Suppr超能文献

心理治疗荟萃分析中的调节因素。

Moderators in psychotherapy meta-analysis.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Metropolitan State University , Saint Paul , MN , USA.

b Department of Counseling Psychology , University of Wisconsin , Madison , WI , USA.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2018 May;28(3):333-346. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1422214. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

Abstract

Psychotherapy meta-analyses sometimes generate heterogeneous results, partially due to key methodological characteristics which vary between studies (e.g., psychotherapy conditions are contrasted with structurally different control conditions). Examining these potential moderator variables can help explain heterogeneous results within and between psychotherapy meta-analyses. The present manuscript provides an overview of moderators that are highly relevant to test the generalizability of effects across psychotherapy trials. These moderators mainly fall into one of the following groups: (a) structural equivalence of interventions, (b) preferences/allegiances, (c) therapist effects, and (d) sample representativeness. Individual moderators include: Bona fide psychotherapy, proximity to psychological interventions, psychotherapy orientation, pre-training of therapists, supervision, caseload of therapists, dosage, homework, patient preferences, researcher and therapist allegiance, therapist effects in nested designs, aspects of sample representativeness, multiple outcomes, and time of assessment. Our analysis of 15 psychotherapy meta-analyses published in 2016 suggests that the structural equivalence of psychotherapeutic conditions, patient and therapist preferences/allegiances, therapist effects and nested data structures as well as sample representativeness were often neglected and little-discussed as potential moderators. The manuscript describes further conceptual and methodological challenges when conducting moderator analyses such as the categorization of psychological treatments and the importance of interrater coding. We encourage meta-analysts to consider moderators which have previously shown utility in explaining heterogeneous results in the psychotherapy literature. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: Relevant moderator variables help explain heterogeneous results in psychotherapy meta-analyses. Though these variables are often overlooked, they should be regularly incorporated in meta-analyses.

摘要

心理治疗荟萃分析有时会产生异质结果,部分原因是研究之间存在关键方法学特征的差异(例如,心理治疗条件与结构不同的对照条件相对比)。检查这些潜在的调节变量可以帮助解释心理治疗荟萃分析内和之间的异质结果。本文概述了对检验跨心理治疗试验效应可推广性高度相关的调节变量。这些调节变量主要分为以下几类:(a)干预措施的结构等同性,(b)偏好/忠诚,(c)治疗师效应,和(d)样本代表性。个体调节变量包括:真诚的心理治疗、接近心理干预、心理治疗取向、治疗师的预培训、监督、治疗师的工作量、剂量、家庭作业、患者偏好、研究人员和治疗师的忠诚、嵌套设计中的治疗师效应、样本代表性的各个方面、多个结果和评估时间。我们对 2016 年发表的 15 项心理治疗荟萃分析的分析表明,心理治疗条件的结构等同性、患者和治疗师的偏好/忠诚、治疗师效应和嵌套数据结构以及样本代表性通常被忽视且很少被讨论为潜在的调节因素。本文进一步描述了进行调节分析时的概念和方法学挑战,例如心理治疗的分类和评分员间一致性的重要性。我们鼓励荟萃分析人员考虑以前在解释心理治疗文献中的异质结果方面显示出有用性的调节因素。本文的临床或方法学意义:相关的调节变量有助于解释心理治疗荟萃分析中的异质结果。尽管这些变量经常被忽视,但它们应该定期纳入荟萃分析中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验