Ito Masaoki, Miyata Yoshihiro, Hirano Shoko, Kimura Shingo, Irisuna Fumiko, Ikeda Kyoko, Kushitani Kei, Tsutani Yasuhiro, Ueda Daisuke, Tsubokawa Norifumi, Takeshima Yukio, Okada Morihito
Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Analysis Center of Life Science, Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 14;8(65):108936-108945. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22426. eCollection 2017 Dec 12.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are classified as variants of endocrine carcinoma and subdivided into pure or combined type. Clinical benefit of target therapy has not been established in these tumors. This study aimed to compare genetic and clinicopathological features between SCLC and LCNEC or pure and combined types, and explore the possibility of target therapy using next-generation sequencing. In 13 SCLC and 22 LCNEC cases, 72 point mutations, 19 deletions, and 3 insertions were detected. As therapeutically targetable variants, mutations in (L858R), (G12D, G12A, G12V), and (E545K) were detected in 5 cases. The case harboring EGFR mutation showed response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, there are no clinicopathological features associated with therapeutically targetable cases. And there was no significant genetic feature between SCLC and LCNEC or pure and combined types. In conclusion, although patients with SCLC and LCNEC may benefit from target therapy, they were not identifiable by clinicopathologic background. And there was not significant genetic difference between SCLC and LCNEC, including between pure and combined types. Classifying SCLC and LCNEC in same category is reasonable. However, distinguishing the pure type from combined type was not validated. Comprehensive genetic analysis should be performed to detect targetable variants in any type of SCLC and LCNEC.
肺小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和肺大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)被归类为内分泌癌的变体,并细分为纯合型或混合型。在这些肿瘤中,靶向治疗的临床益处尚未得到证实。本研究旨在比较SCLC和LCNEC之间或纯合型与混合型之间的基因和临床病理特征,并利用二代测序探索靶向治疗的可能性。在13例SCLC和22例LCNEC病例中,检测到72个点突变、19个缺失和3个插入。作为可治疗的靶向变体,在5例病例中检测到(L858R)、(G12D、G12A、G12V)和(E545K)的突变。携带表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的病例对EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂有反应。然而,没有与可治疗靶向病例相关的临床病理特征。并且SCLC和LCNEC之间或纯合型与混合型之间没有显著的基因特征。总之,尽管SCLC和LCNEC患者可能从靶向治疗中获益,但无法通过临床病理背景来识别。并且SCLC和LCNEC之间没有显著的基因差异,包括纯合型与混合型之间。将SCLC和LCNEC归为同一类别是合理的。然而,区分纯合型和混合型尚未得到验证。应进行全面的基因分析,以检测任何类型的SCLC和LCNEC中的可靶向变体。