Suppr超能文献

对于高受控衰减参数(CAP)值,肝活检与瞬时弹性成像在脂肪变性分类上存在不一致。

Discordance in steatosis classification between liver biopsy and transient elastography for high controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values.

作者信息

Galaski Johanna, Schulz Lisa, Krause Jenny, Lohse Ansgar W

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;56(1):36-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123829. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured by transient elastography allows for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis. However, discrepant results between CAP values and histological evaluation have been reported in particular with high CAP values. We therefore investigated the diagnostic validity of high CAP measurements.

METHODS

Forty patients with liver disease and CAP measurements > 300 dB/m that underwent ultrasound-guided or minilaparoscopic liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled. CAP values were compared with the respective histological and macroscopic evaluation and correlated with clinical parameters.

RESULTS

CAP values > 300 dB/m had an 87.5 % specificity for detection of hepatic steatosis but failed to discriminate between steatosis grade S1 - S3. Discordant results, defined as a discrepancy of at least 2 steatosis grades between transient elastography and liver biopsy, were observed in 40 % of cases. The interquartile range (IQR) of CAP was confirmed as a predictor of discrepant findings. Macroscopic evaluation as part of minilaparoscopy detected hepatic steatosis in 74 % of patients with histological grade S2 - S3 in contrast to only 10 % classified as histological grade S0 - S1.

CONCLUSION

High CAP measurements need to be interpreted with care and with regard to clinical parameters, in particular when high IQR values are registered.

摘要

目的

通过瞬时弹性成像测量的受控衰减参数(CAP)可用于对肝脂肪变性进行无创评估。然而,尤其是在CAP值较高时,已报道CAP值与组织学评估结果存在差异。因此,我们研究了高CAP测量值的诊断有效性。

方法

回顾性纳入40例肝病患者,这些患者接受了超声引导或微型腹腔镜肝活检且CAP测量值> 300 dB/m。将CAP值与相应的组织学和宏观评估进行比较,并与临床参数相关联。

结果

CAP值> 300 dB/m对肝脂肪变性检测的特异性为87.5%,但无法区分脂肪变性S1 - S3级。在40%的病例中观察到不一致的结果,定义为瞬时弹性成像和肝活检之间至少有2个脂肪变性级别的差异。CAP的四分位数间距(IQR)被确认为不一致结果的预测指标。作为微型腹腔镜检查一部分的宏观评估在组织学分级为S2 - S3的患者中检测到74%的肝脂肪变性,相比之下,组织学分级为S0 - S1的患者中只有10%被检测到。

结论

高CAP测量值需要谨慎解读并结合临床参数,特别是当记录到高IQR值时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验