Suppr超能文献

入侵物种(空心莲子草)中食草动物诱导反应的特异性

Specificity of herbivore-induced responses in an invasive species, (alligator weed).

作者信息

Liu Mu, Zhou Fang, Pan Xiaoyun, Zhang Zhijie, Traw Milton B, Li Bo

机构信息

Institute of Biodiversity Science Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering Fudan University Shanghai China.

Department of Biology Berea College Berea KY USA.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov 23;8(1):59-70. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3615. eCollection 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Herbivory-induced responses in plants can both negatively affect subsequently colonizing herbivores and mitigate the effect of herbivory on the host. However, it is still less known whether plants exhibit specific responses to specialist and generalist herbivores in non-secondary metabolite traits and how specificity to specialists and generalists differs between invasive and native plant populations. We exposed an invasive plant, , to (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae; specialist), (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae; generalist), manual clipping, or application of exogenous jasmonic acid and examined both the specificity of elicitation in traits of fitness (e.g., aboveground biomass), morphology (e.g., root:shoot ratio), and chemistry (e.g., C/N ratio and lignin), and specificity of effect on the subsequent performance of and . Then, we assessed variation of the specificity between invasive and native populations (USA and Argentina, respectively). The results showed induced higher branching intensity and specific leaf area but lower C/N ratio than , whereas induced higher trichome density than . The negative effect of induction on subsequent larval growth was greater for than for . Invasive populations had a weaker response to than to in triterpenoid saponins and C/N ratio, while native populations responded similarly to these two herbivores. The specific effect on the two herbivores feeding on induced plants did not vary between invasive and native populations. Overall, we demonstrate specificity of elicitation to specialist and generalist herbivores in non-secondary metabolite traits, and that the generalist is more susceptible to induction than the specialist. Furthermore, chemical responses specific to specialist and generalist herbivores only exist in the invasive populations, consistent with an evolutionary change in specificity in the invasive populations.

摘要

植物中食草动物诱导的反应既会对随后定殖的食草动物产生负面影响,也会减轻食草作用对宿主的影响。然而,对于植物在非次生代谢物性状方面是否对专食性和广食性食草动物表现出特定反应,以及入侵植物种群和本地植物种群对专食性和广食性食草动物的特异性差异如何,人们仍然知之甚少。我们将一种入侵植物暴露于双斑萤叶甲(鞘翅目,叶甲科;专食性)、甘蓝夜蛾(鳞翅目,夜蛾科;广食性)、人工修剪或外源茉莉酸处理下,研究了其在适合度性状(如地上生物量)、形态学性状(如根冠比)和化学性状(如碳氮比和木质素)方面诱导反应的特异性,以及对双斑萤叶甲和甘蓝夜蛾后续表现影响的特异性。然后,我们评估了入侵种群和本地种群(分别来自美国和阿根廷)之间特异性的差异。结果表明,与甘蓝夜蛾相比,双斑萤叶甲诱导出更高的分枝强度和比叶面积,但碳氮比更低,而甘蓝夜蛾诱导出更高的毛状体密度。诱导对后续幼虫生长的负面影响,双斑萤叶甲比甘蓝夜蛾更大。在三萜皂苷和碳氮比方面,入侵种群对双斑萤叶甲的反应比对甘蓝夜蛾的反应弱,而本地种群对这两种食草动物的反应相似。入侵种群和本地种群对取食诱导植物的两种食草动物的特定影响没有差异。总体而言,我们证明了在非次生代谢物性状方面对专食性和广食性食草动物诱导反应的特异性,并且广食性食草动物比专食性食草动物更容易受到诱导。此外,专食性和广食性食草动物特有的化学响应仅存在于入侵种群中,这与入侵种群特异性的进化变化一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1608/5756832/b5b903093880/ECE3-8-59-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验