• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lung Cancer Screening Uncertainty among Patients Undergoing LDCT.接受低剂量CT扫描的患者中肺癌筛查的不确定性
Am J Health Behav. 2018 Jan 1;42(1):69-76. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.1.7.
2
Barriers to Completing Low Dose Computed Tomography Scan for Lung Cancer Screening.完成低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的障碍。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2024 Jul;25(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
3
Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.学术医疗中心基层医疗服务提供者的低剂量CT肺癌筛查实践与态度
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):664-70. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care.一项在初级保健中测试肺癌筛查决策辅助工具的前后研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1.
5
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.初级保健提供者和患者对肺癌筛查的看法。定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1977-1982. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC.
6
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.
7
Factors influencing lung cancer screening completion following participation in shared decision-making: A retrospective study in a U.S. academic health system.影响参与共享决策后肺癌筛查完成率的因素:美国学术医疗系统中的回顾性研究。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020;24:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100198. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.低剂量计算机断层扫描在高危人群中的肺癌筛查:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(69):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta22690.
9
Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis.了解是否进行肺癌筛查的决策:一项定性分析。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1314-1321. doi: 10.1111/hex.12975. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening. The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making.患者如何看待肺癌筛查。医学决策不确定性的作用。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1969-1976. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-290OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive performance of risk prediction models for lung cancer incidence in Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西方国家和亚洲国家肺癌发病风险预测模型的预测性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):4259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83875-6.
2
Lung cancer screening among minority groups: Identifying gaps in screening and opportunities for intervention.少数群体中的肺癌筛查:识别筛查差距与干预机会。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Jul 10;21:341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.07.001. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Participant factors associated with psychosocial impacts of lung cancer screening: A systematic review.与肺癌筛查的心理社会影响相关的参与者因素:系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(15):e70054. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70054.
4
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.肺癌筛查实施的促进因素和障碍:基于框架的系统综述。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Nov 14;114(11):1449-1467. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac154.
5
The impact of income and education on lung cancer screening utilization, eligibility, and outcomes: a narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening.收入和教育对肺癌筛查利用、资格及结果的影响:肺癌筛查中社会经济差异的叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jun;13(6):3745-3757. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3281.
6
Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety.扫描焦虑症:与扫描相关的焦虑症的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 26;11(5):e043215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043215.
7
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.美国肺癌筛查中的种族和社会经济差异:系统评价。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):299-314. doi: 10.3322/caac.21671. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Perceived cancer-related benefits of quitting smoking and associations with quit intentions among recently diagnosed cancer patients.最近被诊断患有癌症的患者对戒烟相关益处的认知与戒烟意愿的关联。
J Health Psychol. 2021 May;26(6):831-842. doi: 10.1177/1359105319845131. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.美国的低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——2010 年至 2015 年。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1278-1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416.
2
How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening. The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making.患者如何看待肺癌筛查。医学决策不确定性的作用。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1969-1976. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-290OC.
3
Society of Behavioral Medicine supports implementation of high quality lung cancer screening in high-risk populations.行为医学协会支持在高危人群中开展高质量的肺癌筛查。
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):669-671. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0440-6.
4
Implementation planning for lung cancer screening: five major challenges.肺癌筛查的实施规划:五大挑战
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Sep;4(9):685-687. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30233-8.
5
Fear of cancer recurrence: a theoretical review and its relevance for clinical presentation and management.对癌症复发的恐惧:一项理论综述及其对临床表现和管理的相关性
Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1444-1454. doi: 10.1002/pon.4168. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.压力对不确定性下决策的影响:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):909-933. doi: 10.1037/bul0000060.
7
Risk factors assessment and risk prediction models in lung cancer screening candidates.肺癌筛查人群的风险因素评估和风险预测模型。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Apr;4(8):151. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.04.03.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.使用低剂量计算机断层扫描的肺癌筛查策略的成本效益分析:一项系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0226-5.
9
An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice.美国胸科学会/美国胸科医师学会官方政策声明:在临床实践中实施低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查项目
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 1;192(7):881-91. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1671ST.
10
Comorbidities, smoking status, and life expectancy among individuals eligible for lung cancer screening.符合肺癌筛查条件的个体的合并症、吸烟状况和预期寿命。
Cancer. 2015 Dec 15;121(24):4341-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29677. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

接受低剂量CT扫描的患者中肺癌筛查的不确定性

Lung Cancer Screening Uncertainty among Patients Undergoing LDCT.

作者信息

Hall Daniel L, Lennes Inga T, Carr Alaina, Eusebio Justin R, Yeh Gloria Y, Park Elyse R

机构信息

Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, USA.

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MAMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Behav. 2018 Jan 1;42(1):69-76. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.1.7.

DOI:10.5993/AJHB.42.1.7
PMID:29320340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5777324/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, yet lung screening remains underutilized. Lung cancer screening uncertainty (LCSU), including referral clarity and the perceived accuracy of screening, may hinder utilization and represent an unmet psychosocial need. This study sought to identify correlates of LCSU among lung screening patients.

METHODS

Current and former smokers (N = 169) completed questionnaires assessing LCSU, sociodemographic variables, objective and subjective numeracy, stress, and anxiety, as part of a cross-sectional study of lung screening patients at an academic hospital.

RESULTS

Patients (52% current smok- ers) reported high clarity about the reason for their lung screening referral. Less clarity was as- sociated with lower education, not receiving Medicare, and greater stress and anxiety. Patients perceived lung screening to be moderately accurate, and levels were inversely related to objective numeracy. Subjective numeracy was higher among former versus current smokers (OR = 2.5), yet was unrelated to LCSU variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Several sociodemographic, numeracy, and emotional factors were associated with greater LCSU. With multiple policy and clinical guidelines purporting the uptake of annual lung screening, it is important to identify patients with LCSU and tailor shared decision-making to clarify their uncertainties.

摘要

目的

肺癌是癌症死亡的主要原因,但肺癌筛查的利用率仍然较低。肺癌筛查不确定性(LCSU),包括转诊清晰度和对筛查准确性的认知,可能会阻碍其利用率,并代表一种未得到满足的社会心理需求。本研究旨在确定肺癌筛查患者中LCSU的相关因素。

方法

作为对一家学术医院肺癌筛查患者的横断面研究的一部分,现吸烟者和既往吸烟者(N = 169)完成了评估LCSU、社会人口统计学变量、客观和主观数字能力、压力和焦虑的问卷。

结果

患者(52%为现吸烟者)报告称对其肺癌筛查转诊原因的清晰度较高。清晰度较低与较低的教育程度、未参加医疗保险以及更大的压力和焦虑有关。患者认为肺癌筛查的准确性中等,且水平与客观数字能力呈负相关。既往吸烟者的主观数字能力高于现吸烟者(OR = 2.5),但与LCSU变量无关。

结论

几个社会人口统计学、数字能力和情绪因素与更高的LCSU相关。由于多项政策和临床指南都主张进行年度肺癌筛查,识别有LCSU的患者并调整共同决策以澄清他们的不确定性很重要。