Suppr超能文献

[热线风速仪的可靠性如何?]

[How reliable is a hot-wire anemometer?].

作者信息

von Rechenberg H, Konder H, Höser K, Lennartz H

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1985 Aug;34(8):409-14.

PMID:2932035
Abstract

To examine the advantage of hot-wire anemometer for clinical use, we have checked two types of this tools with respect to reliability and validity. It was found that electronic suppression of noise caused a distortion of the measurements. Furthermore changes of transducers were also responsible for deviations from true values. We require of the manufacturer to indicate the threshold of perception and the coefficient of variation for repeated measurements with several transducers. We recommend a simple rule which permits an estimation of the limits of reliable measurements for clinical use depending on the threshold of the equipment and on the parameters of ventilation.

摘要

为了检验热线风速仪在临床应用中的优势,我们就可靠性和有效性对该工具的两种类型进行了检查。结果发现,电子噪声抑制会导致测量失真。此外,换能器的变化也是偏离真实值的原因。我们要求制造商标明感知阈值以及使用多个换能器进行重复测量的变异系数。我们推荐一条简单的规则,根据设备的阈值和通气参数,可以估算出临床使用中可靠测量的限度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验