Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kita, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ehime Rosai Hospital, 13-27, Minamikomatsubara, Niihama, Ehime, 792-8550, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3076-3086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-6019-6. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
Although there have been several reports of treating large post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcers by covering them with a polyglycolic acid sheet (PGAs), this approach presents problems regarding PGAs delivery. This study assessed the usefulness of a device delivery station system (DDSS) to evaluate the appropriate and rapid PGAs coating method with DDSS.
Thirty-nine of 41 patients who were diagnosed with early gastric cancer over 20 mm in diameter and pathologically diagnosed with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma were randomly allocated to the following two groups according to delivery method: the conventional PGAs delivery group (C group) (n = 19) and the new DDSS group (DDSS group) (n = 20). The primary outcome was the coating area per minute in the C group and DDSS group (cm/min).
There were significant differences in the coating time (min), with values of 34.1 (15.0-60.7) vs. 16.85 (11.5-27.2) min for the C group and DDSS group, respectively (p = 0.001). There was also a significant difference in coating area per minute, with values of 0.261 (0.02-1.00) and 0.96 (0.173-2.06) cm/min for the C group and DDSS group, respectively (p = 0.001). There were four cases of post-ESD bleeding (1-7 days after ESD) in the C group compared with 0 in the DDSS group, which represented a significant difference (p = 0.030).
The DDSS was very useful for rapidly delivering and tightly attaching a PGAs to control post-ESD bleeding.
University Hospital Medical Network (UMIN) 000026377.
虽然已有几篇关于使用聚乙二醇酸片(PGA)覆盖内镜黏膜下剥离(ESD)后大溃疡的报道,但这种方法在 PGA 递送方面存在问题。本研究评估了使用装置输送站系统(DDSS)的有效性,以评估使用 DDSS 进行适当且快速的 PGA 涂层方法。
将 41 例经内镜诊断为直径大于 20mm 的早期胃癌且病理诊断为高分化腺癌的患者随机分为两组,根据递送方法分为常规 PGA 递送组(C 组)(n=19)和新的 DDSS 组(DDSS 组)(n=20)。主要结局是 C 组和 DDSS 组的每分钟涂层面积(cm/min)。
C 组和 DDSS 组的涂层时间(min)差异有统计学意义,分别为 34.1(15.0-60.7)min 和 16.85(11.5-27.2)min(p=0.001)。每分钟涂层面积也有显著差异,分别为 0.261(0.02-1.00)cm/min 和 0.96(0.173-2.06)cm/min(p=0.001)。C 组有 4 例(ESD 后 1-7 天)出现 ESD 后出血,而 DDSS 组无出血,差异有统计学意义(p=0.030)。
DDSS 非常有助于快速输送和紧密贴合 PGA 以控制 ESD 后出血。
大学医院医疗网络(UMIN)000026377。