Wu Shanshan, Cipriani Andrea, Yang Zhirong, Yang Jun, Cai Ting, Xu Yang, Quan Xiaochi, Zhang Yuan, Chai Sanbao, Sun Feng, Zhan Siyan
a National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases , Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China.
b Department of Psychiatry , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;17(3):243-249. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1424826. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with duration≥12 weeks. Network meta-analysis was performed, followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. The outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated as the measure of effect size.
281 RCTs (76.9% double-blinded) with 180,000 patients were included, comparing incretin-based therapies with other six classes of anti-diabetic drugs or placebo. A statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events was found in favour of GLP-1RAs when compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.80-0.99) and sulfonylurea (OR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59-0.99), whereas DPP-4 inhibitors showed a neutral effect compared with placebo (OR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.83-1.01).
Incretin-based therapies show similar cardiovascular risk in comparison with metformin, insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2. GLP-1RA could decrease the risk compared with sulfonylurea or placebo, while DPP-4I appears to have neutral effect on cardiovascular risk.
评估基于肠促胰岛素的疗法在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的心血管安全性,并进行比较。
检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和www.clinicaltrials.gov上持续时间≥12周的随机对照试验(RCT)。进行网状Meta分析,随后进行亚组分析和Meta回归。采用推荐评估、制定和评价系统(GRADE)评估证据质量。感兴趣的结局是心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风和心力衰竭的综合结果。计算比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)作为效应量指标。
纳入了281项RCT(76.9%为双盲试验),共180,000例患者,比较了基于肠促胰岛素的疗法与其他六类抗糖尿病药物或安慰剂。与安慰剂(OR 0.89,95%CI:0.80 - 0.99)和磺脲类药物(OR 0.76,95%CI:0.59 - 0.99)相比,发现GLP - 1受体激动剂(GLP - 1RA)能显著降低心血管事件风险,而二肽基肽酶 - 4抑制剂(DPP - 4抑制剂)与安慰剂相比显示出中性效应(OR 0.92,95%CI:0.83 - 1.01)。
与二甲双胍、胰岛素、噻唑烷二酮类、α - 葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和钠 - 葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2相比,基于肠促胰岛素的疗法显示出相似的心血管风险。与磺脲类药物或安慰剂相比,GLP - 1RA可降低风险,而DPP - 4抑制剂似乎对心血管风险具有中性作用。