Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York.
Department of Surgery, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1241-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
Deep enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (DEA-ERCP) in post-bariatric Roux-en-Y (RY) anatomy is challenging. Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) and EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) are technically easier and faster but are more invasive and morbid procedures. Therefore, we have used DEA-ERCP as our first-line approach, reserving EDGE and LA-ERCP for cases in which adjunctive techniques that cannot be performed through an enteroscope are required (eg, EUS-FNA, sleeve sphincter of Oddi manometry), or DEA-ERCP failures. The 2 main methods for DEA-ERCP are balloon- and spirus-assisted. Current literature on spiral enteroscopy ERCP (SE-ERCP) in bariatric RY anatomy is scant with low success rates reported. Our center has nearly exclusively used SE-ERCP for bariatric patients. Here, we report one of the largest such series to date.
This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with bariatric-length RY anatomy who had SE-ERCP from December 2009 to October 2016 at a tertiary care center, by one operator (S.N.S.). Primary outcomes included success at reaching the papilla, cannulation success, success of desired therapeutic intervention, and overall SE-ERCP success.
Thirty-five SE-ERCPs were performed (28 in bariatric RY gastric bypass and 7 other long-limb RY surgical reconstructions). The papilla was reached in 86% (30/35) of cases. Cannulation success in patients in whom deep cannulation was indicated (28/30) was 100% (28/28 cases, including the 24 cases with native papilla). Therapeutic ERCP success was 100% (28/28). Overall SE-ERCP success was 86% (30/35). Median length of stay was 3 days. Median procedure time was 189 minutes. Reasons for SE-ERCP failures included RY anastomosis stricture, adhesions (2), long Roux limb, and redundant small bowel. Two of these patients underwent interventional radiology-guided percutaneous biliary drainage, 2 patients had laparoscopy-assisted ERCP, and 1 patient had EUS-guided antegrade cholangioscopy with sphincteroplasty and stone clearance. There were no adverse events.
With sufficient allotted time (median procedure time ∼3 hours) and high operator experience (a single-operator volume that exceeds that of other published series), SE-ERCP is safe and effective in bariatric, long-limb RY patients with an overall success rate of 86%, which is higher than previously reported.
在减肥后的 Roux-en-Y(RY)解剖结构中进行深度内镜辅助 ERCP(DEA-ERCP)具有挑战性。腹腔镜辅助 ERCP(LA-ERCP)和超声内镜引导经胃 ERCP(EDGE)在技术上更简单、更快,但更具侵入性和病态。因此,我们将 DEA-ERCP 作为我们的一线方法,仅在需要通过内镜无法进行的辅助技术(例如 EUS-FNA、Oddi 括约肌测压)或 DEA-ERCP 失败的情况下,使用 EDGE 和 LA-ERCP。DEA-ERCP 的两种主要方法是球囊和螺旋辅助。目前关于减肥 RY 解剖结构中螺旋内镜 ERCP(SE-ERCP)的文献很少,报道的成功率很低。我们中心几乎专门为减肥患者使用 SE-ERCP。在这里,我们报告了迄今为止最大的此类系列之一。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年 12 月至 2016 年 10 月在一家三级护理中心由同一位操作人员(S.N.S.)进行 SE-ERCP 的减肥 RY 解剖结构的连续患者。主要结局包括到达乳头、插管成功率、所需治疗干预的成功率和整体 SE-ERCP 成功率。
进行了 35 例 SE-ERCP(28 例在减肥 RY 胃旁路术和 7 例其他长肢 RY 重建术)。86%(30/35)的病例到达了乳头。在需要深部插管的患者中,插管成功率为 100%(28/30 例,包括 24 例原发性乳头)。治疗性 ERCP 成功率为 100%(28/28 例)。整体 SE-ERCP 成功率为 86%(30/35)。中位住院时间为 3 天。中位手术时间为 189 分钟。SE-ERCP 失败的原因包括 RY 吻合口狭窄、粘连(2 例)、Roux 肢过长和多余的小肠。其中 2 例患者行介入放射学引导经皮胆道引流,2 例患者行腹腔镜辅助 ERCP,1 例患者行超声内镜引导逆行胆胰管造影并行括约肌切开术和结石清除术。无不良事件发生。
在具有足够分配时间(中位手术时间约 3 小时)和高操作人员经验(单人操作量超过其他已发表系列)的情况下,SE-ERCP 在减肥、长肢 RY 患者中是安全有效的,总体成功率为 86%,高于之前的报道。