Li Liuyang, Schallhorn Julie M, Ma Jiaonan, Cui Tong, Wang Yan
J Refract Surg. 2018 Jan 1;34(1):11-16. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20171115-01.
To assess the independent effect of energy setting on postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and further investigate an optimal energy setting for the 4.5-μm spot-track-distance, which is in wide clinical use.
A total of 1,130 eyes were included in a retrospective cohort study from Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Medical University from April 2015 to July 2016. Energy settings and baseline characteristics were recorded and 3-month UDVA was tested by a nurse blinded to the energy settings used. Multiple regression analysis and generalized estimating equations were used to take into account the correlation between the measurements from two eyes.
The 3-month UDVA (mean ± standard deviation) of 125 to 160 nJ (by 5-nJ increments) was 1.39 ± 0.19, 1.40 ± 0.32, 1.33 ± 0.27, 1.36 ± 0.27, 1.34 ± 0.25, 1.29 ± 0.19, 1.36 ± 0.27, and 1.19 ± 0.22, respectively. Energy was significantly associated with postoperative logMAR UDVA in different models and the regression coefficient (β) was robust (β = 0.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.00 to 0.01). The regression coefficient β (0.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.00 to 0.02, P = .0029) of energy (125 to 150 nJ, by 5-nJ increments) on 4.5-μm spot-track-distance was still associated with the logMAR UDVA when adjusted for sex, age, myopia, astigmatism, mean keratometry, central corneal thickness, preoperative logMAR CDVA, and side spot-track-distance.
The lower end of the energy studied was associated with a better postoperative UDVA in this population. The spot-track-distance of 4.5 μm with 125 nJ energy was the optimal combination within this range. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(1):11-16.].
评估小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)中能量设置对术后未矫正远视力(UDVA)的独立影响,并进一步研究临床上广泛使用的4.5μm光斑扫描距离的最佳能量设置。
对2015年4月至2016年7月天津医科大学天津眼科医院的1130只眼进行回顾性队列研究。记录能量设置和基线特征,由对所使用能量设置不知情的护士测量3个月时的UDVA。采用多元回归分析和广义估计方程来考虑双眼测量值之间的相关性。
能量设置为125至160 nJ(以5 nJ递增)时,3个月时的UDVA(平均值±标准差)分别为1.39±0.19、1.40±0.32、1.33±0.27、1.36±0.27、1.34±0.25、1.29±0.19、1.36±0.27和1.19±0.22。在不同模型中,能量与术后logMAR UDVA显著相关,回归系数(β)稳定(β = 0.01,95%置信区间 = 0.00至0.01)。在调整性别、年龄、近视、散光、平均角膜曲率、中央角膜厚度、术前logMAR CDVA和侧光斑扫描距离后,能量(125至150 nJ,以5 nJ递增)对4.5μm光斑扫描距离的回归系数β(0.01,95%置信区间 = 0.00至0.02,P = 0.0029)仍与logMAR UDVA相关。
在所研究的人群中,较低的能量设置与更好的术后UDVA相关。能量为125 nJ的4.5μm光斑扫描距离是该范围内的最佳组合。[《屈光手术杂志》。2018;34(1):11 - 16。]