Suppr超能文献

前哨淋巴结转移定量决定黑素瘤向非前哨淋巴结的播散和生存。

The sentinel lymph node spread determines quantitatively melanoma seeding to non-sentinel lymph nodes and survival.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Medical Biometry (Emeritus), University of Tübingen, Silcherstr. 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2018 Mar;91:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Complete lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node (SN) biopsy provides important prognostic information in melanoma patients but has been questioned for therapeutic use recently. We explored whether quantification of the tumour spread to SNs may replace histopathology of non-sentinel nodes (NSNs) for staging purposes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We quantified melanoma spread in SNs and NSNs in 128 patients undergoing CLND for a positive SN. In addition to routine histopathology, one-half of each of all 1496 SNs and NSNs was disaggregated into a single cell suspension and stained immunocytochemically to determine the number of melanoma cells per 10 lymph node cells, i.e. the disseminated cancer cell density (DCCD).

RESULTS

We uncovered melanoma spread to NSNs in the majority of patients; however, the tumour load and the proportion of positive nodes were significantly lower in NSNs than in SNs. The relation between SN and NSN spread could be described by a mathematical function with DCCD = DCCD/10 (c = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.76). At a median follow-up of 67 months, multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that DCCD (p = 0.02; HR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.71) and the total number of pathologically positive nodes (p = 0.02; HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.22) were significant risk factors after controlling for age, gender, thickness of melanoma and ulceration status. A prognostic model based on DCCD and melanoma thickness predicted outcome as accurately as a model including pathological information of both SNs and NSNs.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of DCCD renders CLND for staging purposes unnecessary.

摘要

简介

在阳性前哨淋巴结 (SN) 活检后进行完整的淋巴结清扫 (CLND) 可为黑色素瘤患者提供重要的预后信息,但最近其在治疗中的应用受到质疑。我们探讨了是否可以通过量化肿瘤扩散到 SN 来替代非前哨淋巴结 (NSN) 的组织病理学检查用于分期目的。

患者和方法

我们对 128 例因 SN 阳性而行 CLND 的患者的 SN 和 NSN 中的黑色素瘤扩散进行了定量。除了常规组织病理学检查外,所有 1496 个 SN 和 NSN 的一半被分散成单个细胞悬浮液,并进行免疫细胞化学染色,以确定每 10 个淋巴结细胞中的黑色素瘤细胞数量,即弥散性癌细胞密度 (DCCD)。

结果

我们发现黑色素瘤在大多数患者中扩散到 NSN,但与 SN 相比,NSN 的肿瘤负荷和阳性淋巴结比例明显较低。SN 和 NSN 扩散之间的关系可以用数学函数来描述,DCCD = DCCD/10 (c = 0.69;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.62-0.76)。在中位数为 67 个月的随访中,多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,DCCD (p = 0.02;HR 1.34,95% CI:1.05-1.71) 和病理上阳性淋巴结的总数 (p = 0.02;HR 1.53,95% CI:1.07-2.22) 是在控制年龄、性别、黑色素瘤厚度和溃疡状态后,是重要的风险因素。基于 DCCD 和黑色素瘤厚度的预后模型预测结果与包括 SN 和 NSN 病理信息的模型一样准确。

结论

DCCD 的评估使 CLND 用于分期目的变得不必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验