Suppr超能文献

基于肠促胰岛素疗法对2型糖尿病患者的心血管影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

The cardiovascular effect of incretin-based therapies among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wu Shanshan, Cipriani Andrea, Yang Zhirong, Yang Jun, Cai Ting, Xu Yang, Quan Xiaochi, Zhang Yuan, Chai Sanbao, Sun Feng, Zhan Siyan

机构信息

a National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases , Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China.

b Department of Psychiatry , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;17(3):243-249. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1424826. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with duration≥12 weeks. Network meta-analysis was performed, followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. The outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated as the measure of effect size.

RESULTS

281 RCTs (76.9% double-blinded) with 180,000 patients were included, comparing incretin-based therapies with other six classes of anti-diabetic drugs or placebo. A statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events was found in favour of GLP-1RAs when compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.80-0.99) and sulfonylurea (OR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59-0.99), whereas DPP-4 inhibitors showed a neutral effect compared with placebo (OR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.83-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Incretin-based therapies show similar cardiovascular risk in comparison with metformin, insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2. GLP-1RA could decrease the risk compared with sulfonylurea or placebo, while DPP-4I appears to have neutral effect on cardiovascular risk.

摘要

目的

评估基于肠促胰岛素的疗法在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的心血管安全性,并进行比较。

方法

检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和www.clinicaltrials.gov上持续时间≥12周的随机对照试验(RCT)。进行网状Meta分析,随后进行亚组分析和Meta回归。采用推荐评估、制定和评价系统(GRADE)评估证据质量。感兴趣的结局是心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风和心力衰竭的综合结果。计算比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)作为效应量指标。

结果

纳入了281项RCT(76.9%为双盲试验),共180,000例患者,比较了基于肠促胰岛素的疗法与其他六类抗糖尿病药物或安慰剂。与安慰剂(OR 0.89,95%CI:0.80 - 0.99)和磺脲类药物(OR 0.76,95%CI:0.59 - 0.99)相比,发现GLP - 1受体激动剂(GLP - 1RA)能显著降低心血管事件风险,而二肽基肽酶 - 4抑制剂(DPP - 4抑制剂)与安慰剂相比显示出中性效应(OR 0.92,95%CI:0.83 - 1.01)。

结论

与二甲双胍、胰岛素、噻唑烷二酮类、α - 葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和钠 - 葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2相比,基于肠促胰岛素的疗法显示出相似的心血管风险。与磺脲类药物或安慰剂相比,GLP - 1RA可降低风险,而DPP - 4抑制剂似乎对心血管风险具有中性作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验