Department of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018 May;34(4):e2977. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2977. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
We aimed to determine the clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetes patients on basal insulin therapy with inadequate glucose control due to discordance between glycated haemoglobin (HbA ) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the real world.
This was a retrospective analysis of data from the ORBIT study in China. Clinical characteristics of patients with discordance between HbA and FPG at baseline and at the end of 6 months of follow-up were analysed using multinomial logistic regression in 4 study groups divided by HbA and FPG.
Overall, of 6721 patients initiated on basal insulin, 853 achieved HbA < 7% but FPG ≥ 7 mmol/L (group 2), while 997 had FPG < 7 mmol/L but HbA ≥ 7% (group 3) at the end of follow-up. Patients in group 3 had a longer duration of type 2 diabetes compared with those in group 2 (7.22 ± 5.30 vs 6.00 ± 4.80 y, P < .05). Patients on glargine (32.90%) or detemir (36.88%) treatment accounted for a higher proportion of patients with both HbA and FPG controlled than those on neutral protamine Hagedorn therapy (23.45%; P < .05). Per the multinomial logistic analysis, higher frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and use of glargine or detemir therapy were significantly inversely associated with risk of discordance between HbA and FPG, while dose of insulin was a risk factor for discordance at the end of follow-up (all P < .05).
Patients treated with insulin analogues (glargine or detemir), instead of neutral protamine Hagedorn, and with more frequent SMBG are more likely to exhibit concordance between HbA and FPG.
我们旨在确定由于糖化血红蛋白(HbA )和空腹血糖(FPG )之间的差异导致基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的临床特征。
这是一项对中国 ORBIT 研究数据的回顾性分析。根据 HbA 和 FPG 将患者分为 4 组,采用多项逻辑回归分析了基线和 6 个月随访结束时 HbA 和 FPG 之间存在差异的患者的临床特征。
总体而言,在开始接受基础胰岛素治疗的 6721 名患者中,853 名患者在随访结束时达到了 HbA <7%但 FPG≥7mmol/L(组 2 ),而 997 名患者 FPG<7mmol/L但 HbA≥7%(组 3 )。与组 2 相比,组 3 的 2 型糖尿病病程较长(7.22±5.30 比 6.00±4.80 年,P<0.05)。接受甘精胰岛素(32.90%)或地特胰岛素(36.88%)治疗的患者中,HbA 和 FPG 均控制的患者比例高于接受中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗的患者(23.45%;P<0.05)。根据多项逻辑分析,自我监测血糖(SMBG )的频率较高和使用甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素治疗与 HbA 和 FPG 之间存在差异的风险显著降低呈负相关,而胰岛素剂量是随访结束时存在差异的危险因素(均 P<0.05)。
接受胰岛素类似物(甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素)治疗而不是中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗且 SMBG 较频繁的患者更有可能表现出 HbA 和 FPG 之间的一致性。