• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型无脊椎动物群落对灌溉稻田施用农药的响应。

Responses of macroinvertebrate communities to pesticide application in irrigated rice fields.

作者信息

Stenert Cristina, de Mello Íris C M F, Pires Mateus M, Knauth Débora S, Katayama Naoki, Maltchik Leonardo

机构信息

Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems, UNISINOS, Unisinos Avenue, 950, São Leopoldo, RS, 93.022-750, Brazil.

Biodiversity Division, Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, NARO, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305-8604, Japan.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jan 10;190(2):74. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6425-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-017-6425-1
PMID:29322271
Abstract

The ability to recover to original states after disturbances makes macroinvertebrates useful tools for assessing the impacts of pesticides. Many studies showed that direct exposure to pesticides decreases macroinvertebrate richness and alters their composition. The main objective of this study was to assess recovery patterns in macroinvertebrate communities after pesticide application in irrigated rice fields. We analyzed short-term temporal dynamics of macroinvertebrate communities after application of the herbicides bispyribac-sodium and clomazone and the insecticide chlorantraniliprole, over the rice-growing season in southern Brazil. We selected three conventional rice fields and the recovery of macroinvertebrate communities was also compared with three adjacent natural ponds. The study was developed from November 2011 to February 2012 (rice-growing season). Five macroinvertebrate collections were carried out 3, 7, 14, 38, and 60 days after pesticide application (November 25). Rice fields showed lower richness and abundance than ponds in the period immediately after pesticide application, and recovery rates in the richness of macroinvertebrate communities were more conspicuous as pesticide residuals dissipated from the fields. Macroinvertebrate community structure in rice fields also became more similar to natural ponds as pesticide traces were scarcer. However, macroinvertebrate abundance patterns were not related to pesticide concentrations in the fields. Our results supported the general hypothesis on the negative effects of pesticide application on macroinvertebrate community in irrigated rice fields, although other environmental features (e.g., length of the flooded period) also contributed to explain temporal dynamics in the macroinvertebrate communities from irrigated rice fields.

摘要

在受到干扰后恢复到原始状态的能力,使大型无脊椎动物成为评估农药影响的有用工具。许多研究表明,直接接触农药会降低大型无脊椎动物的丰富度并改变其组成。本研究的主要目的是评估灌溉稻田施用农药后大型无脊椎动物群落的恢复模式。我们分析了在巴西南部水稻生长季节施用除草剂双草醚和异恶草酮以及杀虫剂氯虫苯甲酰胺后大型无脊椎动物群落的短期时间动态。我们选择了三块常规稻田,并将大型无脊椎动物群落的恢复情况与三个相邻的天然池塘进行了比较。该研究于2011年11月至2012年2月(水稻生长季节)开展。在施用农药(11月25日)后的第3、7、14、38和60天进行了五次大型无脊椎动物采集。在施用农药后的 immediately immediately 时期,稻田的丰富度和丰度低于池塘,随着农药残留从田间消散,大型无脊椎动物群落丰富度的恢复率更为明显。随着农药痕迹变少,稻田中的大型无脊椎动物群落结构也变得更类似于天然池塘。然而,大型无脊椎动物的丰度模式与田间农药浓度无关。我们的结果支持了关于施用农药对灌溉稻田大型无脊椎动物群落产生负面影响的一般假设,尽管其他环境特征(例如,淹水期长度)也有助于解释灌溉稻田大型无脊椎动物群落的时间动态。 (注:原文中“immediately after pesticide application”处多了个“immediately”,翻译时按正确理解翻译)

相似文献

1
Responses of macroinvertebrate communities to pesticide application in irrigated rice fields.大型无脊椎动物群落对灌溉稻田施用农药的响应。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jan 10;190(2):74. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6425-1.
2
Richness and density of aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates after exposure to fungicides and insecticides in rice paddy fields.稻田中水生底栖大型无脊椎动物在接触杀菌剂和杀虫剂后的丰富度和密度。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017 Jan-Mar;89(1):355-369. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720160574. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Influence of fipronil compounds and rice-cultivation land-use intensity on macroinvertebrate communities in streams of southwestern Louisiana, USA.氟虫腈化合物及水稻种植土地利用强度对美国路易斯安那州西南部溪流大型无脊椎动物群落的影响
Environ Pollut. 2008 Mar;152(2):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.021. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
4
Response of macroinvertebrate communities to temporal dynamics of pesticide mixtures: A case study from the Sacramento River watershed, California.大型无脊椎动物群落对农药混合物时间动态的响应:来自加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托河流域的案例研究。
Environ Pollut. 2016 Dec;219:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.048. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
Dissipation and residues of bispyribac-sodium in rice and environment.双丙环虫酯在水稻和环境中的消解与残留。
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Dec;185(12):9743-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3287-z. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
6
Ecological risk analysis of pesticides used on irrigated rice crops in southern Brazil.巴西南部灌溉稻田使用的农药的生态风险分析。
Chemosphere. 2016 Nov;162:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.046. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
7
Seasonal changes of macroinvertebrate communities in a stormwater wetland collecting pesticide runoff from a vineyard catchment (Alsace, France).从一个葡萄园集水区(法国阿尔萨斯)收集农药径流的雨水湿地中大型无脊椎动物群落的季节性变化。
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012 Jan;62(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s00244-011-9687-6. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
Using a Bayesian Network Model to Predict Risk of Pesticides on Aquatic Community Endpoints in a Rice Field-A Southern European Case Study.利用贝叶斯网络模型预测稻田中水生社区终点的农药风险——一个南欧案例研究。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024 Jan;43(1):182-196. doi: 10.1002/etc.5755. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
9
Ecological risks of insecticide contamination in water and sediment around off-farm irrigated rice paddy fields.农田灌溉沟渠周边水和沉积物中杀虫剂污染的生态风险。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Aug;251:628-638. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
Bioaccumulation and Elimination of the Herbicide Clomazone in the Earthworms Eisenia fetida.除草剂异恶草酮在赤子爱胜蚓中的生物累积与消除
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015 Nov;95(5):606-10. doi: 10.1007/s00128-015-1649-7. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyanobacteria-Pesticide Interactions and Their Implications for Sustainable Rice Agroecosystems.蓝藻与农药的相互作用及其对水稻可持续农业生态系统的影响
Int J Microbiol. 2025 Apr 1;2025:7265036. doi: 10.1155/ijm/7265036. eCollection 2025.
2
Combined impact of pesticides and other environmental stressors on animal diversity in irrigation ponds.灌溉池塘中农药和其他环境胁迫因素对动物多样性的综合影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0229052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229052. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Richness and density of aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates after exposure to fungicides and insecticides in rice paddy fields.稻田中水生底栖大型无脊椎动物在接触杀菌剂和杀虫剂后的丰富度和密度。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017 Jan-Mar;89(1):355-369. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720160574. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
2
Pesticides in Brazilian freshwaters: a critical review.巴西淡水中的农药:一项批判性综述。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2016 Jul 13;18(7):779-87. doi: 10.1039/c6em00268d.
3
Pesticide use in Brazil and problems for public health.巴西的农药使用情况及对公众健康的影响
Cad Saude Publica. 2014 Jul;30(7):1360-2. doi: 10.1590/0102-311xpe020714.
4
Can rice field channels contribute to biodiversity conservation in Southern Brazilian wetlands?巴西南部湿地的稻田水渠有助于生物多样性保护吗?
Rev Biol Trop. 2011 Dec;59(4):1895-914.
5
Macroinvertebrate responses to insecticide application between sprayed and adjacent nonsprayed ditch sections of different sizes.大型无脊椎动物对不同大小施药沟渠段和相邻非施药沟渠段之间施用药剂的反应。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 Sep;29(9):1994-2008. doi: 10.1002/etc.238.
6
Ecotoxicological effects of rice field waters on selected planktonic species: comparison between conventional and organic farming.稻田水对选定浮游生物物种的生态毒理学影响:常规和有机农业的比较。
Ecotoxicology. 2010 Nov;19(8):1523-35. doi: 10.1007/s10646-010-0537-5. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
7
Impact of a benzoyl urea insecticide on aquatic macroinvertebrates in ditch mesocosms with and without non-sprayed sections.含苯甲酰脲类杀虫剂的沟渠微宇宙中,有和无未喷施区对大型水生无脊椎动物的影响。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Oct;28(10):2191-205. doi: 10.1897/09-010.1.
8
Uselessness and indirect negative effects of an insecticide on rice field invertebrates.一种杀虫剂对稻田无脊椎动物的无用性及间接负面影响。
C R Biol. 2005 Oct-Nov;328(10-11):955-62. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
9
Ecology of insect communities in nontidal wetlands.非潮汐湿地昆虫群落生态学
Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41:75-100. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000451.