• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较三种预测胃肠道间质瘤患者癌症特异性生存的预后模型。

Comparison of three prognostic models for predicting cancer-specific survival among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

机构信息

Oncology Department, Swiss Cancer Institute, Cham, Switzerland.

Department of General, Visceral & Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(4):379-389. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0450. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

DOI:10.2217/fon-2017-0450
PMID:29318911
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the predictive value for cancer-specific survival of the models of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, NIH and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2014) was accessed. Overall survival analysis and adjusted cancer-specific Cox regression hazard was calculated.

RESULTS

For gastric GISTs, concordance-index according to AJCC was 0.834; according to NIH was 0.833; according to AFIP was 0.836. Concordance-index for nongastric GISTs according to AJCC was 0.800, according to NIH was 0.801 and according to AFIP was 0.799.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the three models is comparable with regards to cancer-specific survival prediction.

摘要

目的

评估美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期、NIH 和武装部队病理研究所(AFIP)模型对胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者癌症特异性生存的预测价值。

方法

检索监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2010-2014 年)。进行总生存分析和调整后的癌症特异性 Cox 回归风险计算。

结果

对于胃 GIST,根据 AJCC 的一致性指数为 0.834;根据 NIH 的一致性指数为 0.833;根据 AFIP 的一致性指数为 0.836。根据 AJCC 的非胃 GIST 的一致性指数为 0.800,根据 NIH 的一致性指数为 0.801,根据 AFIP 的一致性指数为 0.799。

结论

在预测癌症特异性生存方面,这三个模型的性能相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three prognostic models for predicting cancer-specific survival among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.比较三种预测胃肠道间质瘤患者癌症特异性生存的预后模型。
Future Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(4):379-389. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0450. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
The assessment of different risk classification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): the analytic results from the SEER database.胃肠道间质瘤(GISTs)不同风险分类系统的评估:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的分析结果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1319-1327. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1515319. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
Clinical utility of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current overall survival after primary tumor resection.新的美国癌症联合委员会胃肠间质瘤分期系统的临床实用性:原发性肿瘤切除后的当前总体生存率。
Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;117(21):4916-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26079. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
4
Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study.胃肠道间质瘤风险分层系统的性能:一项多中心研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 14;25(10):1238-1247. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238.
5
Which is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary GIST? Comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified Armed Forces Institute of Pathology risk criteria.对于接受手术治疗的局限性原发性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST),哪种风险分层系统是最佳的?171例肿瘤中三种当代预后标准的比较及改良的武装部队病理研究所风险标准的建议。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Aug;15(8):2153-63. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9969-z. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
6
A new nomogram for recurrence-free survival prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Comparison with current risk classification methods.一种用于预测胃肠道间质瘤无复发生存的新诺莫图:与当前风险分类方法的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):1109-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Two staging systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach: which is better?两种用于胃胃肠道间质瘤的分期系统:哪种更好?
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0705-7.
8
Risk stratification systems for surgically treated localized primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST). Review of literature and comparison of the three prognostic criteria: MSKCC Nomogramm, NIH-Fletcher and AFIP-Miettinen.手术治疗局限性原发性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的风险分层系统。文献综述及三种预后标准的比较:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)列线图、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)-弗莱彻标准和武装部队病理研究所(AFIP)-米耶蒂宁标准。
Ann Ital Chir. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):219-27.
9
Prognostic value of fibrinogen and D-dimer-fibrinogen ratio in resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors.纤维蛋白原和 D-二聚体-纤维蛋白原比值对可切除胃肠道间质瘤的预后价值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 28;24(44):5046-5056. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i44.5046.
10
Conditional disease-free survival after surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of 502 patients.胃肠道间质瘤手术切除后的无病生存情况:502例患者的多机构分析
JAMA Surg. 2015 Apr;150(4):299-306. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2881.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative study of National Institute of Health criteria and TNM staging system in predicting the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a retrospective study.美国国立卫生研究院标准与TNM分期系统在预测胃肠道间质瘤预后中的比较研究:一项回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 19;15:1622777. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1622777. eCollection 2025.
2
Significant adverse prognostic events in patients with urosepsis: a machine learning based model development and validation study.尿脓毒症患者的重大不良预后事件:一项基于机器学习的模型开发与验证研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Aug 8;15:1623109. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1623109. eCollection 2025.
3
Development and validation of a predictive model for continuous renal replacement therapy in sepsis patients using the MIMIC-IV database.
使用MIMIC-IV数据库开发和验证脓毒症患者持续肾脏替代治疗的预测模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07647-6.
4
Machine Learning for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.用于预测冠心病重症患者急性肾损伤的机器学习:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 28;13:e72349. doi: 10.2196/72349.
5
StrokeClassifier: ischemic stroke etiology classification by ensemble consensus modeling using electronic health records.中风分类器:通过使用电子健康记录的集成共识模型进行缺血性中风病因分类。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 17;7(1):130. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01120-w.
6
Ischemic Stroke Etiology Classification by Ensemble Consensus Modeling Using Electronic Health Records.基于电子健康记录的集成共识模型对缺血性中风病因进行分类
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 31:rs.3.rs-3367169. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3367169/v1.
7
Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, molecular-genetic and risk profiles of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a cohort of Sudanese patients.苏丹患者队列中胃肠道间质瘤的临床病理、免疫组织化学、分子遗传学和风险特征。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Mar;23(1):444-458. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.47.
8
Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: interpretable machine learning approach.建立和验证脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤危重症患者的预后模型:可解释的机器学习方法。
J Transl Med. 2023 Jun 22;21(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04205-4.
9
Predicting the Prognosis of Patients in the Coronary Care Unit: A Novel Multi-Category Machine Learning Model Using XGBoost.预测冠心病监护病房患者的预后:一种使用XGBoost的新型多类别机器学习模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 12;9:764629. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.764629. eCollection 2022.
10
Monitoring Circulating Tumor DNA During Surgical Treatment in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.监测胃肠道间质瘤患者手术治疗期间的循环肿瘤 DNA。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2021 Dec;20(12):2568-2576. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0403. Epub 2021 Sep 22.