Aykutoğlu Bülent, Uysal Ahmet
Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 22;8:2257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02257. eCollection 2017.
In the current study we investigated the association between intimacy and passion by testing whether increases in intimacy generates passion (Baumeister and Bratslavsky, 1999). Furthermore, we examined whether there are partner effects in intimacy change and passion link. Couples ( = 75) participated in a 14-day long diary study. Dyadic multilevel analyses with residualized intimacy change scores showed that both actors' and partners' intimacy change positively predicted actor's passion. However, analyses also showed that residualized passion change scores positively predicted intimacy. Although these findings provide some empirical evidence for the intimacy change model, in line with the previous research (Rubin and Campbell, 2012), they also suggest that it is not possible to discern whether intimacy increment generates passion or passion increment generates intimacy.
在当前研究中，我们通过测试亲密感的增加是否会产生激情（鲍迈斯特和布拉茨拉夫斯基，1999年）来探究亲密感与激情之间的关联。此外，我们还考察了亲密感变化与激情联系中是否存在伴侣效应。75对情侣参与了一项为期14天的日记研究。对残差化的亲密感变化分数进行的二元多层分析表明，行动者自身以及伴侣的亲密感变化均能正向预测行动者的激情。然而，分析还表明，残差化的激情变化分数能正向预测亲密感。尽管这些发现为亲密感变化模型提供了一些实证证据，与先前的研究（鲁宾和坎贝尔，2012年）一致，但它们也表明，无法辨别是亲密感的增加产生了激情，还是激情的增加产生了亲密感。
