Faiena Izak, Kim Sinae, Farber Nicholas, Kwon Young Suk, Shinder Brian, Patel Neal, Salmasi Amirali H, Jang Thomas, Singer Eric A, Kim Wun-Jae, Kim Isaac Y
Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 28;8(65):109783-109790. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21297. eCollection 2017 Dec 12.
Previous studies have reported association of multiple preoperative factors predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with varying results. We assessed the predictive model using a combination of hormone profile, serum biomarkers, and patient characteristics in order to improve the accuracy of risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer. Data on 224 patients from our prostatectomy database were queried. Demographic characteristics, including age, body mass index (BMI), clinical stage, clinical Gleason score (GS) as well as serum biomarkers, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium (Ca), prostate acid phosphatase (PAP), testosterone, and chromogranin A (CgA), were used to build a predictive model of clinically significant prostate cancer using logistic regression methods. We assessed the utility and validity of prediction models using multiple 10-fold cross-validation. Bias-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (bAUC) over 200 runs was reported as the predictive performance of the models. On univariate analyses, covariates most predictive of clinically significant prostate cancer were clinical GS (OR 5.8, 95% CI 3.1-10.8; < 0.0001; bAUC = 0.635), total PSA (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.06-1.2; 0.0003; bAUC = 0.656), PAP (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1; 0.016; bAUC = 0.583), and BMI (OR 1.064, 95% C.I. 0.998, 1.134; < 0.056; bAUC = 0.575). On multivariate analyses, the most predictive model included the combination of preoperative PSA, prostate weight, clinical GS, BMI and PAP with bAUC 0.771 ([2.5, 97.5] percentiles = [0.76, 0.78]). Our model using preoperative PSA, clinical GS, BMI, PAP, and prostate weight may be a tool to identify individuals with adverse oncologic characteristics and classify patients according to their risk profiles.
以往的研究报告了多种术前因素与临床显著前列腺癌的关联,结果各异。我们使用激素谱、血清生物标志物和患者特征的组合来评估预测模型,以提高前列腺癌患者风险分层的准确性。查询了我们前列腺切除术数据库中224例患者的数据。使用人口统计学特征,包括年龄、体重指数(BMI)、临床分期、临床Gleason评分(GS)以及血清生物标志物,如前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、钙(Ca)、前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)、睾酮和嗜铬粒蛋白A(CgA),采用逻辑回归方法建立临床显著前列腺癌的预测模型。我们使用多次10折交叉验证评估预测模型的效用和有效性。报告了200次运行中校正偏倚的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(bAUC)作为模型的预测性能。在单变量分析中,对临床显著前列腺癌预测性最强的协变量是临床GS(OR 5.8,95%CI 3.1 - 10.8;<0.0001;bAUC = 0.635)、总PSA(OR 1.1,95%CI 1.06 - 1.2;0.0003;bAUC = 0.656)、PAP(OR 1.5,95%CI 1.1 - 2.1;0.016;bAUC = 0.583)和BMI(OR 1.064,95%CI 0.998,1.134;<0.056;bAUC = 0.575)。在多变量分析中,预测性最强的模型包括术前PSA、前列腺重量、临床GS、BMI和PAP的组合,bAUC为0.771([2.5, 97.5]百分位数 = [0.76, 0.78])。我们使用术前PSA、临床GS、BMI、PAP和前列腺重量的模型可能是一种识别具有不良肿瘤特征个体并根据其风险特征对患者进行分类的工具。