• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Conflicting asthma guidelines cause confusion in primary care.

作者信息

Keeley Duncan, Baxter Noel

机构信息

Primary Care Respiratory Society UK, Solihull, UK

Primary Care Respiratory Society UK, Solihull, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Jan 9;360:k29. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k29.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.k29
PMID:29317387
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Conflicting asthma guidelines cause confusion in primary care.相互矛盾的哮喘指南在基层医疗中引发了混乱。
BMJ. 2018 Jan 9;360:k29. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k29.
2
Evaluation and treatment of asthma: an overview.哮喘的评估与治疗：概述
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Nov;11(14 Suppl):S408-15; quiz S427-33.
3
Asthma in primary care.基层医疗中的哮喘
J Med Liban. 2001 Sep-Oct;49(5):284-7.
4
Are we overtreating recurrent wheezing in infancy?我们是否过度治疗婴儿期复发性喘息？
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):276-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
5
Effect of local standards on the implementation of national guidelines for asthma: primary care agreement with national asthma guidelines.地方标准对国家哮喘指南实施的影响：基层医疗与国家哮喘指南的一致性
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Oct;13(10):659-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00200.x.
6
Setting the gold standard: clinical and economic decision making in asthma management.确立金标准：哮喘管理中的临床与经济决策
Manag Care. 2003 Jan;12(1 Suppl):11-7.
7
Inhaled corticosteroids vs. leukotriene-receptor antagonists and asthma exacerbations in children.吸入性皮质类固醇与白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗儿童哮喘加重的疗效比较。
Respir Med. 2011 Jun;105(6):846-55. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.12.007. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
8
Self-reported physician practices for children with asthma: are national guidelines followed?针对哮喘儿童的自我报告的医生诊疗行为：是否遵循了国家指南？
Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4 Suppl):886-96.
9
Asthma in Italian conscripts: a four year study.意大利应征入伍者中的哮喘：一项为期四年的研究。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Apr;35(4):125-9.
10
[The control of asthma: a vital sign to be assessed on each consultation].[哮喘的控制：每次会诊时都需评估的一项生命体征]
Presse Med. 2005 Feb 26;34(4):267-8. doi: 10.1016/s0755-4982(05)83902-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Can we measure whether asthma guidelines lead to improved care?我们能否衡量哮喘指南是否能带来改善的护理？
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 Jun 27;34(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00379-6.
2
A simple and effective evidence-based approach to asthma management: ICS-formoterol reliever therapy.一种简单有效的基于证据的哮喘管理方法：吸入性糖皮质激素-福莫特罗缓解治疗。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jan 25;74(739):86-89. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X736353. Print 2024 Feb.
3
Author response.作者回复。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Oct 27;72(724):518-519. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X721013. Print 2022 Nov.
4
Diagnosis and management of asthma in children.儿童哮喘的诊断与管理。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Apr;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001277.
5
Mind the gap: Mapping variation between national and local clinical practice guidelines for acute paediatric asthma from the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.注意差距：从英国和荷兰的国家和地方急性儿科哮喘临床实践指南中映射出的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0267445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267445. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of asthma-exclusive nursing scheme on the treatment effect of asthma patients.哮喘专属护理方案对哮喘患者治疗效果的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):9048-9055. eCollection 2021.
7
Risks of poor asthma outcome in 14,405 children and young people in London.14405 名伦敦儿童和青少年哮喘不良预后的风险。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Jan 29;31(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-00215-7.
8
The use of a direct bronchial challenge test in primary care to diagnose asthma.在初级保健中使用直接支气管激发试验来诊断哮喘。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Oct 16;30(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-00202-y.
9
Protocol for the derivation and validation of a clinical prediction model to support the diagnosis of asthma in children and young people in primary care.支持基层医疗中儿童和青少年哮喘诊断的临床预测模型的推导与验证方案。
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Mar 24;5:50. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15751.1. eCollection 2020.
10
Personalized Medicine, Disruptive Innovation, and "Trailblazer" Guidelines: Case Study and Theorization of an Unsuccessful Change Effort.个性化医学、颠覆性创新和“开拓者”指南：不成功变革努力的案例研究和理论化。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):581-617. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12455. Epub 2020 May 20.