Audlin Jason R, Kurra Swamy, Lavelle William, Tallarico Richard A, Sun Mike H, Ordway Nathaniel R, Demers Lavelle Elizabeth A
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University.
Department of Anesthesiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University.
Cureus. 2017 Nov 3;9(11):e1818. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1818.
Introduction The use of intrathecal morphine has the potential to help alleviate the pain that patients experience undergoing spinal surgeries. Complications can cause immobilization, which can lead to vascular thrombosis and ileus. Studies have shown epidural analgesia significantly lowered postoperative pain scores in scoliosis surgeries. Intrathecal anesthesia has been shown to have good pain control over the initial 24-hour postoperative period. Purpose Determine if intrathecal morphine would reduce postoperative pain with minimal side effects. Methods The surgical case logs from three spinal deformity surgeons from a single academic medical center were reviewed retrospectively. This included cases where more than five levels of fusion occurred and surgery involved an osteotomy. The records of 17 patients were queried, and patient and surgical data were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: eight patients were administered intrathecal morphine and nine patients received no morphine. Postoperative pain scores were obtained hourly over the initial 24 hours postoperatively by nurses trained to obtain pain scores from the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. In addition, the rates of any noted side effects were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's exact tests were used to calculate any statistical significance with p < 0.05 considered to be significant. Results The maximum and total 24-hour postoperative pain scores had a mean of 5.6 (standard deviation = 4.2; p = 0.4266) and 69.3 (standard deviation = 57.8; p = 0.9189), respectively, for patients administered intrathecal morphine. The patients who did not receive intrathecal morphine had total pain scores of 3.9 (standard deviation = 4.5) and 65.7 (standard deviation = 79.7), respectively. Though the results were not statistically significant, there was a potential trend toward decreased in pain mean scores in the first 10 hours for the intrathecal morphine group. There was no statistical difference in the rate of side effects between patients. Conclusions The use of intrathecal morphine did not significantly appear to reduce postoperative pain in patients when compared to intravenous or oral narcotics. There was a potential trend in a reduction in postoperative pain during the first 10 hours postoperatively, but this did not reach a statistically significant value and did not hold up after the first 10 hours postoperatively. However, it was noted that intrathecal morphine was safe to use in postoperative spinal deformity surgery as no statistical significance in side effects was noted.
引言 鞘内注射吗啡有可能帮助减轻患者在脊柱手术过程中所经历的疼痛。并发症可能导致活动受限,进而引发血管血栓形成和肠梗阻。研究表明,硬膜外镇痛可显著降低脊柱侧弯手术患者的术后疼痛评分。鞘内麻醉已被证明在术后最初24小时内具有良好的疼痛控制效果。
目的 确定鞘内注射吗啡是否能以最小的副作用减轻术后疼痛。
方法 回顾性分析来自单一学术医疗中心的三位脊柱畸形外科医生的手术病例记录。这包括融合节段超过五个且手术涉及截骨术的病例。查询了17例患者的记录,并收集了患者和手术数据。患者被分为两组:八例患者接受鞘内注射吗啡,九例患者未接受吗啡。术后最初24小时内,由经过培训可使用数字疼痛评分量表获取疼痛评分的护士每小时记录一次术后疼痛评分。此外,记录任何观察到的副作用发生率。使用方差分析(ANOVA)和Fisher精确检验计算任何统计学显著性,p<0.05被认为具有显著性。
结果 接受鞘内注射吗啡的患者术后24小时最大疼痛评分和总疼痛评分的平均值分别为5.6(标准差=4.2;p=0.4266)和69.3(标准差=57.8;p=0.9189)。未接受鞘内注射吗啡的患者总疼痛评分分别为3.9(标准差=4.5)和65.7(标准差=79.7)。尽管结果无统计学显著性,但鞘内注射吗啡组在术后最初10小时疼痛平均评分有下降的潜在趋势。两组患者的副作用发生率无统计学差异。
结论 与静脉或口服麻醉剂相比,鞘内注射吗啡似乎并未显著减轻患者的术后疼痛。术后最初10小时内有术后疼痛减轻的潜在趋势,但未达到统计学显著性,且在术后10小时后未持续。然而,值得注意的是,鞘内注射吗啡在脊柱畸形术后手术中使用是安全的,因为未观察到副作用有统计学显著性。