Pharmacy Services, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 May;37(5):799-822. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3166-6. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
The purpose of this paper was to review the literature regarding the clinical and economic impact of pharmacist interventions (PIs) related to antimicrobials in the hospital setting. A PubMed literature search from January 2003 to March 2016 was conducted using the terms pharmacist* or clinical pharmacist* combined with antimicrobial* or antibiotic* or anti-infective*. Comparative studies that assessed the clinical and/or economic impact of PIs on antimicrobials in the hospital setting were reviewed. Outcomes were classified as: treatment-related outcomes (TROs), clinical outcomes (COs), cost and microbiological outcomes (MOs). Acceptance of pharmacist recommendations by physicians was collected. PIs were grouped into patient-specific recommendations (PSRs), policy, and education. Studies' risk of bias was analyzed using Cochrane's tool. Twenty-three studies were evaluated. All of them had high risk of bias. The design in most cases was uncontrolled before and after. PSRs were included in every study; five also included policy and four education. Significant impact of PI was found in 14 of the 18 studies (77.8%) that evaluated costs, 15 of the 20 studies (75.0%) that assessed TROs, 12 of the 22 studies (54.5%) that analyzed COs, and one of the two studies (50.0%) that evaluated MOs. None of the studies found significant negative impact of PIs. It could not be concluded that adding other strategies to PSRs would improve results. Acceptance of recommendations varied from 70 to 97.5%. Pharmacists improve TROs and COs, and decrease costs. Additional research with a lower risk of bias is unlikely to change this conclusion. Future research should focus on identifying the most efficient interventions.
本文旨在回顾有关药师干预(PIs)在医院环境中对抗菌药物的临床和经济影响的文献。使用“pharmacist*”或“clinical pharmacist*”与“antimicrobial*”或“antibiotic*”或“anti-infective*”相结合,对 2003 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月期间的 PubMed 文献进行了检索。评估了 PIs 对抗菌药物在医院环境中的临床和/或经济影响的比较研究被纳入了本综述。结果被分为治疗相关结局(TROs)、临床结局(COs)、成本和微生物学结局(MOs)。收集了医生对药师建议的接受程度。PIs 被分为患者特定建议(PSRs)、政策和教育。使用 Cochrane 工具分析了研究的偏倚风险。共评估了 23 项研究,它们都存在较高的偏倚风险。大多数情况下,研究设计都是在没有对照的情况下进行的。每项研究都包含 PSRs;有 5 项研究还包括政策,4 项研究包括教育。在 18 项评估成本的研究中有 14 项(77.8%)、20 项评估 TRO 的研究中有 15 项(75.0%)、22 项分析 CO 的研究中有 12 项(54.5%)、两项评估 MO 的研究中有一项(50.0%)发现了 PI 的显著影响。没有一项研究发现 PIs 有显著的负面影响。不能得出结论认为将其他策略添加到 PSRs 会改善结果。建议的接受程度从 70%到 97.5%不等。药师改善 TROs 和 COs,并降低成本。进一步的低偏倚风险研究不太可能改变这一结论。未来的研究应侧重于确定最有效的干预措施。