• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗与食管癌手术中的淋巴结清扫和切缘关系。

Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer.

机构信息

Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.

Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, 90014, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18879-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-18879-6
PMID:29323261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5765051/
Abstract

Differences in lymph node yield and tumour-involved resection margins comparing neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery with surgery alone for oesophageal cancer are unclear. Patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden in 1987-2010 were included. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy were compared with those who underwent surgery alone. Outcomes were the number of examined lymph nodes (main outcome), number metastatic lymph nodes, and resection margin status. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs of lymph node yield were calculated by Poisson regression, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of resection margin status by multivariable logistic regression, both adjusted for confounders. Among 1818 patients, 587 (32%) had received neoadjuvant therapy and 1231 (68%) had not. Lymph node yield was lower in the neoadjuvant therapy group (median 6 versus 8; adjusted RR 0.75, 0.73-0.78). Fewer metastatic nodes were identified following neoadjuvant therapy (median 0 versus 1; adjusted RR 0.76, 0.69-0.84). Neoadjuvant therapy associated to decreased risk of tumour-involved resection margins when adjusted for confounders except T-stage (OR 0.52, 0.38-0.70), but the association did not remain after adjustment for T-stage (OR 0.91, 0.64-1.29). Neoadjuvant therapy seems to decrease the lymph node yield and decrease the risk of tumour-involved resection margins by shrinking primary tumour.

摘要

新辅助治疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管癌的淋巴结检出量和肿瘤累及切缘的差异尚不清楚。纳入了 1987-2010 年在瑞典接受食管癌手术的患者。比较了接受新辅助治疗的患者和单纯手术的患者。结局为检查的淋巴结数量(主要结局)、转移淋巴结数量和切缘状态。采用泊松回归计算淋巴结检出量的率比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),采用多变量逻辑回归计算切缘状态的比值比(OR)及其 95%CI,均调整了混杂因素。在 1818 例患者中,587 例(32%)接受了新辅助治疗,1231 例(68%)未接受。新辅助治疗组的淋巴结检出量较低(中位数 6 对 8;调整 RR 0.75,0.73-0.78)。新辅助治疗后,检出的转移淋巴结数量较少(中位数 0 对 1;调整 RR 0.76,0.69-0.84)。在调整了混杂因素(除 T 分期外)后,新辅助治疗与肿瘤累及切缘的风险降低相关(OR 0.52,0.38-0.70),但在调整 T 分期后,相关性不再存在(OR 0.91,0.64-1.29)。新辅助治疗似乎通过缩小原发肿瘤来降低淋巴结检出量和肿瘤累及切缘的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c121/5765051/f74c1406f782/41598_2017_18879_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c121/5765051/f74c1406f782/41598_2017_18879_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c121/5765051/f74c1406f782/41598_2017_18879_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer.新辅助治疗与食管癌手术中的淋巴结清扫和切缘关系。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18879-6.
2
Prognostic implications of the lymph node count after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.新辅助治疗后直肠淋巴结计数的预后意义。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):133-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9341.
3
Lymphadenectomy and risk of reoperation or mortality shortly after surgery for oesophageal cancer.食管癌手术后短期内淋巴结清扫术与再手术或死亡率的关系。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 31;6:36092. doi: 10.1038/srep36092.
4
Impact of Extent of Lymphadenectomy on Survival, Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transthoracic Esophagectomy.淋巴结清扫范围对新辅助化疗后经胸段食管癌切除术患者生存率的影响
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):750-756. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001737.
5
Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管癌患者环周切缘的预后价值及其定义
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Feb 1;31(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox117.
6
Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Specimens: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Fixatives.新辅助放化疗后直肠癌标本淋巴结检出量:两种固定剂的随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Aug;61(8):888-896. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001097.
7
The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent.无论新辅助放化疗或淋巴结清扫范围如何,转移性淋巴结数量以及转移淋巴结与检查淋巴结的比例都是食管癌独立的预后因素。
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):365-71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf.
8
Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接受新辅助放疗的直肠癌患者直肠切除术后的淋巴结获取情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
9
Worldwide Oesophageal Cancer Collaboration guidelines for lymphadenectomy predict survival following neoadjuvant therapy.全球食管癌协作组淋巴结清扫指南预测新辅助治疗后生存。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Oct;42(4):659-64. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs105. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
Outcome of neoadjuvant therapies for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction based on a national data registry.基于国家数据登记处的食管或胃食管交界处癌症新辅助治疗的结果。
Br J Surg. 2016 Dec;103(13):1864-1873. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10304. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of textbook outcome following oesophagogastric cancer surgery.胃食管癌症手术后的教科书结局预测因素。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Jul 3;37(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae023.
2
Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.胃癌淋巴结清扫的现状。
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1751-1758. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01576-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Impacts of neoadjuvant therapy on the number of dissected lymph nodes in esophagogastric junction cancer patients.新辅助治疗对食管胃结合部癌患者淋巴结清扫数量的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study in the Netherlands.新辅助放化疗联合食管癌切除术治疗癌症患者的淋巴结清扫数目对总生存率的影响:荷兰基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):863-869. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002389.
2
Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy.淋巴结清扫范围与接受或未接受诱导治疗的食管癌切除术后总生存期的改善相关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb;103(2):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 9;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02705-7.
4
Feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma - Experience from a tertiary care centre.新辅助放化疗后微创食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的可行性、安全性及肿瘤学结局——来自三级医疗中心的经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;18(4):545-556. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_242_21.
5
The Value of Lymphadenectomy Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy in Carcinoma Esophagus: a Review.新辅助治疗后食管癌淋巴结清扫术的价值:综述
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(3):538-548. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01156-w. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Adequate Lymphadenectomy as a Quality Measure in Esophageal Cancer: Is there an Association with Treatment Approach?食管癌淋巴结清扫充分作为质量指标:与治疗方法有关吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4443-4456. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08578-4. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis.奥地利远端食管腺癌患者的围手术期化疗与新辅助放化疗的比较:一项回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug 19;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6.
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:一项基于人群的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.078. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Impact of the number of resected lymph nodes on survival after preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.食管癌术前放疗后切除淋巴结数量对生存的影响。
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 19;7(16):22497-507. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8113.
5
Surgical Proficiency Gain and Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer.癌症患者食管癌切除术后手术熟练度提升与生存
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1528-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2875. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
The prognostic value of metastatic lymph node number and ratio in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation.有或无新辅助放化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者中转移淋巴结数量和比例的预后价值
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug;50(2):337-43. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw016. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.一项关于新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗食管癌或胃食管交界癌的随机临床试验。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):660-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw010. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
8
Extent of Lymphadenectomy and Prognosis After Esophageal Cancer Surgery.食管癌手术后淋巴结清扫范围与预后
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):32-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2611.
9
Significance of Microscopically Incomplete Resection Margin After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌食管切除术后显微镜下切缘不完全的意义
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):712-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001325.
10
Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.可切除胸段食管癌的术前化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 19;2015(5):CD001556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001556.pub3.