• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分指导哌拉西林/他唑巴坦输注模式在癌症医院获得性肺炎患者中的应用:一项随机对照研究

Selection of piperacillin/tazobactam infusion mode guided by SOFA score in cancer patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Lyu Yang, Yang Yang, Li Xin, Peng Min, He Xin, Zhang Peng, Dong Shangwen, Wang Wanhua, Wang Donghao

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer.

Department of Anesthesia, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Dec 21;14:31-37. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S145681. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S145681
PMID:29317824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5743125/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to select piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) infusion mode guided by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in cancer patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) postoperation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 120 cancer patients with postoperative HAP were divided into two groups: improved administration group (L group) and conventional treatment group (Con group). The Con group received traditional infusion of TZP and the L group received it as prolonged infusion. Blood drug concentration was detected at different time points. Based on the SOFA cut-off value of 9, the patients were regrouped into M (mild) and S (severe) groups.

RESULTS

Percent time that the free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) was longer than 5 h in L group, but <4 h in Con group. Administration method (=0.033, OX value 2.796, value 1.028, 95% CI: 0.855-8.934) and SOFA score (=0.038, OX value 0.080, value -2.522, 95% CI: 0.007-0.874) were independent predictors of patient survival. In the S group, compared to conventional treatment, prolonged infusion mode resulted in shorter days of antibiotic use and shorter ventilator time, and achieved longer survival, better clinical efficacy, and lower 28-day mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

For cancer patients with SOFA score ≥9, prolonged infusion of TZP could benefit the patients and obtain better clinical efficacy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在选择序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分指导下的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(TZP)输注模式用于癌症术后医院获得性肺炎(HAP)患者。

患者与方法

120例癌症术后HAP患者分为两组:改良给药组(L组)和传统治疗组(Con组)。Con组接受传统的TZP输注,L组接受延长输注。在不同时间点检测血药浓度。根据SOFA临界值9,将患者重新分为M(轻度)和S(重度)组。

结果

L组游离药物浓度高于最低抑菌浓度的时间百分比(%fT>MIC)大于5小时,而Con组小于4小时。给药方式(=0.033,OX值2.796, 值1.028,95%CI:0.855 - 8.934)和SOFA评分(=0.038,OX值0.080, 值 - 2.522,95%CI:0.007 - 0.874)是患者生存的独立预测因素。在S组中,与传统治疗相比,延长输注模式可缩短抗生素使用天数和呼吸机使用时间,并实现更长的生存期、更好的临床疗效和更低的28天死亡率。

结论

对于SOFA评分≥9的癌症患者,延长输注TZP可使患者获益并获得更好的临床疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/0a751d9c0634/tcrm-14-031Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/25766d368806/tcrm-14-031Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/2c23cfd0ab02/tcrm-14-031Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/e9dd524c90df/tcrm-14-031Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/13dd94143b0b/tcrm-14-031Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/0a751d9c0634/tcrm-14-031Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/25766d368806/tcrm-14-031Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/2c23cfd0ab02/tcrm-14-031Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/e9dd524c90df/tcrm-14-031Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/13dd94143b0b/tcrm-14-031Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/5743125/0a751d9c0634/tcrm-14-031Fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Selection of piperacillin/tazobactam infusion mode guided by SOFA score in cancer patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled study.基于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分指导哌拉西林/他唑巴坦输注模式在癌症医院获得性肺炎患者中的应用:一项随机对照研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Dec 21;14:31-37. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S145681. eCollection 2018.
2
[Treatment study of hospital acquired pneumonia by optimizing dosing regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam:prolonged vs. regular infusion].[通过优化哌拉西林/他唑巴坦给药方案治疗医院获得性肺炎:延长输注与常规输注]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Aug;25(8):479-83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.08.008.
3
Therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimisation of piperacillin/tazobactam to improve outcome in patients with sepsis (TARGET): a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial.基于治疗药物监测的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦剂量优化以改善脓毒症患者结局(TARGET):一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2019 Jun 6;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3437-x.
4
Clinical Efficacy of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床疗效比较
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Jun 16;14:2251-2258. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S313828. eCollection 2021.
5
Clinical Effect and Efficacy Factors of Modified Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosing Regimens in Abdominal Tumor Patients with Post-Operative Pneumonia.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦改良给药方案对腹部肿瘤术后肺炎患者的临床疗效及疗效影响因素
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Feb/Mar;18(2):99-104. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.087. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pilot study on efficacy and costs.呼吸机相关性肺炎中哌拉西林/他唑巴坦持续输注:疗效和成本的初步研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Feb;39(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
7
Clinical outcomes of extended versus intermittent administration of piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦延长给药与间歇给药治疗医院获得性肺炎的临床结局:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;36(3):459-466. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2819-1. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
8
Is prolonged infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in critically ill patients associated with improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and patient outcomes? An observation from the Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients (DALI) cohort.在重症患者中延长哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和美罗培南的输注时间是否与改善药代动力学/药效学及患者预后相关?来自重症监护病房患者抗生素水平界定(DALI)队列研究的一项观察结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jan;71(1):196-207. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv288. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
9
[Comparison of 3-hour and 30-minute infusion regimens for meropenem in patients with hospital acquired pneumonia in intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial].[重症监护病房医院获得性肺炎患者美罗培南3小时与30分钟输注方案的比较:一项随机对照临床试验]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Sep;26(9):644-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.09.008.
10
Comparative pharmacodynamics of intermittent and prolonged infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam using Monte Carlo simulations and steady-state pharmacokinetic data from hospitalized patients.应用蒙特卡罗模拟和来自住院患者的稳态药代动力学数据比较哌拉西林/他唑巴坦间歇性和持续输注的药效动力学。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Nov;43(11):1747-54. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M304. Epub 2009 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors Associated with Antibiotic Exposure Variability in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.危重症患者抗生素暴露变异性的相关危险因素:一项系统评价
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Aug 24;13(9):801. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090801.
2
Why We May Need Higher Doses of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: Introducing the 'Maximum Tolerable Dose'.为何我们可能需要更高剂量的β-内酰胺类抗生素:引入“最大耐受剂量”
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jul 4;11(7):889. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070889.
3
Optimal infusion rate in antimicrobial therapy explosion of evidence in the last five years.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Antibiotic Prescription Associated With Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in China.中国上呼吸道感染相关抗生素处方的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(19):e3587. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003587.
2
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Correlation of Cefquinome Against Experimental Catheter-Associated Biofilm Infection Due to Staphylococcus aureus.头孢喹肟对金黄色葡萄球菌所致实验性导管相关生物膜感染的药代动力学/药效学相关性
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jan 7;6:1513. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01513. eCollection 2015.
3
Continuous versus intermittent piperacillin/tazobactam infusion in infection due to or suspected pseudomonas aeruginosa.
抗菌治疗中的最佳输注速率:过去五年证据激增。
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Aug 8;11:1105-1117. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S167616. eCollection 2018.
在铜绿假单胞菌感染或疑似感染中持续输注与间歇输注哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的比较
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):70-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0208-y.
4
Is prolonged infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in critically ill patients associated with improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and patient outcomes? An observation from the Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients (DALI) cohort.在重症患者中延长哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和美罗培南的输注时间是否与改善药代动力学/药效学及患者预后相关?来自重症监护病房患者抗生素水平界定(DALI)队列研究的一项观察结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jan;71(1):196-207. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv288. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
5
Pharmacokinetics of short versus extended infusion meropenem dosing in critically ill patients: a pilot study.重症患者中短时间输注与延长时间输注美罗培南给药的药代动力学:一项初步研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2014 Sep;16(3):190-6.
6
[Treatment study of hospital acquired pneumonia by optimizing dosing regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam:prolonged vs. regular infusion].[通过优化哌拉西林/他唑巴坦给药方案治疗医院获得性肺炎:延长输注与常规输注]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Aug;25(8):479-83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.08.008.
7
Outcomes of extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam: a retrospective analysis of critically ill patients.延长输注哌拉西林他唑巴坦的结局:危重症患者的回顾性分析。
Clin Ther. 2012 Dec;34(12):2297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Comparison of 30-min and 3-h infusion regimens for imipenem/cilastatin and for meropenem evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation.蒙特卡洛模拟评估亚胺培南/西司他丁和美罗培南的 30 分钟和 3 小时输注方案。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Nov;68(3):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
9
Accuracy of American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria in predicting infection or colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria at intensive-care unit admission.美国胸科学会/传染病学会标准在预测 ICU 入院时多重耐药菌感染或定植的准确性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jul;16(7):902-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03027.x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
10
Piperacillin-tazobactam for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: clinical implications of an extended-infusion dosing strategy.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染:延长输注给药策略的临床意义
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 1;44(3):357-63. doi: 10.1086/510590. Epub 2007 Jan 2.