Suppr超能文献

健康志愿者中单剂、极低剂量利妥昔单抗:剂量和生物类似药检测的意义。

Single, very low rituximab doses in healthy volunteers - a pilot and a randomized trial: implications for dosing and biosimilarity testing.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

Department of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17934-6.

Abstract

There are no  dose-finding trials available for rituximab that could guide dosing in non-malignant diseases. We hypothesized that currently used doses (≥375 mg/m) exceed several hundred-fold the half-maximal effective dose, which is most sensitive for detecting putative differences between biosimilars and important for dose finding. In an open label, exploratory trial healthy volunteers received single infusions of rituximab at doses of 0.1, 0.3 or 1.0 mg/m. Subsequently, in a double-blind, randomized trial healthy volunteers received single infusions of two rituximab products at doses of 0.1 and 0.3 mg/m. In the exploratory trial rituximab transiently depleted CD20+ cells by a mean 68% (range: 57-95%), 74% (55-82%) and 97% (94-100%) immediately after the infusion of 0.1 (n = 4), 0.3 (n = 4) and 1 mg/m (n = 8), respectively. In the randomized trial CD20+ cells decreased by a mean 48% (25-84%) - 55% (26-85%) and 81 (67-89%) - 87% (77-96%) after infusion of 0.1 mg/m (n = 12) or 0.3 mg/m (n = 8 proposed biosimilar, n = 4 reference product) of the proposed biosimilar or the reference product, respectively. It is important to understand that in healthy volunteers <1% of the authorized rituximab doses depletes almost all circulating B lymphocytes. Thus, for non-malignant diseases alternative, more cost-effective dosing regimens seem plausible, but require clinical testing. (EudraCT-No. 2010-023781-45; EudraCT-No. 2013-001077-24).

摘要

目前尚无针对利妥昔单抗的剂量发现试验可用于指导非恶性疾病的剂量选择。我们假设目前使用的剂量(≥375mg/m)超过半数有效剂量数百倍,半数有效剂量对检测生物类似药之间的潜在差异最敏感,对剂量发现也很重要。在一项开放性、探索性试验中,健康志愿者单次输注利妥昔单抗的剂量分别为 0.1、0.3 或 1.0mg/m。随后,在一项双盲、随机试验中,健康志愿者单次输注两种利妥昔单抗产品的剂量分别为 0.1 和 0.3mg/m。在探索性试验中,利妥昔单抗分别在输注 0.1mg/m(n=4)、0.3mg/m(n=4)和 1mg/m(n=8)后即刻使 CD20+细胞平均减少 68%(范围:57-95%)、74%(55-82%)和 97%(94-100%)。在随机试验中,CD20+细胞分别减少 48%(25-84%)-55%(26-85%)和 81%(67-89%)-87%(77-96%),输注 0.1mg/m(n=12)或 0.3mg/m(n=8)拟生物类似药、n=4 参比产品后。重要的是要了解,在健康志愿者中,<1%的授权利妥昔单抗剂量几乎可耗尽所有循环 B 淋巴细胞。因此,对于非恶性疾病,替代的、更具成本效益的给药方案似乎是合理的,但需要进行临床测试。(EudraCT-No. 2010-023781-45;EudraCT-No. 2013-001077-24)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee46/5760686/1725e580de96/41598_2017_17934_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验