenic exposures can and should be affected by policies with strong scientific, evidence-based derivation. However, a judicious application of the precautionary principle may be needed in circumstances where the health effect of inaction could lead to more serious threats to vulnerable populations with allergic disease. This commentary covers the scientific basis, current implementation, knowledge gaps, and pro/con views on policy issues in reducing environmental allergic triggers.
减少环境过敏原触发因素的政策的实施,可以成为变应性鼻炎和变应性哮喘患者最佳治疗的重要辅助手段。在学校和其他公共及私人建筑的地方层面实施的政策,可以对疾病发病率产生影响。职业暴露于过敏原的情况尚未达到职业安全与健康管理局为接触有毒物质制定的同样严格的政策标准。通过地方、县、州和国家政府的政策,可能通过国际合作协议,还可以获得进一步的好处。减少过敏原暴露的措施可以并应该通过具有强有力的科学依据的政策来实施。然而,在不采取行动可能会对患有过敏性疾病的弱势群体造成更严重威胁的情况下,谨慎应用预防原则可能是必要的。本评论涵盖了减少环境过敏原触发因素的政策的科学依据、当前实施情况、知识空白以及正反两方面的观点。