Suppr超能文献

成人常规麻醉师插入喉塞的利弊系统评价:插入和计数喉塞的实践建议:困难气道学会(DAS)、英国口腔颌面外科协会(BAOMS)和英国耳鼻喉科、头颈部外科协会(ENT-UK)的循证共识声明。

Systematic review of benefits or harms of routine anaesthetist-inserted throat packs in adults: practice recommendations for inserting and counting throat packs: An evidence-based consensus statement by the Difficult Airway Society (DAS), the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BAOMS) and the British Association of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (ENT-UK).

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):612-618. doi: 10.1111/anae.14197. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Abstract

Throat packs are commonly inserted by anaesthetists after induction of anaesthesia for dental, maxillofacial, nasal or upper airway surgery. However, the evidence supporting this practice as routine is unclear, especially in the light of accidentally retained throat packs which constitute 'Never Events' as defined by NHS England. On behalf of three relevant national organisations, we therefore conducted a systematic review and literature search to assess the evidence base for benefit, and also the extent and severity of complications associated with throat pack use. Other than descriptions of how to insert throat packs in many standard texts, we could find no study that sought to assess the benefit of their insertion by anaesthetists. Instead, there were many reports of minor and major complications (the latter including serious postoperative airway obstruction and at least one death), and many descriptions of how to avoid complications. As a result of these findings, the three national organisations no longer recommend the routine insertion of throat packs by anaesthetists but advise caution and careful consideration. Two protocols for pack insertion are presented, should their use be judged necessary.

摘要

喉包通常由麻醉师在进行牙科、颌面、鼻或上呼吸道手术的麻醉诱导后插入。然而,支持这种常规做法的证据并不明确,尤其是考虑到意外遗留的喉包,这些喉包构成了英格兰国民保健制度定义的“Never Events”。因此,代表三个相关的国家组织,我们进行了系统评价和文献检索,以评估使用喉包的益处,以及与喉包使用相关的并发症的程度和严重程度。除了在许多标准文本中描述如何插入喉包之外,我们没有找到任何旨在评估麻醉师插入喉包益处的研究。相反,有许多关于轻微和严重并发症的报告(后者包括严重的术后气道阻塞和至少一例死亡),以及许多关于如何避免并发症的描述。由于这些发现,三个国家组织不再建议麻醉师常规插入喉包,但建议谨慎和仔细考虑。如果认为有必要使用喉包,我们提出了两种插入方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验