• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.阴茎癌淋巴结状态预测指标的验证:基于人群队列的结果
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Apr;12(4):119-125. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4711. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
2
Clear-cell differentiation and lymphatic invasion, but not the revised TNM classification, predict lymph node metastases in pT1 penile cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 76 patients from a low incidence area.透明细胞分化和淋巴管浸润,但不是修订后的 TNM 分类,可预测低发地区 76 例 pT1 阴茎癌中的淋巴结转移:一项临床病理研究。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
3
Histopathological risk scoring system as a tool for predicting lymph nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma.组织病理学风险评分系统作为预测阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结转移的工具。
Pathology. 2019 Dec;51(7):696-704. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
The role of inguinal lymph node dissection in men with urethral squamous cell carcinoma.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在男性尿道鳞状细胞癌中的作用。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;36(12):526.e1-526.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Predictors of Nodal Upstaging in Clinical Node Negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.阴茎癌临床淋巴结阴性患者淋巴结分期上调的预测因素:一项国家癌症数据库分析
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Development and external validation of a prognostic tool for prediction of cancer-specific mortality after complete loco-regional pathological staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.阴茎鳞状细胞癌完全局部区域病理分期后癌症特异性死亡率预测预后工具的开发与外部验证
BJU Int. 2015 Nov;116(5):734-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.12677. Epub 2015 May 13.
7
More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer.更多的淋巴结清扫术可改善新诊断为淋巴结阳性的阴茎癌患者的生存。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Apr;51(4):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02084-7. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.用于指导早期乳腺癌女性辅助化疗决策的基因表达谱分析:基于证据的经济分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(23):1-57. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
9
Factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection for penile squamous cell carcinoma.阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结清扫术后区域复发的相关因素。
BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):591-597. doi: 10.1111/bju.13686. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Factors related to lymph node sampling at the time of surgery in children, adolescents, and young adults with unilateral non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.儿童、青少年和青年单侧非转移性肾细胞癌患者手术时淋巴结采样的相关因素。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 May;15(3):259.e1-259.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors predictive of recurrence, metastasis and death in node-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicentre cohort study.阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结阴性患者复发、转移及死亡的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Mar;39(3):576-585. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20093. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Evaluation of Prognostic Parameters to Identify Aggressive Penile Carcinomas.评估用于识别侵袭性阴茎癌的预后参数
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;15(19):4748. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194748.
3
A Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Penile Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.用于预测阴茎癌淋巴结转移的临床列线图:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 9;11:640036. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.640036. eCollection 2021.
4
Prognostic predictors of lymph node metastasis in penile cancer: a systematic review.阴茎癌淋巴结转移的预后预测因子:系统评价。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Sep-Oct;47(5):943-956. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0959.
5
Predictors of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile cancer patients: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies.阴茎癌患者腹股沟淋巴结转移的预测因素:一项回顾性研究的荟萃分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 10;11:6425-6441. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S206579. eCollection 2019.
6
Predictors of lymph node status in penile cancer: High-quality administrative datasets give us insight into what's happening in our own backyard.阴茎癌淋巴结状态的预测因素:高质量管理数据集让我们深入了解自家后院正在发生的情况。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Apr;12(4):126. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5278. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The Patterns of Practice and Outcomes of Penile Cancer in Ontario.安大略省阴茎癌的治疗模式与治疗结果
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Apr;29(4):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Evaluating Discrimination of Risk Prediction Models: The C Statistic.评估风险预测模型的判别力:C统计量
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1063-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11082.
3
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update.EAU 指南:阴茎癌 2014 年更新版
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
5
Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌:手术技术、早期并发症和晚期结果。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: initial experiences at a Swedish referral centre.阴茎癌的动态前哨淋巴结活检:瑞典转诊中心的初步经验。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3 Pt B):E48-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11437.x. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
7
Prognostic factors in penile cancer.阴茎癌的预后因素。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.008.
8
Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.阴茎癌的淋巴结管理。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.001.
9
Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.改良根治性腹股沟淋巴结切除术治疗阴茎癌:发病率和结果。
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.140. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
10
Development and evaluation of a nomogram to predict inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes.制定并评估列线图预测阴茎癌临床淋巴结阴性患者腹股沟淋巴结转移的风险。
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.145. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

阴茎癌淋巴结状态预测指标的验证:基于人群队列的结果

Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.

作者信息

Qu X Melody, Siemens D Robert, Louie Alexander V, Yip Darwin, Mahmud Aamer

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON.

Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Apr;12(4):119-125. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4711. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.4711
PMID:29319487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5905539/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The ability to predict lymph node (LN) status is essential in the management of men with localized squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis. There has been limited external validation of available risk stratification tools, particularly in routine clinical care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive variables of LN metastases within a large population-based cohort of patients.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study, surgical pathology reports were linked to the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry to identify all patients who were diagnosed with penile cancer in Ontario, Canada. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate predictive variables for LN involvement. Three contemporary risk stratification schemes used to predict LN status were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 380 localized penile SCC cases treated between 2000 and 2010. Sixty-three (17%) had pathologically confirmed LN metastases. Among these, 35 (56%) were diagnosed within three months of the initial penile SCC diagnosis and these patients had a worse five-year disease-specific survival (43%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26-64) compared to patients who were diagnosed at a delayed LN dissection. On multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.88), pathological stage (≥pT1b; OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.38-8.01), and tumour grade (Grade 2 OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.26-7.62; Grade 3 OR 3.97; 95% CI 1.32-11.9) were associated with an increased risk of LN metastases. Candidate risk stratification schemes demonstrated moderate to good property, with C-statistics ranging from 0.662-0.747.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a population-based cohort of penile cancer patients with a relatively low proportion of patients with pathologically confirmed LN involvement, we confirm and externally validate the importance of age, stage, and grade of the primary tumour in predicting nodal status.

摘要

引言

预测淋巴结(LN)状态的能力对于阴茎局限性鳞状细胞癌(SCC)男性患者的管理至关重要。现有的风险分层工具的外部验证有限,尤其是在常规临床护理中。本研究的目的是评估一大群基于人群的患者队列中LN转移的预测变量。

方法

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,手术病理报告与基于人群的安大略癌症登记处相关联,以识别加拿大安大略省所有被诊断为阴茎癌的患者。进行多变量分析以评估LN受累的预测变量。通过逻辑回归分析用于预测LN状态的三种当代风险分层方案。

结果

该研究包括2000年至2010年间治疗的380例局限性阴茎SCC病例。六十三例(17%)有病理证实的LN转移。其中,35例(56%)在初次阴茎SCC诊断后的三个月内被诊断出来,与在延迟LN清扫时被诊断的患者相比,这些患者的五年疾病特异性生存率较差(43%;95%置信区间[CI]26 - 64)。在多变量分析中,年龄(比值比[OR]0.68;95%CI 0.52 - 0.88)、病理分期(≥pT1b;OR 3.32;95%CI 1.38 - 8.01)和肿瘤分级(2级OR 2.98;95%CI 1.26 - 7.62;3级OR 3.97;95%CI 1.32 - 11.9)与LN转移风险增加相关。候选风险分层方案显示出中等至良好的性能,C统计量范围为0.662 - 0.747。

结论

在病理证实LN受累患者比例相对较低的基于人群的阴茎癌患者队列中,我们证实并在外部验证了原发性肿瘤的年龄、分期和分级在预测淋巴结状态方面的重要性。